Role of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in conjunction with 3D assessment in patients of different billiary obstruction causes

Authors

  • Suheel U. Rahman Department of Radiology Govt Medical College, Srinagar, Kashmir, India
  • Rassieq A. Dar Department of Radiology Govt Medical College, Srinagar, Kashmir, India
  • Basit A. Wani Department of Radiology Govt Medical College, Srinagar, Kashmir, India
  • Sajad A. Dar Department of Radiology Govt Medical College, Srinagar, Kashmir, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20220633

Keywords:

2D MRCP, 3DMRCP, Biliary obstruction, MIP, Choledocholithiasis

Abstract

Background: Conventional 2d MRCP has pitfalls which may stimulate or mask various pathologic conditions of extrahepatic ducts or pancreatic duct, to overcome this a number of new modern techniques are being used.

Methods: Observational study carried out in Government Medical College Srinagar including a total of 50 patients.

Results: Gallstone disease was the most common etiology responsible for biliary obstruction. Both Malignant and Benign strictures, IHBR dilatation and pancreatic duct dilatation were better appreciated by 3D MRCP than 2D MRCP.

Conclusions: In patients with biliary obstruction, MRCP aims at finding the pathology. It also helps in planning of surgical or interventional management and serves to guide these procedures with 3D MRCP definitely having advantages.  

References

Scharsschmidt GF, Goldberg HI, Schmid R. Approach to the patient with cholestatic jaundice. NEJM. 1983;308:1515-9.

Shukla S, Kharat PR. Clinicopathological study on patients presenting with obstructive jaundice. Int Surg J. 2018;5:705-10.

Surgery of the Liver, Biliary Tract, and Pancreas. Saunders Elsevier. 4th Edition, Pg. No 519.

Surgery of the Liver, Biliary Tract, and Pancreas. Saunders Elsevier. 4th Edition, Pg. No 519.

Maingot’s abdominal operations. McGraw Hill Medical.11th Edition, Pg. No. 887.

Friedman AC. Radiology of the liver, biliary tract, pancreas, and spleen. Baltimore: Wilhams& Wilkins. 1987;899-910.

Singh A, Mann HS. Diagnostic Accuracy of MRCP as Compared to Ultrasound/CT in Patients with Obstructive Jaundice. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(3):103-7.

Hemant T. Ankur JS. MR Cholangiopancreatography at 3.0 T. Radio Graphics. 2009;29:1689-706.

Christine H, Louisa A. Normal and Pathologic Features of the Postoperative Biliary Tract at 3D MR Cholangio-pancreatography and MR Imaging Radio Graphics. 2006;26(6):1603-21.

Reinhold C, Bret PM. Current status of MR cholangio-pancreatography. Am J Roentgenol. 1996;166:1285-95.

Kavita GF, Onofrio AC, Dushyant VS. Review: advances in MRCP from morphology to functional imaging. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2007;17:247-5A.

Sodickson A, Mortelekj, Tempany CM. Three dimensional fast recovery fast spin echo comparison with 2d single shot fast spin echo technique. RSNA. 2006;238.

Jingbo Z. Isotropic 3D T2-Weighted MR Cholangiopancreatography with Parallel Imaging. AJR 2006;187:1564-70.

Morimoto K, Shimoi M, Shirakawa T. Biliary obstruction evaluation with 3 dimensional MRCP. Radiology. 1992;183:578-80.

Meena S, Sunita P, Vivek B, Pradeep G. Role of MRCP in Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Causes of Biliary Obstruction. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2015;9(11):TC08-12.

Hasan DI, Almassry HN. Magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography in conjunction with 3D for assessment of different biliary obstruction causes. The Egyptian journal of radiology and nuclear medicine. 2010;483-9.

Prabakar A, Raj RS. Obstructivejaundice: a clinical study. J. Evolution Med Dent Sci. 2016;5(28):1423-9.

Prabakar A, Raj RS. Obstructive jaundice: a clinical study.J. Evolution Med. Dent. Sci. 2016;5(28):1423-1429.

Prabakar A, Raj RS. Obstructive jaundice: a clinical study. J. Evolution Med. Dent. Sci. 2016;5(28):1423-1429.

Coucke EM, Akbar H, Kahloon A. Biliary Obstruction. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. 2020.

Zidi SH, Prat F, Guen OL. Use of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: prospective comparison with a reference imaging method. Gut. 1999;44:118-22.

Jorge A. Soto, MD Matthew A. Detection of Choledocholithiasis: Comparison of MR Cholangiographic Sequences. Radiology. 2000;215:737-45.

Calvo MM, Bujanda L. Magnetic resonance cholangiography versus ultrasound in the evaluation of the gallbladder. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2002;34(3):233-36.

Griffin N, Charles-Edwards G, Grant LA. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: the ABC of MRCP. Insights Imaging. 2012;3(1):11-21.

Bhatt C, Shah PS, Prajapati HJ, Modi J. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy between USG and MRCP in biliary and pancreatic pathology. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2005;15:177-81.

Romagnuolo J, Bardou M, Rahme E. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: A meta-analysis of test performance in suspected biliary disease. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139:547-57.

Angulo P, Pearce DH, Johnson CD, Henry JJ, LaRusso NF, Petersen BT et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiography in patients with biliary disease: its role in primary sclerosing cholangitis. J Hepatol. 2000;33(4):520-7.

Prabakar A, Raj RS. Obstructive jaundice: a clinical study. J Evolution Med Dent Sci. 2016;5(28):1423-9.

Matsunaga K, Ogasawara G, Fujii K. Usefulness of the Navigator-echo triggering Technique for Free-Breathing 3D MRCP. ECR. 2014;1257-8.

Uthar, Purohit M, Bhargav S, Goyal V. Role of MRCP in Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Causes of Biliary Obstruction. 2015;9(11):TC08-12.

Downloads

Published

2022-02-28

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles