Intravesical prostatic protrusion and prostate volume in patients with acute urine retention
Keywords:Benign prostatic hyperplasia, Intravesical prostatic protrusion, Acute urinary retention
Background: To study the prevalence of significant Intravesical Prostatic Protrusion (IPP) in patients presenting with acute urinary retention (AUR) due to Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and to study the correlation between intravesical prostatic protrusion and prostatic volume.
Methods: We assessed 68 men between the ages 45 to 85 who presented with acute urinary retention. Initial assessment included detailed clinical history, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and Quality of Life assessments and a transabdominal ultrasonogram to measure Prostate Volume (PV) and Intravesical Prostatic Protrusion (IPP). The degree of IPP was determined by the distance from the tip of the protrusion to the circumference of the bladder at the base of the prostate gland. Patients with IPP >10 mm were taken have significant IPP and those ≤10 mm was taken to be insignificant. Statistical analysis included descriptive analysis and Pearson’s correlation coefficient.
Results: Of the 68 patients in our study with resented with AUR, 29 patients (42.9%) had significant IPP. Mean IPP was 9.81mm with a standard deviation of 5.41 mm. All patients with significant IPP had a severe IPPS grade. IPP had a statistically significant correlation with prostatic volume.
Conclusions: The IPP as assessed by transabdominal ultrasound can be used to direct appropriate patients to more aggressive treatment strategies like surgery.
Hossain AKMS, Alam AKMK, Habib AKMK, Rashid MM, Rahman H, Islam AKMA. Comparison between prostate volume and intravesical prostatic protrusion in detecting bladder outlet obstruction due to benign prostatic hyperplasia. Bangladesh Medical Research Council Bulletin. 2012;38(1):14-7.
Dubey D, Kapoor R, Muruganandham K. Acute urinary retention in benign prostatic hyperplasia: Risk factors and current management. Indian Journal of Urology. 2007;23(4):347.
Nose H, Foo KT, Lim KB, Yokoyama T, Ozawa H, Kumon H. Accuracy of two noninvasive methods of diagnosing bladder outlet obstruction using ultrasonography: Intravesical prostatic protrusion and velocity-flow video urodynamics. Urology. 2005;65(3):493-7.
Sigdel G, Belokar WK. Clinical Significance of Intravesical Prostatic Protrusion in Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Journal of Universal College of Medical Sciences. 2015;3(1):6-10.
Thomas K, Oades G, Taylor-Hay C, Kirby RS. Acute urinary retention: what is the impact on patients’ quality of life? BJU International. 2005;95(1):72-6.
Lim KO, Henry FOO, Keongtatt W, Michael LC, Stephanie FC. Comparison of intravesical prostatic protrusion, prostate volume and serum prostatic-specific antigen in the evaluation of bladder outlet obstruction. International Journal of Urology. 2020;13(12):1509-13.
Kim KH, Kim YS. Correlation of Male Overactive Bladder with Intravesical Prostatic Protrusion. Korean Journal of Urology. 2010;51(12):843.
Keqin Z, Zhishun X, Jing Z, Haixin W, Dongqing Z, Benkang S. Clinical Significance of Intravesical Prostatic Protrusion in Patients with Benign Prostatic Enlargement. Urology. 2007;70(6):1096-9.
Lee LS, Sim HG, Lim KB, Wang D, Foo KT. Intravesical prostatic protrusion predicts clinical progression of benign prostatic enlargement in patients receiving medical treatment. International Journal of Urology. 2009;17(1):69-74.
Gyawali P, Shrestha G, Joshi B, Chalise P, Sharma U. Intravesical Prostatic Protrusion is better than Prostate Volume in Predicting Symptom Severity in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Prospective Clinical Study. Post-Graduate Medical Journal of NAMS. 2010;10(02).
Chia SJ, Heng CT, Chan SP, Foo KT. Correlation of intravesical prostatic protrusion with bladder outlet obstruction. BJU International. 2003;91(4):371-4.
Cumpanas AA, Botoca M, Minciu R, Bucuras V. Intravesical Prostatic Protrusion Can Be a Predicting Factor for the Treatment Outcome in Patients With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Due to Benign Prostatic Obstruction Treated With Tamsulosin. Urology. 2013;81(4):859-63.
Mariappan P, Brown DJG, McNeill AS. Intravesical Prostatic Protrusion is Better Than Prostate Volume in Predicting the Outcome of Trial Without Catheter in White Men Presenting With Acute Urinary Retention: A Prospective Clinical Study. Journal of Urology. 2007;178(2):573-7.
Franco G, De Nunzio C, Leonardo C, Tubaro A, Ciccariello M, De Dominicis C et al. Ultrasound Assessment of Intravesical Prostatic Protrusion and Detrusor Wall Thickness—New Standards for Noninvasive Bladder Outlet Obstruction Diagnosis? Journal of Urology. 2010;183(6):2270-4.
Lee JM, Chung H, Kim TW, Kim HS, Wang JH, Yang SK. The Correlation of Intravesical Prostatic Protrusion with Storage Symptoms, as Measured by Transrectal Ultrasound. Korean Journal of Urology. 2008;49(2):145.
Reis LO, Barreiro GC, Baracat J, Prudente A, D’Ancona CA. Intravesical protrusion of the prostate as a predictive method of bladder outlet obstruction. International Braz j Urol. 2008;34(5):627-37.
Kuo HC. The clinical prostate score for diagnosis of bladder outlet obstruction by prostate measurements and uroflowmetry. Urology. 1999:54(1):90-6.