Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: new paradigm towards excellence

Authors

  • Birbal Kumar Department of Minimal Invasive Surgery, HPB and General Surgery, Marengo QRG, Haryana, India
  • Dipankar S. Mitra Department of Minimal Invasive Surgery, HPB and General Surgery, Marengo QRG, Haryana, India
  • Balkishan Gupta Department of Minimal Invasive Surgery, HPB and General Surgery, Marengo QRG, Haryana, India
  • Chandramohan Department of Minimal Invasive Surgery, HPB and General Surgery, Marengo QRG, Haryana, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20231396

Keywords:

Laparoscopic, Colorectal, Colectomy, Randomized controlled trials, Pelvic dissection

Abstract

There is evidence accumulated that the laparoscopic approach is equivalent or superior to an open operation for a broad spectrum of colorectal procedures. Laparoscopic colectomy has been accepted late due to its technical complexity and favorable outcome. This is because of its steep learning curve, concerns with oncological outcomes, lack of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and initial reports on port-site recurrence after curative resection. As the field continues to evolve surgeons are gaining increasing experience with more complex procedures, including total abdominal colectomies and low pelvic dissection. These advances expand the spectrum of indications that are appropriate for laparoscopic approach and the number of patients who potentially benefit from the technique.

References

Simorov A, Shaligram A, Shostrom V, Boilesen E, Thompson J, Oleynikov D, et al. Laparoscopic colon resection trends in utilization and rate of conversion to open procedure: a national database review of academic medical centers. Ann Surg. 2012;256(3):462-8.

Fox J, Gross CP, Longo W, Reddy V. Laparoscopic colectomy for the treatment of cancer has been widely adopted in the United States. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55(5):501-8.

Heald RJ. The Holy Plane of rectal surgery. J R Soc Med. 1988;81(9):503-8.

Hartley JE, Mehigan BJ, Qureshi AE, Duthie GS, Lee PW, Monson JR, et al. Total mesorectal excision: assessment of the laparoscopic approach. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44(3):315-21.

Darzi A, Lewis C, Menzies-Gow N, Guillou PJ, Monson JR. Laparoscopic abdominoperineal excision of the rectum. Surg Endosc. 1995;9(4):414-7.

Fleshman J, Branda ME, Sargent DJ, Boller AN, George VV, Abbas MA, et al. Disease-free survival and local recurrence for laparoscopic resection compared with open resection of stage II to III rectal cancer: follow-up results of the ACOSOG Z6051 randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2019;269(4):589-95.

Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY, Nam BH, Choi HS, Kim D, et al. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(7):637-45.

Weeks JC, Nelson H, Gelber S, Sargent D, Schroeder G, Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy (COST) Study Group. Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomized trial. Jama. 2002;287(2):321-8.

Bonjer HJ, Hop WC, Nelson H, Sargent DJ, Lacy AM, Castells A, et al. Laparoscopically assisted vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a meta-analysis. Arch Surg. 2007;142(3):298-303.

Jackson TD, Kaplan GG, Arena G, Page JH, Rogers SO. Laparoscopic versus open resection for colorectal cancer: a metaanalysis of oncologic outcomes. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204(3):439-46.

Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, Fürst A, Lacy AM, Hop WC, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(3):210-8.

Stevenson AR, Solomon MJ, Lumley JW, Hewett P, Clouston AD, Gebski VJ, et al. Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection on pathological outcomes in rectal cancer: the ALaCaRT randomized clinical trial. Jama. 2015;314(13):1356-63.

Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AMH, et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;365(9472):1718-26.

Jager RM, Wexner S. Minimally invasive surgery for diseases of the colon and rectum: the legacy of an ancient tradition. Laparoscopic Colectomy. New York, NY: Churchill & Livingstone; 1995: 13-23.

Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS. Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991;1(3):144-50.

Bruce CJ, Coller JA, Murray JJ, Schoetz DJ, Roberts PL, Rusin LC, et al. Laparoscopic resection for diverticular disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39(10):S1-6.

Köhler L, Sauerland S, Neugebauer E. Diagnosis and treatment of diverticular disease: results of a consensus development conference. The Scientific Committee of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery. Surg Endosc. 1999;13(4):430-6.

Kaiser AM, Jiang JK, Lake JP, Ault G, Artinyan A, Gonzalez-Ruiz C, et al. The management of complicated diverticulitis and the role of computed tomography. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100(4):910-7.

Wasvary H, Turfah F, Kadro O, Beauregard W. Same hospitalization resection for acute diverticulitis. Am Surg. 1999;65(7):632-5.

Vanderpool D, Westmoreland MV, Fetner E. Achalasia: Willis or Heller? BUMC Proceeding. 1999;12(4):227-30.

Hoffman GC, Baker JW, Fitchett CW, Vansant JH. Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy. Initial experience. Ann Surg. 1994;219(6):732-40.

Downloads

Published

2023-04-29

Issue

Section

Case Reports