DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20221147
Published: 2022-04-26

A retrospective analysis of outcome of endoscopic management in choledocholithiasis in a tertiary care centre

Dhvani Shah, Rajesh Mahey, Satish Dharap, Priyanka Chilbule, Hiranya Deka

Abstract


Background: The role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) as a therapeutic intervention for choledocholithiasis is long established. Endoscopic therapy involves stone extraction using conventional methods after performing endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. The objective of this study was to determine the outcome of patients with choledocholithiasis being treated in our setup.

Methods: This retrospective observational study was conducted at T.N.M.C. and BYL Nair Hospital, Mumbai from January 2017 to October 2017. All patients with choledocholithiasis proven radiologically were admitted. All patients underwent elective endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. In patients in whom ERCP failed, open surgical clearance of the common bile duct was done.

Results: A total of 50 cases of choledocholithiasis were admitted during the study period. Age distribution in our study was from 27 years to 81 years of which, 46% were males and 54% were females. Successful clearance of CBD with balloon sweep, dormia basket, CBD stenting or sphincterotomy alone was done in 38 patients (76%). Nine patients (18%) required repeat ERCP/ more than one sitting for clearance of CBD. Most of the patients had stone size of >10 mm (8 out of 9 patients i.e. 88.89%). Three patients were referred for surgical intervention due to non-retrieval of calculus. All these patients had stone size >15 mm (100%).

Conclusions: In our study 94% patients eventually achieved successful clearance with ERCP. Also, the size of the stone was an independent risk factor that affected the outcome of ERCP.

 


Keywords


Choledocholithiasis, ERCP, CBD, Sphincterotomy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bhattacharya S. The pancreas in Bailey & love‘s short practice of surgery, 26th ed. United States: Hodder Arnold; 2005:1120.

Saharia PC. Primary Common Duct Stones. Ann Surg. 1977;598-602.

Madden JL. Common duct stones. Their origin, and surgical management. Surg Clin North Am.1973;53:1095-113.

Giannini A. Liver enzyme alteration: a guide for clinicians. CMAJ. 2005;172(3):45-9.

Deitch EA. The reliability and clinical limitations of sonographic scanning of bile ducts Ann Surg. 1981.

Beckingham IJ. Investigations of liver and biliary disease. BMJ. 2001;322:33-6.

Neoptolemos JP, Carr-Locke DL, Fossard DP. Prospective randomised study of preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy versus surgery alone for common bile duct stones. Br Med J. 1987;294(6570):470-4.

Binmoeller KF. Treatment of difficult bile duct stones using mechanical, electrohydraulic and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Endoscopy. 1993;25(3):201-6.

Leese T, Neoptolemos JP, Carr-Locke DL. Successes, failures, early complications and their management following endoscopic sphincterotomy: results in 394 consecutive patients from a single centre. Br J Surg. 1985;72:215-9.

Prachayakul V, Aswakul P. Failure of sequential biliary stenting for unsuccessful common bile duct stone removal. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;5(6):288-92.

Stefanidis G. Endoscopic extraction of large common bile duct stones: A review article. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;4(5):167-79.

Trikudanathan G. Endoscopic management of difficult common bile duct stones. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(2):165-73.

Yasuda I, Itoi T. Recent advances in endoscopic management of difficult bile duct stones. Digest Endos. 2013;25:376-85.

Korman J, Cosgrove J, Furman M, Nathan I, Cohen J. Role of ERCP and cholangiography in laparoscopic era. Ann Surg. 1996;223(2):212-6.

Onken JE, Brazer SR, Eisen GM, Williams DM, Bouras EP, DeLong ER, et al. Predicting the presence of choledocholithiasis in patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis. Am J Gastroenterol. 1996;91:762-7.

Sutton VR. Using 4-hr post ERCP amylase level to predict post ERCP pancreatitis. J Pancreas; 2011;12(4):372-6.

Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, Haber GB, Herman ME, Dorsher PJ, et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:909-18.

Szary NM. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: how to avoid and manage them. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;9(8):496-504.

Rabie ME. Operative and non-operative management of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-associated duodenal injuries. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2013;95(4):285-90.

Kwak MS, Jang ES, Ryu JK, Kim YT, Yoon YB, Park JK. Risk factors of post endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography bacteremia. Gut Liver. 2013;7:228-33.

Hussain Issa et al. Migration of a biliary stent causing duodenal perforation and biliary peritonitis. World J Gastrointest Endosc. Oct 16, 2013;5(10):523-6.

Khawaja A. Basketing a basket: A novel emergency rescue technique. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;4(9):429-31.

Benjaminov L. Consecutive versus separate sessions of EUS and ERCP for symptomatic choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:2117-21.

Saluja SS. Differentiation between benign and malignant hilar obstruction using laboratory and radiological investigations: a prospective study. HPB. 2007;9:373-82.

Thornton JR. Value of US & LFTs in determining need for ERCP in unexplained abdominal pain. Gut. 1992;33:1559-61.

Singh A. Diagnostic accuracy of MRCP as compared to ultrasound/CT in patients with obstructive jaundice. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(3);103-7.

Sahoo R. A randomized study on single stage laparo-endoscopic rendezvous procedure versus two stage approach for the management of cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis. J Min Access Surg. 2014;10:139-43.

Swan MP. Failed biliary cannulation: clinical and technical outcomes after tertiary referral ERCP. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17(5): 4993-8.

Lauri R. Endoscopic extraction of bile duct stones: management related to stone size. Gut. 1993;34:1718-21.

Liu TH, Consorti ET, Kawashima A, Tamm EP, Kwong KL, Gill BS, et al. Patient evaluation and management with selective use of magnetic resonance cholangiography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg. 2001;234:33-40.

Anthony T. Intraprocedural quality in Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108(11):58-62.

Katsinelos R. Risk factors for therapeutic ERCP related complications: an analysis of 2715 cases performed by single endoscopist. Annals of Gastroenterol. 2014;27:65-72.