Prospective study of propellar flaps vs. traditional local flaps in lower limb trauma reconstruction


  • Praveen Kumar C. V. Reddy Department of Plastic Surgery, Sri Venkateshwara Institute of Medical Sciences, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • Naga Teja Mucherla Department of Plastic Surgery, Sri Venkateshwara Institute of Medical Sciences, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India



Perforator flap, Propeller flap, Limb trauma reconstruction


Background: Adequate coverage of traumatic complex lower extremity wounds is often challenging for reconstructive surgeons. Propeller perforator flaps have gained wide acceptance as an alternative in soft tissue coverage of complex lower extremity defects over the last decade. We report our experience with distal lower extremity reconstructions performed either with traditional local flaps vs. propeller perforator flaps. our aim here was to compare non-microvascular flaps with traditional local flaps for coverage of traumatic lower extremity wounds.

Methods: 30 patients operated for lower extremity defects and reconstructed either with traditional local flaps or propeller perforator flaps between November 2016 to December 2020 were included in the study.

Results: There were 22 male and 8 female patients. Mean age was 43.00±14.85 (range: 24 to 66 years) in the local flap group and mean age was 42.11±12.05 (range: 23 to 65 years) in the propeller perforator flap group. Hospital stays and overall operation time was significantly higher in the propeller flap group. There was no statistically significant difference in complication rates between either group.

Conclusions: Concerning many advantages, like decreased operative time, avoiding micro anastomosis, reconstruction with like tissues, we suggest that propeller perforator flaps can be first-line reconstructive choice. These flaps can be used successfully by reconstructive surgeons in small clinics to prevent unnecessary tertiary medical center referrals as well as extended hospitalizations, long operation times, and increased costs. However, propeller flaps do hold more complications compared to local flaps and do require technical expertise.


Manohar N, Vathulya M, Mahakalkar S. A Novel Fasciocutaneous Flap Design for Reconstructions in Scarred Tissue: A Case Report. Cureus. 2021;13(7):e16402.

Lecours C, Saint-Cyr M, Wong C, Bernier C, Mailhot E, Tardif M, Chollet A. Freestyle pedicle perforator flaps: clinical results and vascular anatomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126(5):1589-603.

Mateev MA, Kuokkanen HO. Reconstruction of soft tissue defects in the extremities with a pedicled perforator flap: series of 25 patients. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2012;46(1):32-6.

Pignatti M, Ogawa R, Hallock GG, Mateev M, Georgescu AV, Balakrishnan G, et al. The “Tokyo” consensus on propeller flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:716-22.

Bekara F, Herlin C, Somda S, de Runz A, Grolleau JL, Chaput B. Free versus perforator-pedicled propeller flaps in lower extremity reconstruction: What is the safest coverage? A meta-analysis. Microsurg. 2016.

Acartürk TO, Tunc S, Acar F. Versatility of the perforator-based adipose, adipofascial, and fasciocutaneous flaps in reconstruction of distal leg and foot defects. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2016; 55:362-7.

Vaienti L, Calori GM, Leone F, Brioschi M, Parodi PC, Marchesi A. Posterior tibial artery perforator flaps for coverage of Achilles region defects. Injury. 2014;45:S133-7.

Hyakusoku H, Yamamoto T, Fumiiri M. The propeller flap method. Br J Plast Surg. 1991;44:53-54.

Pignatti M, Ogawa R, Hallock GG. The “Tokyo” consensus on propeller flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:716-22.

Gir P, Cheng A, Oni G, Mojallal A, Saint-Cyr M. Pedicled perforator (propeller) flaps in lower extremity defects: A systematic review. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2012;28:595-601.

Hallock GG. Direct and indirect perforator flaps: the history and the controversy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111:855-65.

Bekara F, Herlin C, Mojallal A, Sinna R, Ayestaray B, Letois F, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of perforator-pedicled propeller flaps in lower extremity defects: identification of risk factors for complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137:314-31.

D’Arpa S, Toia F, Pirrello R, Moschella F, Cordova A. Propeller flaps: a review of indications, technique, and results. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:986829.

Bravo FG, Schwarze HP. Free-style local perforator flaps: Concept and classification system. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009;62:602-8.

Bilgin SS, Topalan M, Ip WY, Chow SP. Effect of torsion on microvenous anastomotic patency in a rat model and early thrombolytic phenomenon. Microsurgery. 2003;23:381-6.

Panagiotopoulos K, Soucacos PN, Korres DS. Anatomical study and colour Doppler assessment of the skin perforators of the anterior tibial artery and possible clinical applications. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009;62:1524-9.

Khan UD, Miller JG. Reliability of handheld Doppler in planning local perforator-based flaps for extremities. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2007;31:521-5.






Original Research Articles