DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20221400
Published: 2022-05-26

Clinical outcomes of patients undergoing Desarda versus Lichtenstein mesh for inguinal hernia repair: our experience in Qazi Hussain Ahmed Medical Complex, Nowshera Pakistan

Kamran H. Khan, Waseem Y. Khan, Zahid Khan, Fazal Ghani, Syed S. A. Shah

Abstract


Background: The objective of this study was to compare the outcome of Desarda versus Lichtenstein mesh for surgical repair of inguinal hernia.

Methods: This randomized controlled trial was done at Qazi Hussain Ahmed Medical Complex, Nowshera from 01 February 2019 to 30 December 2020 with total duration 1 year and 10 months. Study included patients admitted in hospital for inguinal hernia repair. Patients were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 consisted of patients in whom Lichtenstein mesh repair was done while group 2 with patients having Desarda non-mesh repair done. Total time of surgery was noted. Patients were assessed for pain using a visual analog scale (VAS) after 72 hours and for seroma and infection within seven days. Recurrence and resumption of normal gait was assessed after 6 months. Data was analyzed with statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS) 21.

Results: Total of 100 male patients were included in the study. About 45 patients were included in group 1 and 55 in group 2. Mean age of the patients was 53±10.55 years in Lichtenstein group and 50±08.11 years in Desarda group. The mean duration of surgery was 47.57±4.95 min with Lichtenstein while 37.96±4.76 min with Desarda. The mean pain score was 2.5±1.0 after 72 hours with Lichtenstein while 1.72±0.20 with Desarda (p<0.05). Seroma was developed in 4 (8.8%) patients, infection in 5 (11.11%) patients and recurrence occurred in 1 (2.2%) patient in group 1 (Lichtenstein) while no patient developed infection in group 2 (Desarda). The rate of normal gait observed in 6 months post operative was in 25 (55.5%) patients with Lichtenstein repair while in group 2, 30 (54.54%) patents resumed normal gate respectively (p>0.05).

Conclusions: Both methods for repair are acceptable but the Desarda has less complications and operative time as compared to Lichtenstein repair.


Keywords


Inguinal hernia, Desarda non-mesh repair, Lichtenstein mesh repair, Recurrence, Seroma, Infection

Full Text:

PDF

References


Zendejas B, Ramirez T, Jones T, Kuchena A, Ali SM. Incidence of inguinal hernia repairs in Olmsted County, MN: A population-based study. Ann Surg. 2013;257(3):520-6.

Malangoni MA, Rosen MJ. Hernias. In: Townsend CM, Beauchamp RD, Evers BM, Mattox KL, editors. Sabiston Textbook of Surgery. 19th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders. 2012;46.

Ersoz F, Culcu S, Duzkoylu Y, Bektas H, Sari S, Arikan S, et al. The Comparison of Lichtenstein Procedure with and without Mesh-Fixation for Inguinal Hernia Repair. Surg Res Pract. 2016;8041515.

Bashir S, Afzal MO, Rafi Y. Desarda Technique for Inguinal Hernia Repair, a multicenter experience. PJMHS. 2015;9(1):311-3.

Kingsnorth A, Gray M, Nott D. Prospective randomized trial comparing the Shouldice technique and plication darn for inguinal hernia. Br J Surg. 1992;79(10):1068.

Porrero J, Sánchez-Cabezudo C, Bonachía O, LópezBuenadicha A, Sanjuánbenito A, Hidalgo M. Inguinofemoral hernia: multicenter study of surgical techniques. Cirugia Espanola. 2005;78(1):45-9.

Devlin BH, Kingsnorth A. Inguinal hernia in adults the operation. Management of Abdominal Hernias. 1998;2:141-66.

Read RC. Bendavid’s editorial and the role of defective collagen metabolism in anatomical variations. Hernia. 2004;8(3):285.

Rodríguez P, Herrera P, Gonzalez O, Alonso J, Blanco H. A randomized trial comparing Lichtenstein repair and no mesh Desarda repair for inguinal hernia: a study of 1382 patients. East and Central African J Surg. 2013;18(2):18-25.

Losanoff JE, Richman BW, Jones JW. Inguinal herniorrhaphy with an undetached strip of external oblique aponeurosis: old or new? Eur J Surg. 2001;167(11):877.

Roy BC, Hanifa A, Naher S, Baset A, Sarkar P, Outcome of desarda repair in inguinal hernia. A study in northern part of Bangladesh. Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2016;1:5(3):521-5.

Gedam BS, Bansod PY, Kale VB, Shah Y, Akhtar M. A comparative study of Desarda’s technique with Lichtenstein mesh repair in treatment of inguinal hernia: A prospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 2017;39:150-5.

Ahmed M, Manzoor F, Kausar R. Inguinal hernia: Clinical presentation and postoperative complications of patients when treated with Desarda technique. Ann Pak Inst Med Sci. 2017;13(1):3-6.

Manyilirah W, Kijjambu S, Upoki A. Comparison of non-mesh (Desarda) and mesh (Lichtenstein) methods for inguinal hernia repair among black African patients: a short-term double-blind RCT. Hernia. 2012;16(2):133-44.

Mitura K, Romańczuk M. Comparison between two methods of inguinal hernia surgery--Lichtenstein and Desarda. Polski merkuriusz lekarski: organ Polskiego Towarzystwa Lekarskiego. 2008;24(143):392-5.

Eklund A, Rudberg C, Smedberg S, Enander L, Leijonmarck C, Österberg J, et al. Short‐term results of a randomized clinical trial comparing Lichtenstein open repair with totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2006;93(9):1060-8.