DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20220322
Published: 2022-01-29

Enteric perforation with peritonitis

Sohan Lal Meghwal, M. L. Maida, Arjun Lal Kharadi, Mayur Kumar Pargi

Abstract


Background: Typhoid fever, also known as enteric fever, is a systemic infection by Salmonella typhi or by the related but less virulent Salmonella paratyphi. Patient with perforation present with sign and symptoms of peritonitis complains of pain abdomen along with distension abdomen, obstipation and vomiting. Enteric perforation in managed surgically. Aims and objective: To study various epidemiological factors in relation with enteric perforation with peritonitis and to compare the outcomes of various procedures of enteric perforation with peritonitis.

Methods: The present study was performed on 50 patients of enteric perforation with peritonitis admitted in various surgical wards of RNT medical college hospital, Udaipur. Those patients who underwent conservative treatment or drainage under local anesthesia were not included in this study.

Results: Enteric perforation was more common in young males, maximum cases were in 3rd decade followed by 2nd and 4th. Male:female ratio was 1:77:1. Most common symptoms were acute pain abdomen and fever. Constipation (60%) abdominal distension (40%) and vomiting (52%) were other predominate complains. Simple repair of perforation was done in 25 patients. Repair was done in double layer (inner layer) by continuous vicryl and outer by interrupted silk. Mortality was 14%, almost equal irrespective to procedure chosen for management of enteric perforation peritonitis.

Conclusions: To deal with enteric perforation(s) operative procedure has to be decided to greater caution taking into consideration patient’s general condition, gut condition, number and site of perforation and contamination of peritoneal cavity.

 


Keywords


Typhoid, Enteric perforation, Salmonella typhi, Gut, Site of perforation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agrawal SC. Chloramphenical resistance of species in the India 1959 61. WHO Bulletin. 1962;27-33.

Ajao G. Typhoid perforation: Factor affecting mortality and morbidity. Int Surg. 1982;67:371 9.

Bailey H, Mechnell L. Short Practice of Surgery 14th Ed. 1958;910.

Butler T, Knight J, Nath SK. Typhoid fever complicated by intestinal perforation : A persisting fatal Disease requiring surgical management. Review of infections Dis. 1985;7:244256.

Olurin EO, Ajay OO, Bohrer SP. Typhoid perforation J. Royal Coll. Surg. 1972;12:253 6.

Eggleston FC, Santoshi B. Typhoid perforation, Choice of operation. BJS. 1981;68:341 42.

Kohli JS, Singh KP. Choice of surgical procedure in typhoid perforation. JIMA. 1991;89(1):255 6.

Edino ST, Mohammed AZ, Uba AF, Sheshe AA, Anumah M, Ochicha O, et al. Typhoid enteric perforation in north western Nigeria. Niger J Med. 2004;13(4):345-9.

Baliga AV. Surgical Complication of Typhoid. I J Surg. 1949;11:166 77.

Shah AA, Wani KA, Wazir BS. The ideal treatment of the typhoid enteric perforation-resection anastomosis. Int Surg. 1999;84(1):35-8.

Vyas PM. A study of 15 cases of intestinal perforation in enteric fever. Indian J Surg. 1964;26:1-8.

Prakash A, Mittal RN, Ashray SM. Perforation in typhoid enteritis. Surgical J New Delhi. 1972;19.

Purohit PG. Surgical treatment of typhoid perforation. ITS. 1978;40:227-38.

Mehta VP. Intestinal perforation in enteric fever based on study of 169 cases. Indian J Surg. 1953;4(15):235.

Chauhan M.K. and Pande S.K. A review of 344 patients with typhoid Perforation. Br J Surg. 1982;69:173 5.

Akgun Y, Bac B, Boylu S, Aban N, Tacyildiz I. Typhoid enteric perforation. Br J Surg. 1997;84(4):584-5.

Sahoo SP, Shukla VK, Chauhan VS, Pandey M, Gautam A. Enteric perforation--single-layer closure. Dig Dis Sci. 2004 ;49(1):161-4.

Venketramani Sitararn BV, Moses AS, Khanduri FP. Typhoid perforation A retrospective study. Ann Royal College Surgeon Eng. 1990;72:347 9.