DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20220330

A comparative study of use of polypropylene and composite mesh in inguinal hernia repair

Amandeep Singh, Sudhir Khichy, Shourabh Sinha, Sonam Singh, Haramritpal Kaur, Jaskaran Singh, Sunil Kumar

Abstract


Background: Hernia most probably has been a disease ever since mankind existed. Repair of inguinal hernia is one of the commonest surgical procedures worldwide. Currently, about one million meshes are used per year world-wide for hernia repair. Therefore, surgical repair of hernia is a hot area of research for keeping the recurrence rates low with few complications using an ideal mesh material. The aim of the study was to compare the use of Polypropylene mesh and Composite mesh in patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair.

Methods: A total of 60 patients of either gender were enrolled in the study and followed upto8 weeks. Out of 60, 30 patients were offered Polypropylene mesh hernioplasty and in rest 30 patients Lichtenstein hernioplasty with composite mesh was done. Postoperative analysis was made in terms of postoperative pain, complications and recurrence.

Results: Both the groups were comparable in terms of age and gender. Post-operative pain at 24 hours was considerably lower in patients undergoing hernia repair using Composite mesh than with Polypropylene mesh group. However, most of the post-operative complications were comparable in early post-operative period and on subsequent follow up visits in both groups.

Conclusions: Polypropylene mesh and composite mesh were comparable in terms of ease of mesh placement and post-operative complications in patients of inguinal hernia repair.


Keywords


Polypropylene, Composite, Hernia, Hernioplasty

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bax T, Sheppard BC, Crass RA. Surgical Options in the Management of Groin Hernias. Am Fam Physician. 1999;59(1):143-56.

Rutkow I. Epidemiologic, economic, and sociologic aspects of hernia surgery in the United States in the 1990s. Surg Clin North Am. 1998;78(6):941-51.

Rutkow M, Robbins AW. Demographic, classificatory, and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States. Surg Clin North Am. 1993;73(3):413-26.

Franz MG. The Biology of Hernia Formation. Surg Clin North Am. 2008;88(1):1-15.

Leblanc KE, Leblanc LL, Leblanc KA. Inguinal hernias: Diagnosis and management. Am Fam Physician. 2013;87(12):844-8.

Udwadia TE. Inguinal hernia repair: The total picture. J Minim Access Surg. 2006;2(3):144-6.

Schumpelick V, Klinge U, Rosch R. Light weight mesh in inguinal hernia repair. Min Access Surg. 2006;2(3):117.

Scott N, Go PM, Graham P. Open mesh versus non-mesh for groin hernia repair. CDSR. 2001;4:3

Jorgensen LN, Sommer T, Assaadzadeh S, Strand L, Dorfelt A, Hensler M, et al. Randomized clinical trial of self-gripping mesh versus sutured mesh for Lichtenstein hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2013;100(4): 474-81

Baylon K, Camarillo PR, Zuniga AE, Diazelizondo JA, Gilkerson R, Lozano K. Past, present and future of surgical meshes:a review. Membranes. 2017;7(47): 1-23.

Post S, Weiss B, Willer M, Neufang T, Lorenz D. Randomized clinical trial of lightweight composite mesh for Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2004;91:44-8.

Burcharth J, Pedersen M, Bisgarrd T, Pedersen C, Rosenberg J. Nationwide prevalence of groin hernia repair. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):1-6.

Kark AE, Kurzer M. Groin hernias in women. Hernia. 2008;12(3):267-70.

O’Dwyer PJ, Kingsnorth AN, Molloy RG, Small PK, Lammers B, Horeyseck G. Randomized clinical trial assessing impact of a lightweight or heavyweight mesh on chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2005;92:166-70.

Heikkinen T, Wollert S, Osterberg J, Smedberg S, Bringman S. Early results of a randomised trial comparing Prolene and VyproII-mesh in endoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TEP) of recurrent unilateral hernias. Hernia. 2006;10:34-40.

Khan N, Bangash A, Sadiq M, Hadi AU, Hamid H. Polyglactine/Polypropylene Mesh vs. Propylene Mesh: Is There a Need for Newer Prosthesis in Inguinal Hernia? Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2010;16(1):8-13.

Smietanski M. Randomized clinical trial comparing a polypropylene with a poliglecaprone and polypropylene composite mesh for inguinal hernioplasty. Brit J Surg. 2008;95:1462-8.

Mukthinath G, Shankar K, Bhaskaran A. A comparative study of postoperative complications of lightweight mesh and conventional prolene mesh in Lichtenstein hernia repair. Int J Res Med Sci. 2016; 4(6):2130-4.