Which suture is ideal for abdominal fascial closure: polydioxanone or polypropylene?

Authors

  • Anjali Singla Department of General Surgery, PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India
  • A. R. Bansal Department of General Surgery, PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India
  • Vishal Chopra Department of Neurosurgery, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
  • Divyasha Chopra Department of General Surgery, PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India
  • Joy Bansal Department of General Surgery, MMU, Solan, Himachal Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20230970

Keywords:

Abdominal fascial closure, PDS, Polypropylene, Dehiscence, Incisional hernia

Abstract

Background: A secured fascial closure with appropriate suture material is an integral step to prevent complications in laparotomy. A costly post-operative complication is wound dehiscence which manifests as incisional hernia as a delayed complication. The present study compared prolene and polydioxanone (PDS) sutures in patients undergoing midline closure after emergency exploratory laparotomy with the aim to evaluate wound outcome after the use of either of the sutures.

Methods: Sixty-six patients undergoing emergency laparotomy were randomly divided into two groups: group A (PDS) and B (prolene). Wound complications were evaluated for each patient in terms of wound pain, wound discharge, burst abdomen, stitch sinus, stitch granuloma and incisional hernia.

Results: Wound pain was observed more in prolene group, p<0.05 till 3rd post-op day. Wound discharge, wound dehiscence and burst abdomen were more in prolene group, but the difference was statistically insignificant (p>0.05). Six patients developed incisional hernia, out of which 5 had prolene, (p>0.05). Similar statistically insignificant difference was found with stitch granuloma and stitch sinus.

Conclusions: Till date there is lack of agreement about the ideal suture for abdominal fascial closure. Present study concluded that any suture material is equally effective for abdominal fascial closure since there are many other factors contributing towards wound complications.

 

References

Anthimidis G, Gregoriou M, Stavrakis T, Vasiliadou K, Lyras I, Ioannidis K et al. New‐fangled slowly‐absorbable versus non‐absorbable sutures for abdominal fascial closure. Have the goals towards an advantageous suture been met? Surg Sci. 2013;4(6):32282.

Chayla PL, Massinde AN, Kihunrwa A, Mabula JB. Abdominal fascia closure following elective midline laparotomy: a surgical experience at a tertiary care hospital in Tanzania. BMC Res Notes. 2015;8:281.

Hodgson NC, Malthaner RA, Ostbye T. Current practice of abdominal fascial closure: a survey of Ontario general surgeons. Can J Surg. 2001;44(5):366‐70.

Tully L, Gates S, Brocklehurst P, McKenzie‐McHarg K, Ayers S. Surgical techniques used during caesarean section operations: results of a national survey of practice in the UK. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002;102:120‐6.

Rath AM, Chevrel P. The healing of laparotomies: review of the literature Part 1. Physiologic and pathologic aspects. Hernia. 1998;2:145-9.

Wound Dehiscence. Teach me surgery. Available at: https://teachmesurgery.com/perioperative/skin/wound-dehiscence/. Accessed on 20 January 2023.

Gaikwad V, Kapoor R, Thambudorai R. An ideal suture for midline abdominal closure? Indian J Surg. 2009;71(3):128-32.

Israelsson LA, Millbourn D. Closing midline abdominal incisions. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012;397:1201-7.

Van 't Riet M, Steyerberg EW, Nellensteyn J, Bonjer HJ, Jeekel J. Meta-analysis of techniques for closure of midline abdominal incisions. Br J Surg. 2002;89(11):1350-6.

Singal R, Kumar M, Kaushik N, Dhar S, Singh B. A comparative study of polydioxanone and nylon for abdominal wall closure with interrupted figure of eight in peritonitis cases. J Curr Surg. 2016;6(3-4):65-72.

Bloemen A, Van Dooren P, Huizinga BF, Hoofwijk AG. Randomized clinical trial comparing polypropylene or polydioxanone for midline abdominal wall closure. Br J Surg. 2011;98(5):633-9.

Wissing J, Van Vroonhoven TJ, Schattenkerk ME. Fascia closure after midline laparotomy: results of a randomized trial. Br J Surg. 1987;74(8):738-41.

Gys T, Hubens A. A prospective comparative clinical study between monofi lament absorbable and non-absorbable sutures for abdominal wall closure. Acta Chir Belg. 1989;89(5):265-70.

Carlson MA, Condon RE. Polyglyconate (Maxon) versus nylon suture in midline abdominal incision closure: a prospective randomized trial. Am Surg. 1995;61(11):980-83.

Leaper DJ, Allan A, May RE. Abdominal wound closure: a controlled trial of polyamide (nylon) and polydioxanone suture (PDS). Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1985;67(5):273-5.

Downloads

Published

2023-03-31

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles