Early enteral feeding in patients with gastrointestinal surgery time to send the patient home early

Authors

  • Deepak Kumar Soni Department of General Surgery, L. N. Medical College, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
  • Shrikant Sharma Department of General Surgery, L. N. Medical College, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
  • Shehtaj Khan Department of General Surgery, L. N. Medical College, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20220629

Keywords:

Early enteral feedings, Conventional method feeding, Anastomotic site leak, Infection

Abstract

Background: There has been a trend among surgeons to delay enteral feeding following gastrointestinal surgery so that complications like anastomotic site leak and infection can be prevented and also to give time for operated site to heal. Newer studies suggest that early enteral feeding is useful in comparison to conventional method of feeding i.e. waiting for bowel function to return. This study was undertaken to evaluate the safety and tolerability of early enteral feeding after gastrointestinal surgeries in terms of postoperative complications and length of hospitalization.

Methods: This study was prospective observational study with retrospective controls done over a period of 18 months at a tertiary care center in India. 35 patients were included in each group (case versus control). Early enteral feeding was defined as commencement of oral feed within 48 hours of surgery. The data was analyzed using statistical package of social science (SPSS Version 20; Chicago Inc., USA).

Results: Both groups were found to be well matched in terms of age and sex distribution. The mean hospital stay for patients given early enteral feeding was significantly lower as compared to controls (10.26±3.09 versus 13.4±2.186). They had a complication rate of 11.4 % as compared to late enteral feeding group (25.7%).

Conclusions: Early enteral feeding has been found beneficial in most of the studies worldwide. Hence, it is time to open our minds and embrace it to improve surgical outcome in gastrointestinal surgery practice.

References

Lewis SJ, Egger M, Sylvester PA, Thomas S. Early Enteral feeding versus “nil by mouth” after gastrointestinal surgery: Systemic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. British medical journal. 2001;323(7316):773.

Moss G. Maintenance of gastrointestinal function after bowel surgery and immediate Enteral full nutrition. Clinical experience with objective demonstration of intestinal absorption and motility. Journal of Parenteral Enteral nutrition. 1981;215-20.

Schroeder D, Gillanders L, Mahr K, Hil GL. Effect of immediate postoperative enteral nutrition on body composition, muscle function and wound healing. Journal of Parenteral Nutrition. 1991;15:376-83.

Hayden DA, Hill GA. Impaired wound healing in patients with varying degrees of malnutrition. Journal of Parenteral Enteral nutrition. 1986;10:550-4.

Mcwhirter JP, Pennington CR. Incidence and recognition of malnutrition in hospital patient British medical journal. 1994;945-8.

Martens MF, de Man BM, Hendriks T, GorisRJ, Collagen synthetic capacity throughout the uninjured and anastomosed intestinal wall. American journal of surgery. 1992;164:354-60.

Navneet K, Gupta MK, Minocha VR. Early enteral feeding by nasoenteric tubes in patients with perforation peritonitis. World journal of surgery. 2005;29(8):1023-7.

Ahmet D. A randomized controlled trial evaluating early versus traditional oral feeding after colorectal surgery. Clinics. 2001;66(12):2001-5.

Tong Z. Early removing gastrointestinal decompression and early oral feeding improve patients’ rehabilitation after colorectostomy. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12(15):2459.

Andersen, Keinke H, Lewis SJ, Thomas S. Early enteral nutrition within 24h of colorectal surgery versus later commencement of feeding for postoperative complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;4.CD004080.

Marwah S, Godara R, Goyal R, Marwah N, Karwasara R. Early enteral nutrition following gastrointestinal anastomosis. IJGE. 2007;7(1).

Chatterjee S, Bala SK, Chakraborty P. A comparative study between early enteral feeding (within 24 hours) versus conventional enteral feeding after enteric anastomosis. Bangladesh J Med Sci. 2012;11(04):273-83.

Ahmad M, Qayyum A, Akhtar M, Shah R, Afridi S, Alam S, et al. Safety of early versus delayed enteral feeding following ileostomy closure: Randomized controlled trial. Khyber Med Univ J. 2013;5(4):195-8.

Prakash S, Saravanan PS, Hussain A, Prabha C. Safety of Early Oral Feeding After Open Appendicectomy. IOSR-JDMS. 2014;13(9):46-54.

Bajwa RS. A prospective randomized controlled study: early enteral nutrition following gastrointestinal surgery. Int Surg J. 2017;4:3249-56.

Thapa PB. Early Enteral Feeding in Intestinal Anastomosis. J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2011;9(18):1-5

Lee HS, Shim H, Jang JY, Lee H, Lee JG. Med J. 2014;55(2):395-400.

Kishore K, Nirhale DS, Athavale VS, Goenka GG, Calcuttawala MA. Early Enteral feeding within 24 hoursof gastrointestinal surgery versus Nil by mouth: A prospective study. Med J DY Patil Univ. 2014;7:173-6.

Dorai D, Kumar JL, Chitra T, Prasanna G. Effects of early enteral nutrition on patients after emergency and elective gastrointestinal surgery. IAIM. 2016;3(8):1-10.

Frederick MA. Early enteral feeding, compared with parenteral, reduces postoperative septic complications. The results of a meta-analysis. Annals Surg. 2016;2(1992):172.

Downloads

Published

2022-02-28

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles