Role of magnetic resonance imaging in detection of metastatic axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients

Authors

  • Rohit Singh Department of General Surgery, Pt. B. D. Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak- Haryana, India
  • Bhavinder Kumar Arora Department of General Surgery, Pt. B. D. Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak- Haryana, India
  • Vijay Pal Department of General Surgery, Pt. B. D. Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak- Haryana, India
  • Gourav Mittal Department of General Surgery, Pt. B. D. Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak- Haryana, India
  • Monika Shekhawat Department of General Surgery, Pt. B. D. Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak- Haryana, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20221153

Keywords:

Breast cancer, Breast malignancy, MRI, Axillary lymph nodes, Metastatic axillary lymph nodes

Abstract

Background: Magnetic resonance imaging has been evolved as a very important tool in diagnosing the axillary lymph nodes pre-operatively. In recent studies, in women with various risk profiles, the sensitivity ranges between 81% and 100%, which is approximately twice as high as the sensitivity of mammography.

Methods: This prospective study was performed at PGIMS, Haryana from December 2018 to March 2020. Total 30 patients (n=30) were included in the study. All the patients presenting with clinically palpable breast lump, underwent triple assessment test. All the patient underwent modified radical mastectomy and the final histopathological report of the specimen was then compared with the preoperative clinical and MRI assessment of the metastatic axillary lymph nodes.

Results: This study aimed at detection of axillary lymph node metastasis in breast malignancies by breast MRI. The sensitivity of this MRI came to be about 80.00%, specificity of about 80%, positive predictive value of about 95.24%, negative predictive value of about 44.44% and accuracy of about 80.0% with 95% confidence interval.

Conclusions: Magnetic resonance imaging is a very important investigation in detection of breast malignancies, their depth, muscles and skin involvement as well as axillary lymph node detection. Axillary lymph nodes can although be detected by clinical examination, but problem lies in their sensitivity and specificity as axillary lymph nodes of small size cannot be detected by clinical examination.

References

Mann RM, Kuhl CK, Moy L. Contrast-enhanced MRI for breast cancer screening. J Mag Reson Imag. 2019;50(2):377-90.

Loiselle C, Eby PR, Kim JN, Calhoun KE, Allison KH, Gadi VK, et al. Preoperative MRI improves prediction of extensive occult axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy. Acad Radiol. 2014;21:92-8.

Aitken E, Osman M. Factors affecting nodal status in invasive breast cancer. Breast J. 2010;16(3):271-8.

Grover VP, Tognarelli JM, Crossey MM, Cox IJ, Taylor-Robinson SD, McPhail MJ. Magnetic resonance imaging: principles and techniques: lessons for clinicians. J Clin Experiment Hepatol. 2015;5(3):246-55.

Martincich L, Montemurro F, De Rosa G, Marra V, Ponzone R, Cirillo S, et al. Monitoring response to primary chemotherapy in breast cancer using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2004;83(1):67-76.

Rieber AB, Brambs HJ, Gabelmann A, Heilmann V, Kreienberg R, Kühn T. Breast MRI for monitoring response of primary breast. J Clin Experiment Hepatol. 2015;5(3):246-55.

Arslan G, Altintoprak KM, Yirgin IK, Atasoy MM, Celik L. Diagnostic accuracy of metastatic axillary lymph nodes in breast MRI. Springerplus. 2016;5(1):735.

Kuijs VJ, Moossdorff M, Schipper RJ, Beets-Tan RG, Heuts EM, Keymeulen KB, et al. The role of MRI in axillary lymph node imaging in breast cancer patients: a systematic review. Insights Imag. 2015;6:203-15.

Schipper RJ, Paiman ML, Beets-Tan RG, Nelemans PJ, de Vries B, Heuts EM, et al. Diagnostic performance of dedicated axillary T2-and diffusion-weighted MR imaging for nodal staging in breast cancer. Radiol. 2015;275(2):345-55.

Zaiton F, Shehata SM, Warda MH, Alekrashy MA. Diagnostic value of MRI for predicting axillary lymph nodes metastasis in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients: Diffusion-weighted MRI. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med. 2016;47(2):659-67.

Fuster D, Duch J, Paredes P, Velasco M, Munoz M, Santamaría G, et al. Preoperative staging of large primary breast cancer with [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography compared with conventional imaging procedures. J Clinical Oncol. 2008;26(29):4746-51.

Krammer J, Wasser K, Schnitzer A, Henzler T, Schoenberg SO, Kaiser CG, et al. Axillary lymph node characterization in breast cancer patients using magnetic resonance mammography: a prospective comparative study with FDG PET-CT and healthy women. Eur J Radiol. 2013;82(12):2194-8.

Li C, Meng S, Yang X, Wang J, Hu J. The value of T2* in differentiating metastatic from benign axillary lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer-A preliminary in vivo study. PloS one. 2014;9(1):45-9.

He N, Xie C, Wei W, Pan C, Wang W, Lv N, et al. A new, preoperative, MRI-based scoring system for diagnosing malignant axillary lymph nodes in women evaluated for breast cancer. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81(10): 2602-12.

Wang J, Liao Q, Zhang Y, Yu C, Bai R, Sun H. Differential diagnosis of axillary inflammatory and metastatic lymph nodes in rabbit models by using diffusion-weighted imaging: compared with conventional magnetic resonance imaging. Korean J Radiol. 2012;13(4):458-66.

Yoshimura G, Sakurai T, Oura S, Suzuma T, Tamaki T, Umemura T, et al. Evaluation of axillary lymph node status in breast cancer with MRI. Breast Cancer. 1999; 6(3):249-58.

Gentilini O, Veronesi U. Abandoning sentinel lymph node biopsy in early breast cancer? A new trial in progress at the European Institute of Oncology of Milan (SOUND: Sentinel node vs Observation after axillary UltraSouND). Breast. 2012;21(5):678-81.

Downloads

Published

2022-04-26

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles