Abdominal symptoms and its outcome in gallbladder diseases following routine and emergency cholecystectomy

Authors

  • Bhanumati Giridharan Department of General Surgery, ESIC Medical College and PGIMSR, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India
  • P. Madhivadhanam Department of General Surgery, ESIC Medical College and PGIMSR, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20170195

Keywords:

Early and delayed cholecystectomy, Symptoms

Abstract

Background: Gallstones constitute for the most common causes of biliary tract diseases in the adult population. The study thus aims to describe the persistence rate of abdominal symptoms in patients after elective cholecystectomy and to understand which symptoms, improve after cholecystectomy.

Methods: This observational study is based in Melmaruvatthur Medical College and Research Institute where 69 patients were a part of the study. A pre and post structured questionnaire was used to assess the decrease in the rate of symptoms. After fully informed and written consent the study participants were interviewed questioneired, examined according to the preformed and pretested proforma, patients with a clinical and ultrasonographic diagnosis of gallstones filled out a structured questionnaire on abdominal pain symptoms and functional gastrointestinal disorder before and at six months after cholecystectomy.

Results: From the observed chi square value of 9.315 and p value of 0.002 which is less than 0.01 so it is declared that there is an association between the cholecystectomy and symptoms in the post-surgical group.

Conclusions: The findings of the study thus suggest that while much of the findings lean toward ELC being better than DLC, the significance values show that no difference exist between the two. The study therefore states that more research is required to ascertain whether ELC or DLC is better at reducing the symptoms associated with gall bladder disease.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Bhanumati Giridharan, Department of General Surgery, ESIC Medical College and PGIMSR, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India

PROFORMA

 

 

Name of the Candidate: Dr.Bhanumati Giridharan

Date of Birth & Age:     10-11-1966      48 years

 

Qualification

College & Univ.

Year

Registration No. of UG & PG with date

Name of the State Medical Council

MBBS

 

Indra Gandhi Medical college and hospital  Nagpur 

Nagpur university

1989

57750

29/3/1996

TheTamilnadu Medical Council,Chennai

MS (General Surgery)     

 

Indra Gandhi Medical college and hospital  Nagpur 

Nagpur university

1992

57750

29/3/1996

TheTamilnadu Medical Council,Chennai

 

Present Designation:      Associate Professor 

Department:general surgery

College:      ESIC  PGIMSR Medical College and Hospital                   

City:    K.K.Nagar Tamilnadu 

Nature of appointment: Contract

Position

Name of Institution

    From

    To

Total Experience in year

 

Resident,registrar

 

 

Post M.S Registrar

Indra Gandhi Medical College and Hospital Nagpur

Indra Gandhi Medical College and Hospital Nagpur 

Feb  1990

 

 

 

Nov 1992

 Nov 1992

 

 

 

March 1993

 

2yrs 9 months

 

 

 

3 months

 

 

Locum Lecture

 

 

 

Assistant Professor

Indra Gandhi Medical College and Hospital Nagpur

 

 

SRM Medical College and Hospital

Potheri

 

   4-3-93

 

 

 

 

    2-2-2005

 

30-6-93

 

 

 

 

1-3-2010

 

 3 months

 

 

 

5years 1 month

 

 

 

Associate Professor

 

 

 

Associate Professor

 

 

 

 

Associate Professor

SRM Medical College and Hospital

Potheri

 

Melmaruvatthur Adhi Parashakti

Medical college and research center

 

ESIC PGIMSR KK Nagar

 

   1-3-2010

 

 

  21-12-2011

 

 

 

 

  22-05-2015

 

31-5-2011

 

 

22-5- 2015

 

 

 

 

Till date

 

1 years 3 month

 

 

4 years 7 month

 

 

 

 

11 months

References

Barbara L, Sama C, Morselli Labate AM, Taroni F, Rusticali AG, Festi D, et al. A population study on the prevalence of gallstone disease: the Sirmione Study. Hepatol. 1987;7(5):913-7.

Glambek I, Kvaale G, Arnesjö B, Søreide O. Prevalence of gallstones in a Norwegian population. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1987;22(9):1089-94.

Kratzer WK, Chele V, Mason RA, Hill V, Hay B, Haug C, et al. Gallstone prevalence in Germany the Ulm Gallbladder Stone Study. Dig Dis Sci. 1998;43(6):1285-91.

Loria P, Dilengite MA, Bozzoli M, Carubbi F, Messora R, Sassatelli R, et al. Prevalence rates of gallstone disease in Italy - The Chianciano population study. Eur J Epidemiol. 1994;10(2):143-50.

Attili a F, Carulli N, Roda E, Barbara B, Capocaccia L, Menotti A, et al. Epidemiology of gallstone disease in Italy: prevalence data of the Multicenter Italian Study on Cholelithiasis (M.I.COL.). Am J Epidemiol. 1995;141(2):158-65.

Davis CJ. A history of endoscopic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1992;2(1):16-23.

Gallbladder SS. Gallbladder and extrahepatic biliary system. In: Brunicardi F, Andersen D, Billiar T, Dunn D, Hunter J, Pollock R, editors. Principles of surgery. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2005:1194-120.

GREPCO. The epidemiology of gallstone disease in Rome, Italy. Part I. Prevalence data in men. The Rome Group for Epidemiology and Prevention of Cholelithiasis (GREPCO). Hepatol. 1988;8(4):904-6.

Berger M, Hartman OT. Food intolerance not related to gallstones. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2000;30(1):101-2.

Kraagg N, Thijs C, Knipschild P. Dyspepsia-how noisy are gallstones? A meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies of biliary pain, dyspeptic symptoms, and food intolerance. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1995;30(5):411-21.

Vetrhus M, Søreide O, Solhaug JH, Nesvik I, Søndenaa K. Symptomatic, non-complicated gallbladder stone disease. Operation or observation? A randomized clinical study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2002;37(7):834-9.

Persson GE. Expectant management of patients with gallbladder stones diagnosed at planned investigation. A prospective 5- to 7-year follow-up study of 153 patients. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1996;31(2):191-9.

Skouras C, Jarral O, Deshpande R, Zografos G, Habib N, Zacharakis E. Is early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis preferable to delayed surgery? Int J Surg. 2012;10(5):250-8.

de Mestral C, Rotstein OD, Laupacis A, Hoch JS, Zagorski B, Alali AS, et al. Comparative operative outcomes of early and delayed cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a population-based propensity score analysis. Ann Surg. 2014;259(1):10-5.

Gurusamy KS, Davidson C, Gluud C, Davidson BR. Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for people with acute cholecystitis. In: Gurusamy KS, editor. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd; 2013:CD005440.

Gutt CN, Encke J, Koninger J, Harnoss JC, Weigand K, Kipfmuller K, et al. Acute cholecystitis: early versus delayed cholecystectomy, a multicenter randomized trial ACDC study, NCT00447304. Ann Surg. 2013;258(3):385-93.

Özkardeş AB, Tokaç M, Dumlu EG, Bozkurt B, Çiftçi AB, Yetişir F, et al. Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a prospective, randomized study. Int Surg. 2014;99(1):56-61.

Papi C, Catarci M, Ambrosio L, Gili L, Koch M, Grassi GB, et al. Timing of cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis: A meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99(1):147-55.

Zafar SN, Obirieze A, Adesibikan B, Cornwell EE, Fullum TM, Tran DD. Optimal time for early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. JAMA Surg. 2015;150(2):129.

Fenster LF, Lonborg R, Thirlby RC, Traverso LW. What symptoms does cholecystectomy cure? Insights from an outcomes measurement project and review of the literature. Am J Surg. 1995;169(5):533-8.

Scriven MW, Burgess NA, Edwards EA, Morgan AR, Bundred NJ, Lewis MH. Cholecystectomy: a study of patient satisfaction. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1993;38(2):79-81.

Ros E, Zambon D. Postcholecystectomy symptoms. A prospective study of gall stone patients before and two years after surgery. Gut. 1987;28(11):1500-4.

Luman W, Adams WH, Nixon SN, Mcintyre IM, Hamer-Hodges D, Wilson G, et al. Incidence of persistent symptoms after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective study. Gut. 1996;39(6):863-6.

Bates T, Ebbs SR, Harrison M, A’Hern RP. Influence of cholecystectomy on symptoms. Br J Surg. 1991;78(8):964-7.

McMahon AJ, Ross S, Baxter JN, Russell IT, Anderson JR, Morran CG, et al. Symptomatic outcome 1 year after laparoscopic and minilaparotomy cholecystectomy: A randomized trial. Br J Surg. 1995;82(10):1378-82.

Ambe P, Weber SA, Christ H, Wassenberg D. Cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. How time-critical are the so called golden 72 hours? Or better golden 24 hours and silver 25–72 hour? A case control study. World J Emerg Surg. 2014;9(1):60.

Dar R, Salroo N, Matoo A, Sheikh R, Wani S, Gul R. Comparison of early and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: Experience from a single center. N Am J Med Sci. 2013;5(7):414-8.

Johannessen T, Petersen H, Kristensen P, Kleveland PM, Dybdahl J, Sandvik AK, et al. The intensity and variability of symptoms in dyspepsia. Scand J Prim Health Care. 1993;11(1):50-5.

Talley NJ, Newman P, Boyce PM, Paterson KJ, Owen BK. Initial validation of a bowel symptom questionnaire and measurement of chronic gastrointestinal symptoms in Australians. Aust N Z J Med. 1995;25(4):302-8.

Downloads

Published

2017-01-25

How to Cite

Giridharan, B., & Madhivadhanam, P. (2017). Abdominal symptoms and its outcome in gallbladder diseases following routine and emergency cholecystectomy. International Surgery Journal, 4(2), 575–581. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20170195

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles