A randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of mastectomy flap quilting sutures in reducing post modified radical mastectomy seroma formation

Authors

  • Madhu B. S. Department of General Surgery, Mysore Medical College and Research Institute, Mysuru, Karnataka, India
  • Naveen Kumar Reddy M. Department of General Surgery, Mysore Medical College and Research Institute, Mysuru, Karnataka, India
  • Shashi kumar H. B. Department of General Surgery, Mysore Medical College and Research Institute, Mysuru, Karnataka, India
  • Sangeetha Kalabairav Department of General Surgery, Mysore Medical College and Research Institute, Mysuru, Karnataka, India
  • Abilash V. Reddy Department of General Surgery, Mysore Medical College and Research Institute, Mysuru, Karnataka, India
  • Subramanya S. Mallikarjunappa M.B.B.S, Mandya Institute of Medical Sciences, Mandya, Karnataka, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20170219

Keywords:

Flap, Mastectomy, Quilting, Seroma

Abstract

Background: One of the most common complication post modified radical mastectomy is the formation of seroma. Seroma formation in-turn delays wound healing, increases susceptibility to infection, skin flap necrosis, persistent pain and thus prolongs convalescence. For this, several techniques have been tried and trialed to improve primary healing and decrease the formation of seroma.

Methods: Between Aug 2014 and July 2016, 60 patients with carcinoma of the breast, posted for modified radical mastectomy at KR Hospital, Mysuru, Karnataka, India were randomly divided into 2 groups, the study group (30) and the control group (30). In the study group; the mastectomy flap quilting sutures were put between the flap and the pectoral fascia and muscle at different parts of the flap and at the flap edge with absorbable sutures (polyglactin 3-0). In the control group; the flaps were approximated by the conventional method at the edges. Closed suction drains were placed in both the groups. Patients, tumour characteristics and operative related factors were documented. The volume and colour of the fluid drained was recorded everyday. The drains were removed when the amount became less than 30 cc in a 24 hour period. The total volume and duration (number of days) of fluid drained and the complications were recorded and compared.

Results: In the study group, the drain was removed much earlier when compared to the control group (p < 0.001). The total amount of fluid drained was much lower in the study group (p < 0.001). The study group showed a much lower frequency of seroma formation when compared to the control group.

Conclusions: The mastectomy quilting suture technique is an effective procedure that considerably reduces the incidence of seroma formation in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy.

References

Woodworth PA, Mcboyle MF, Helmer SD, Beamer RL. Seroma formation after breast cancer surgery: incidence and predicting factors. Am Surg. 2000;66:444-50.

Roses DF, Brooks AD, Harris MN, Shapiro RL, Mitnick J. Complications of level I and II axillary dissection in the treatment of carcinoma of the breast. Ann Surg. 1999;230:194-201.

Abe M, Iwase T, Takeuchi T, Murai H, Miura S. A randomized controlled trial on the prevention of seroma after partial or total mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection. Breast Cancer. 1998;5:67-9.

Say CC, Donegan W. A biostatistical evaluation of complications from mastectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1974;138:370-6.

EWilliam S. Post-mastectomy serous drainage and seroma: probable pathogenesis and prevention. ANZ J Surg. 2003;73:877-80.

Cancer. Available at http: //ctep.cancer.gov /reporting /ctc.html. Accessed on 12 July 2016.

Pogson CJ, Adwani A, Ebbs SR. Seroma following breast cancer surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2003;29:711-7.

Classe JM, Dupre PF, François T, Robard S, Theard JL, Dravet F. Axillary padding as an alternative to closed suction drain for ambulatory axillary lymphadenectomy: a prospective cohort of 207 patients with early breast cancer. Arch Surg. 2002;137:169-73.

Somers RG, Jablon LK, Kaplan MJ, Sandler GL, Rosenblatt NK. The use of closed suction drainage after lumpectomy and axillary node dissection for breast cancer: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 1992;215:146-9.

Boolsen S, Nielsen VB, Jensen J, Bak S. Post mastectomy seroma. a study of the nature and origin of seroma after mastectomy. Dan Med Bull. 1989;36:487-9.

Petrek J, Peters M, Nori S, Knauer C, Kinne D, Rogatko A. Axillary lymphadenectomy. A prospective, randomized trial of 13 factors influencing drainage, including early or delayed arm mobilization. Arch Surg. 1990;125:378-82.

Halsted WS. Developments in the skin grafting operations for cancer of the breast. JAMA. 1913;60:416-51.

Larsen BB, Hugan C. Fixation of skin flaps in radical mastectomy by subcutaneous sutures; observations. AMA Arch Surg. 1955;71:419-23.

Aitken DR, Hunsaker R, James AG. Prevention of seromas following mastectomy and axillary dissection. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1984;158:327-30.

Hea BJ, Ho MN, Petrek JA. External compression dressing versus standard dressing after axillary lymphadenectomy. Am J Surg. 1999;177:450-3.

Chen CY, Hoe AL, Wong CY. The effect of a pressure garment on post-surgical drainage and seroma formation in breast cancer patients. Singapore Med J. 1998;39:412-5.

Purushotham AD, Mclatchie E, Young D, George WD, Stallard S, Doughty J, et al. Randomized clinical trial of no wound drains and early discharge in the treatment of women with breast cancer. Br J Surg. 2002;89:286-92.

Gonzalez EA, Saltzstein EC, Riedner CS, Nelson BK. Seroma formation following breast cancer surgery. Breast J. 2003;9:385-8.

Hashemi E, Kaviani A, Najafi M, Ebrahimi M, Hooshmand H, Montazeri A. Seroma formation after surgery for breast cancer. World J Surg Oncol. 2004;2:44.

Coveney EC, Dwyer PJ, Geraghty JG, Higgins NJ. Effect of closing dead space on seroma formation after mastectomy a prospective randomized clinical trial. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1993;19:143-6.

Larsen BB, Hugan C. Fixation of skin flaps in radical mastectomy by subcutaneous sutures; observations. AMA Arch Surg. 1955;71:419-23.

Downloads

Published

2017-01-25

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles