Quality of life in adult patients with post-surgical oncological problems to an abdominoperineal resection
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20221914Keywords:
Abdominoperineal resection, Surgery, QualityAbstract
Abdominoperineal Resection is a method which has been used as the gold standard for the curative treatment of distal rectal cancer. Because it is classified as a radical and invasive surgery, we have considered the importance of assessing the long-term quality of life in patients which is its best alternative, in turn the degree of psychological impact for which patients could study. Among the factors that could contribute to the performance of the procedure are: that they are in a high-advanced stage, male sex, narrow pelvis, advanced age, and the alteration of the function of the preoperative sphincter to avoid postoperative incontinence. It is important to mention that unfortunately some of these risk factors are independent of a mto the post-surgical oncological prognosis. Incontinence, genitourinary function, pain,dysfunction xual, unpleasant odor and leaks, selflimitations in social activities and even repercussions on body image, reaching depressive symptoms and varying levels of anxiety, andthese complications are what we focus on because it represents aserious problem in the quality of life of the patient undergoing abdominoperineal resection.
References
Monastyrska E, Hagner W, Jankowski M, Glowacka I, Zegarska B, Zegarski W. Prospective assessment of the quality of life in patients treated surgically for rectal cancer with lower anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection. J Cancer Surg. 2016;20:1-7.
Papadakis A, Maxine, Stephen J. Current CMDT medical diagnosis and treatment. Elsevier McGraw-Hill; 2015.
Townsend m. Courtney. Surgery treaty. 19th ed. Mexico. Elsevier; 2014.
Souadka A, Majbar MA, Harroudi TE, Benkabbou A, Souadka A. Perineal pseudocontinent colostomy is safe and efficient technique for perineal reconstruction after abdominoperineal resection for rectal adenocarcinoma. BMC Surg. 2015;15:40.
Charles BF. Schwartz principles of surgery. 10th ed. Mexico. McGraw-Hill; 2015.
Warschkow R, Ebinger SM, Brunner W, Schmied BM, Marti L. Survival after Abdominoperineal and Sphincter-Preserving Resection in Nonmetastatic Rectal Cancer: A Population-Based Time-Trend and Propensity Score-Matched SEER Analysis. Gastroenterology Res Practice. 2017:1-12.
Bosma E, Pullens MJJ, de Vries J, Roukema JA. The state of health, anxiety and depressive symptoms following complicated and uncomplicated colorectal surgeries. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016;31:273-82.
Wang Y, Huang L, Song C. Laparoscopic vs open abdominoperineal resection in the multimodality management of low rectal cancers. World J Gastroenterol. 2015; 21(35):10174-83.
Martinović Z, Kovač D, Martinovic C, Martinović. Recurrences in stage II rectal carcinoma after curative resection alone: from the viewpoint of angiogenesis. World J Surg Oncol; 2016.
Wang X, Li D, Li L, Kong F, Pang L, Mai W. Meta-Analysis of Oncological Outcome After Abdominoperineal Resection or Low Anterior Resection for Lower Rectal Cancer. Pathol Oncol Res. 2015; 21(1):19-27.
Asplund D, Prytz M, Bock D, Haglind E, Angenete E. Persistent perineal morbidity is common following abdominoperineal excision for rectal cáncer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015;30:1563-70.
González E, Holm K, Wennström B, Haglind E, Angenete E. Self-reported wellbeing and body image after abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016;31:1711-7.
Cotte E, Villeneuve L, Passot G, Boschetti G, Bin-Dorel S, Francois Y, et al. GRECCAR 8: impact on survival of the primary tumor resection in rectal cancer with unresectable synchronous metastasis: a randomized multicentre study. BMC Cancer. 2015;15(1):38.
