DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20215133
Published: 2021-12-28

Functional outcome assessment for surgical decompression of cervical spondylotic myelopathy

Tinu Ravi Abraham, Ajax John, P. K. Balakrishnan, Tom Jose

Abstract


Background: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is one of the most common dysfunctions of spinal cord occurs due to degenerative changes in cervical spine disc and facet joints. It is a form of progressive spine disease including herniated disc and spinal cord stenosis which manifests as changes in gait, skilled hand movements, muscle strength, bladder dysfunction etc. Recent studies and trials have established that surgical decompression of cervical spinal is a cost-effective treatment modality which provide satisfactory functional recovery. This study aimed at the functional outcome of surgical decompression of CSM.

Methods: The prospective study of 100 cases of cervical myelopathy for which decompressive surgery was done from August 2020 to August 2021. Results were analysed according to Nuricks and modified Japanese orthopedic association scoring system (MJOA).

Results: Seventy one males and 29 females were included in this study with average age was 53 and average hospital stay was 3.55 days. Average pre-op Nurick score was 1.93, while score after 6 months and 1year were 1.44 and 1.15respectively. Average pre-op MJOA score was 13.63, while score after 6 months and 1 year were 14.58 and 15.74 respectively.

Conclusions: The functional results of decompressive surgeries for cervical myelopathy are satisfactory. Both anterior and posterior approaches are recommended for multiple cervical myelopathy with comparable outcomes. DM and age was observed as the independent predictor for functional outcome, while, gender and level of disease got less significant predictive value.


Keywords


Cervical spondylotic myelopathy, Decompression surgeries, ACDF, Corpectomy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Binder AI. Cervical spondylosis and neck pain. BMJ. 2007;334(7592):527-31.

Vernon H. The Neck disability index: state-of-the-art, 1991-2008. J Manipulat Physiol Ther. 2008;31(7):491-502.

Sharma A, Kishore H, Singh V, Shawky Abdelgawaad A, Sinha S, Kamble PC, et al. Comparative study of functional outcome of anterior cervical decompression and interbody fusion with tricortical stand-alone iliac crest autograft versus stand-alone polyetheretherketone cage in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Glob Spine J. 2018;8(8):860-5.

Singrakhia MD, Malewar NR, Deshmukh S, Deshmukh SS. Prospective analysis of functional outcome of single-stage surgical treatment for symptomatic tandem spinal stenosis. Indian J Orthop. 2019;53(2):315-23.

Leak AM, Cooper J, Dyer S, Williams KA, Turner-Stokes L, Frank AO. The Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire, devised to measure neck pain and disability. Br J Rheumatol. 1994;33(5):469-74.

Zhang RJ, Shen CL, Zhang JX, Zhang XJ, Dong FL, Tao H, et al. Clinical features and surgical outcomes of cervical spondylotic myelopathy in patients of different ages: a retrospective study. Spinal Cord. 2018;56(1):7-13.

Clarke E, Robinson Pk. Cervical myelopathy: a complication of cervical spondylosis. Brain. 1956;79(3):483-510.

Ebersold MJ, Pare MC, Quast LM. Surgical treatment for cervical spondylitic myelopathy. J Neurosurg. 1995;82(5):745-51.

Hirai O, Kondo A, Aoyama I, Nin K. Anterior decompression surgery of aged patients with cervical myelopathy. No shinkei geka. Neurol Surg. 1991;19(11):1017-23.

Morio Y, Teshima R, Nagashima H, Nawata K, Yamasaki D, Nanjo Y. Correlation between operative outcomes of cervical compression myelopathy and MRI of the spinal cord. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26(11):1238-45.

Cusick JF. Pathophysiology and treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Clin Neurosurg. 1991;37:661-81.

Wiberg J. Effects of surgery on cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1986;81(3-4):113-7.

Nagashima H, Morio Y, Yamashita H, Yamane K, Teshima R. Clinical features and surgical outcomes of cervical myelopathy in the elderly. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;444:140-5.

Furlan JC, Kalsi-Ryan S, Kailaya-Vasan A, Massicotte EM, Fehlings MG. Functional and clinical outcomes following surgical treatment in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective study of 81 cases. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;14(3):348-55.

Ogawa Y, Toyama Y, Chiba K, Matsumoto M, Nakamura M, Takaishi H, et al. Long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine. J Neurosurg Spine. 2004;1(2):168-74.

Koyanagi T, Hirabayashi K, Satomi K, Toyama Y, Fujimura Y. Predictability of operative results of cervical compression myelopathy based on preoperative computed tomographic myelography. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993;18(14):1958-63.

Masaki Y, Yamazaki M, Okawa A, Aramomi M, Hashimoto M, Koda M, et al. An analysis of factors causing poor surgical outcome in patients with cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: anterior decompression with spinal fusion versus laminoplasty. J Spin Disord Tech. 2007;20(1):7-13.