Our experience in gastrointestinal perforations: a retrospective study

Authors

  • Thammegowda Kemparaj Department of General Surgery, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bangalore, India
  • Narasimhamurthy Kadirehalli Narasimhaiah Department of General Surgery, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bangalore, India
  • Ravikiran Keragodu Mayigaiah Department of General Surgery, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bangalore, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20170198

Keywords:

Anastomotic leak, Closure technique, Perforations, Peritonitis

Abstract

Background: Peritonitis secondary to gastrointestinal perforation is still one of the commonest surgical emergencies in India and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. The present study examines the incidence of various types of gastrointestinal perforations, their complications and the management of patients with postoperative leaks in our surgical unit and compares our findings with those of previous studies performed between 1984 and 2014.

Methods: Retrospective study analyzing the case files of all the operated cases of gastrointestinal perforations in a single unit over the last 10 years from September 2005 to August 2015 by open procedure. A total number of 381 cases were studied. All cases with perforative peritonitis, whether spontaneous, infective, traumatic or of neoplastic pathology, were included in the study.

Results: Gastrointestinal perforations were common between the ages of 30-50 years; 82% were males. From July to October (rainy seasons) every year a higher number of perforations were noticed; 40% of patients had duodenal, 34% had ileal, 11% appendicular, 6% gastric, 6% jejunal and 3% had colonic perforations. Abdominal pain (100%) and vomiting (81%) were the most common symptoms while tachycardia (50%) and tachypnea (42%) were common signs; 15-20% presented late with features of shock.

Conclusions: Gastrointestinal perforations are one of the most common surgical emergencies. Duodenal perforations are most common. Ileal perforations secondary to enteric fever (typhoid) have highest morbidity and mortality. Most of the anastomotic leaks can be treated conservatively. Mortality depends on the general condition of the patient and associated pre-operative comorbidities.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Tripathi MD, Nagar AM, Srivastava RD, Partap VK. Peritonitis study of factors contributing to mortality. Indian J Surg. 2010;55:342-9.

Washington BC, Villalba MR, Lauter CB. Cefamendole erythromycin-heparin peritoneal irrigation. An adjunct to the surgical treatment of diffuse bacterial peritonitis. Surgery. 2008;94:576-81.

Nomikos IN, Katsouyanni K, Papaioannou AN. Washing with or without chloremphenicol in the treatment of peritonitis a prospective clinical trial. Surgery. 2006;99:20-5.

Shinagawa N, Muramoto M, Sakurai S, Fukui T, Hon K, Taniguchi M, et al. A bacteriological study of perforated duodenal ulcer. Jap J Surg. 2005;21:17-25.

Khanna AK, Mishra MK: Typhoid perforation of the gut. Postgraduate Medical Journal. 2003;60:523.

Noon GP, Beall AC, Jorden GL. Clinical evaluation of peritoneal irrigation with antibiotic solution. Surgery. 2001;67:73.

Bali R, Verma S, Agarwal P, Singh R, Talwar N. Perforation peritonitis and the developing world. ISRN Surgery. 2014;2014:1-4.

Jhobta R, Attri A, Kaushik R, Sharma R, Jhobta A. Spectrum of perforation peritonitis in India-review of 504 consecutive cases. World J Emergency Surg. 2006;1(1):26.

Quereshi AM, Zafar A, Saeed K, Quddus A. Predictive power of mannheim peritonitis index. JCPSP. 2005;15:693-6.

Nishida T, Fujita N, Megawa T, Nakahara M, Nakao K. Postoperative hyperbilirubinemia after surgery for gastrointestinal perforation. Surgery. 2002;32:679-84.

Chen SC, Lin FY, Hsieh YS, Chen WJ. Accuracy of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of peritonitis compared with the clinical impression of the surgeon. Arch Surg. 2000;135:170-4.

Dorairajan LN, Gupta S, Suryanarayana SV, Chumber S, Sharma LK. Peritonitis in India - A decade's experience. Trop Gastroenterol. 1995;16:33-8.

Dandapat MC, Mukherjee LM, Mishra SB, Howlader PC. Gastrointestinal perforations. Indian J Surg. 1991;53:189-93.

Sharma L, Gupta S, Soin AS, Sikora S, Kapoor V. Generalized peritonitis in India-the tropical spectrum. Jpn J Surg. 1991;21:272-7.

Shah HK, Trivedi VD. Peritonitis - a study of 110 cases. Indian Practitioner. 1988;41:855-60.

Kachroo R, Ahmed MN, Zargar HU. Peritonitis - an analysis of 90 cases. Indian J Surg. 1984;46:204-9.

Downloads

Published

2017-01-25

How to Cite

Kemparaj, T., Narasimhaiah, N. K., & Mayigaiah, R. K. (2017). Our experience in gastrointestinal perforations: a retrospective study. International Surgery Journal, 4(2), 593–597. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20170198

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles