A comparison of lateral internal sphincterotomy versus subcutaneous fissurectomy under local anaesthesia with 2% diltiazem gel in the management of chronic fissure in ano: prospective study

Authors

  • Arvind Shukla Department of Surgery, MGM Medical College and M. Y. Hospital, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
  • Abhay Brahmane Department of Surgery, MGM Medical College and M. Y. Hospital, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
  • Yogesh H. S. Department of Surgery, MGM Medical College and M. Y. Hospital, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
  • Kovarthanan P. Department of Surgery, MGM Medical College and M. Y. Hospital, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20221581

Keywords:

Lateral internal sphincterotomy, Sub-cutaneous fissurectomy, 2% Diltiazem gel

Abstract

 

Background: Anal fissure is one of the most common benign anorectal condition that is caused by an ulcer or breach in the anoderm of the anal canal. It causes very severe pain and discomfort and directly affects the quality of life. From the past, various surgical treatment modalities have been practised to bring complete cure and relief but have always been associated with secondary complications. The aim of the study was to compare efficacy of outcome of lateral internal sphincterotomy and subcutaneous fissurectomy with topical 2% diltiazem gel in the treatment of chronic fissure in ano.

Methods: 60 patients who were diagnosed with chronic anal fissure between 2019-2021 at MGM Medical College were undertaken in this study. Patients were selected randomly on alternate basis. Group A patients were subjected to subcutaneous fissurectomy under local anaesthesia with post-operative application of 2% diltiazem gel. Group B patients were subjected to LIS. Surgical wound infection, absenteeism from work, symptomatic relief were assessed and compared between the groups.

Results: There was no significant difference among both the study population in terms of age and gender. There was a statistically significant association between post-operative wound infection (p=0.011), number of work days lost (p=0.008) and satisfaction level (p=0.020).

Conclusions: LIS is still a better surgical choice for treating chronic anal fissures than subcutaneous fissurectomy with 2% diltazem gel, due to less complications, faster pain alleviation, and fewer missed work days.

 

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Arvind Shukla, Department of Surgery, MGM Medical College and M. Y. Hospital, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India

ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR

DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SURGERY

Abhay Brahmane, Department of Surgery, MGM Medical College and M. Y. Hospital, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India

ASSISTANT PROFESSOR

DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SURGERY

Yogesh H. S., Department of Surgery, MGM Medical College and M. Y. Hospital, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India

SURGERY RESIDENT - 3RD YEAR

DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SURGERY

Kovarthanan P., Department of Surgery, MGM Medical College and M. Y. Hospital, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India

SURGERY RESIDENT - 3RD YEAR

DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SURGERY

References

Bara BK, Mohanty SK, Behera SN, Sahoo AK, Swain SK. Fissurectomy Versus Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy in the Treatment of Chronic Anal Fissure: A Randomized Control Trial. Cureus. 2021;13(9):18363.

Dziki A, Trzcinski R, Langner E, Wronski W. New approaches to the treatment of anal fissure. Acta Chir Iugosl. 2002;49(2):73-5.

Wehrli H. Etiology, pathogenesis and classification of anal fissure. Swiss Surg. 1996;(1):14-7.

Bhardwaj R, Parker MC. Modern perspectives in the treatment of chronic anal fissures. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2007;89(5):472-8.

Salem AE, Mohamed EA, Elghadban HM, Abdelghani GM. Potential combination topical therapy of anal fissure: development, evaluation, and clinical study. Drug Deliv. 2018;25(1):1672-82.

Schouten WR, Briel JW, Auwerda JJ. Relationship between anal pressure and anodermal blood flow. The vascular pathogenesis of anal fissures. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;37(7):664-9.

Bennett RC, Goligher JC. Results of internal sphincterotomy for anal fissure. Br Med J. 1962;2(5318):1500-3.

Hoffmann DC, Goligher JC. Lateral subcutaneous internal sphincterotomy in treatment of anal fissure. Br Med J. 1970;3(5724):673-5.

Aziz A, Sheikh I, Mohammad S, Alam SN, Mazar S. Lateral subcutaneous internal sphincterotomy in chronic anal fissure: our experience. Pakistan Surg J. 2009;25(2):4.

Varadarajan MS, Sony PS, Anandan H. Prevalence and Clinical Presentation of Fissure-in-ANO in A Tertiary Care Centre. Int J Scientific Study. 2018;5(12):70-2.

Saiyad SA, Junaid ND, Mehjabeen F, Mohammad SA. Prevalence and risk factors of different ano rectal disorders among indoor patients having ano rectal complaints: an observational retrospective study. J Biol Sci Opin. 2018;6(1):9-12.

Mansoor KR. Prevalence of Fissure-in-Ano among the Patients of Anorectal Complaints Visiting Nium Hospital. J Community Med Health Educ. 2015;5:2161-711.

Narayan NVR, Jade R. A Comparative Study of Lateral Sphincterotomy and Local Application of 2% Diltiazem Gel in Treatment of Chronic Anal Fissure. J Evidence Based Med Healthcare. 2015;2:8586.

Chaudhary R, Dausage CS. Prevalence of Anal Fissure in Patients with Anorectal Disorders: A Single-centre Experience. JCDR. 2019;3(2):36-41.

Mousavi SR, Sharifi M, Mehdikhah Z. A comparison between the results of fissurectomy and lateral internal sphincterotomy in the surgical management of chronic anal fissure. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13(7):1279-82.

Dey D, Pai G. Prospective comparative study between lateral sphincterotomy and subcutaneous fissurectomy with topical 2% diltiazem gel in the treatment of chronic fissure in ano. Int Surg J 2019;6:2571-5.

Schouten WR, Briel JW, Auwerda JJ, Graaf EJ. Ischaemic nature of anal fissure. Br J Surg. 1996;83(1):63-5.

Hoffmann DC, Goligher JC. Lateral subcutaneous internal sphincterotomy in treatment of anal fissure. Br Med J. 1970;3(5724):673-5.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-27

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles