A comparative study of umbilical port versus epigastric port for gall bladder extraction in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Authors

  • Jenishkumar Vijaykumar Modi Department of General Surgery, Surat Municipal Institute of Medical Education and Research, Surat, Gujarat, India
  • Parag Hiralal Godhani Department of General Surgery, Surat Municipal Institute of Medical Education and Research, Surat, Gujarat, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20232493

Keywords:

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Umbilical port, Epigastric port, Postoperative pain, Port site hernia, Wound infection

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold standard treatment for symptomatic cholelithiasis. Postoperative pain is important factor that decide requirement of injectable analgesics and post-operative hospital stay. Gall bladder (GB) can be extracted from umbilical or epigastric port. Excessive manipulation during GB extraction can cause postoperative pain.

Methods: Study was carried out in 60 patients between January 2022 to December 2022, including patients who have symptomatic gall bladder stone and required laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients with perforated GB and required emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy and patient having GB carcinoma and required elective laparoscopic radical cholecystectomy and patients requiring laparoscopy converted to open cholecystectomy were not included in the study. In this study, patients were randomly allocated in two groups: group A (n=30) includes laparoscopic cholecystectomy with GB retrieval from epigastric port and group B (n=30) includes laparoscopic cholecystectomy with GB retrieval from umbilical port. Author have compared two groups in terms of intraoperative time, postoperative pain, wound infection and port site hernia development.

Results: This study shows that there is no significant difference in intraoperative time, wound infection and port site hernia development between two groups but there is significant less postoperative pain in group B patients with GB retrieval from umbilical port.

Conclusions: In laparoscopic cholecystectomy, there is no significant difference in GB retrieval from umbilical port and epigastric port in terms of intraoperative time, wound infection and port site hernia development. But GB retrieval from umbilical port reduce post-operative pain in comparison to epigastric port GB retrieval.

 

References

Turan A, Erdinc K, Nihan A, Kemal A, Halis B, Mehmet H, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystistis: Comparison of results between early and late cholecystectomy. Pan Afr Med J. 2017;26:49.

Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H. Characteristics and prediction of early pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Pain. 2001;90:261-9.

Liu YY, Yeh CN, Lee HL, wang SY, Tsai CY, Lin CC, et al. Local anesthesia with ropivacaine for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:2376-80.

Hunter JG, Thompson SK. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, intraoperative cholangiography and common bile duct exploration. In: Fischer JE, Bland KI, editors. Mastery of surgery. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 2007;1117-28.

Litwin DE, Cahan MA. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Clin North Am. 2008;88:1295-313.

Thompson JN, Appleton 5G. Laparoscopic biliary surgery. In: Kirk RM, editor. General Surgical Operations. London: Churchill Livingstone. 2006;304-16.

Abbas T, Saleha AK, Lateef M, Burhan-ul-Haq FR, Chaudhry ZA. Procedural time and complications in delivery of gall bladder in laparoscopic cholecystectomy umbilical port vs subxiphoid port. J Allama Iqbal Med Col. 2012;9:54-7.

Siddiqui NA, Azami R, Murtaza G, Nasim S. Postoperative port site pain after gall bladder retrieval from epigastric vs umbilical port in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Surg. 2012;10:213-6.

Comitalo JB. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and newer techniques of gallbladder removal. JSLS. 2012;16(3):406-12.

Golash V, Rahman S. Railroading removal of gall bladder in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Minim Access Surg. 2006;2(1):31-2.

Haribhakti SP, Mistry JH. Techniques of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Nomenclature and selection. J Minim Access Surg. 2015;11(2):113-8.

Lee IO, Kim SH, Kong MH, Lee MK, Kim NS, Choi YS, Lim SH. Pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the effect and timing of incisional and intraperitoneal bupivacaine. Can J Anaesth. 2001;48(6):545-50.

Brockmann JG, Kocher T, Senninger NJ, Schürmann GM. Complications due to gallstones lost during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2002;16(8):1226-32.

Hunter JG, Thompson SK. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, intraoperative cholangiography, and common bile duct exploration. Fischer JE, Bland KI, editors. Mastery of surgery, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 2007;1117-28.

Litwin DEM, Cahan MA. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Clin North Am. 2008;88(6):1295-313.

Thompson JN, Appleton SG. Laparoscopic biliary surgery. Kirk RM, editors. General surgical operations. Churchill Livingstone. 2006;304-16.

Siddiqui NA, Azami R, Murtaza G, Nasim S. Postoperative port site pain after gall bladder retrieval from epigastric vs umbilical port in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Surg. 2012;10:213-6.

Gurusamy KS, Samraj K. Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Cochrane Dtabase Syst Rev. 2006;CD005440.

Squirrell DM, Majeed AW, Troy G, Peacock JE, Nicholl JP, Johnson AG: A randomized, prospective, blinded comparison of postoperative pain, metabolic response, and perceived health after laparoscopic and small incision cholecystectomy. Surgery. 1998;123:485-95.

Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H. Characteristics and prediction of early pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Pain. 2001;90:261-9.

Hajong R, Dhal MR, Natung T, Khongwar D, Jyoti AB, Newmw K. A comparative study of postoperative port site pain after gall bladder retrieval from umbilical versus epigastric ports in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Family Med Prim Care. 2019;8:1617-20.

Shakya JP, Agrawal N, Kumar A, Singh A, Gogia B, Yadav C. A comparative study of incidence of pain and infection in gall bladder extraction via umbilical and epigastric port. Int Surg J. 2017;4:747-50.

Molloy D, Kaloo PD, Cooper M, Nguyen TV. Laparoscopic entry- aliterature review and analysis of techniques and complications of primary port entry. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;42(3)246-54.

Hamzaoglu I, Baca B, Boler DE, Polat E, Ozer Y. is umbilical flora responsible for wound infection after laparoscopic surgery? Surg Laparos Endos Percut Tech. 2004;14(5)263-7.

Helme S, Samdani T, Sinha P. Complications of spilled gallstones following laparoscopic cholecystectomy- a case report and literature overview. J Med Case Rep. 2009;3(1)8626.

Bashir A, Qureshi AU, Afzal S. Comparison of gall bladder retrieval through umbilical port versus subxiphoid port in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Pak J Med Health Sci. 2015;9;731-3.

Carter JE. A new technique of fascial closure for laparoscopic incisions. J Laparoendos Surg. 1994;4(2)143-8.

Kulkarni AA, Sharma G, Deo KB, Jain T. Umbilical port versus epigastric port for gall bladder extraction in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis. Surgeon. 2022;20(3):e26-35.

Downloads

Published

2023-08-10

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles