DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20214737

The efficacy of primary closure following incision and drainage of lactational breast abscess over traditional open method

Ruksana Parvin, Ahmed Sharif, Mosammat Bilkis Parvin, Kazi Sohel Iqbal, Golshan Ara Kohinoor, Riddita Mustica, M. Sourav Hossain

Abstract


Background: The incidence of breast abscess ranges from 0.4 to 11% of all lactating mothers. Although breast abscess is a serious common complication of mastitis with high morbidity rate, there is a lack of high-quality randomized trial to demonstrate the best treatments.

Methods: The Study was conducted in the Department of Surgery of Universal medical college and hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh and MH Samorita hospital and medical college. It was a randomized controlled trial to see the efficacy of primary closure following incision and drainage of lactational breast abscess over traditional open method. Total 120 population were randomly selected in group A (60 patients) and group B (60 patients) and data was collected with their signed ethical consent. The study was conducted from January 2014 to December 2019. Collected data were classified, edited, coded and entered into the computer for statistical analysis by using Statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) version 22.

Results: In patients of group A, most breast abscesses healed successfully with a nicer circumareolar scar, earlier healing, lesser number of hospital visits and lower total cost as compared to patients in group B. There was early resumption of breastfeeding and better patient satisfaction seen in group A.

Conclusions: Primary closure of lactational breast abscess following incision and drainage is an effective modality of treatment of lactational breast abscess and it should be the first line of treatment, especially for larger and multilocular breast abscesses while traditional incision and drainage should be reserved for abscesses with gangrenous skin changes, where primary closure is not justified.


Keywords


Breast abscess, Incision and drainage, Lactation, Primary closure

Full Text:

PDF

References


Dener C, Inan A. Breast abscesses in lactating women. World J Surg. 2003;27(2):130-33.

Bharat A, Gao F, Aft RL. Predictors of primary breast abscesses and Recurrence. World J Surg. 2009;33(12):2582-6.

Berens PD. Prenatal, intrapartum, and postpartum support of the lactating mother. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2001;48(2):365-75.

Kvist LJ, Rydhstroem H. Factors related to breast abscess after delivery: a population-based study. BJOG. 2005;112(8):1070-4.

Rizzo M, Peng L, Frisch A. Breast abscesses in nonlactating women with diabetes: clinical features and outcome. Am J Med Sci. 2009;338(2):123-6.

Benson EA, Goodman MA. Incision with primary suture in the treatment of acute puerperal breast abscess. Br J Surg. 1970;57(1):55-8.

Dalvi S, Gurav P, Maurya A, Kumar S. Analytical study of drainage of breast abscess by open drainage with primary suary suturing with negative suction drain and conventional incision and drainage. Med PulseInternational Medical Journal. 2017;4(2):210-2.

Karvande R, Ahire M, Bhole M, Rathod C. Comparison between aspiration and incision and drainage of breast abscess. Int Surg J. 2016;3(4):1773-80.

Odiya S, Mathur R, Arora S. Comparative study of conventional incision and drainage versus percutaneous placement of suction drain: changing trend of breast abscess management. Int surg J. 2016;3(3):1580-4.

Sheikh B, Shah AA, Sohu KM, Solangi RA. Needle aspiration in the treatment of breast abscess. Rawal Med J. 2014;39:58-60.

Javed MU, Aleem S, Asif SJ, Iqbal J. Breast abscess; comparison of recurrence rate between incision drainage and multiple needle aspiration. Professional Med J. 2017;24(1):89-94.

Mwenda AS, Wasike R. Breast Abscess Management and the Role of Post Incisional Antibiotics. Ann Afr Surg. 2016;13(2):63-6.

Raj MRM, Aareb A. Acute Abscess Management – Comparative Study between Primary Closures versus Healing by Secondary Intention. Int J Sci Stud. 2016;4(2):260-2.

Abraham N, Doudle M, Carison P. Open versus closed surgical treatment of abscesses: A controlled clinical trail.Aust NZJ Surg 1997;67:173-6 20. Dubey V,Choudhary SK. Incision and drainage versus incision and drainage with primary closure and use of c l o s e d s u c ti o n d r a i n i n a c u t e a b s c e ss e s wounds. 2013;25:58-60.

Kale A, Athavale V. A comparative study of conventional incision and drainage versus incision and drainage with primary closure of wound in acute abscesses. Med J DY Patil univ. 2014;7:744-7.

Trop I, Dugas A, David J, et al. Breast Abscesses: Evidence Based Algorithms for Diagnosis, Management and Follow-Up. Radiographics. 2011; 31: 1683-99 23. Irusen H, Rohwer AC, Steyn DW, et al. Treatments for Breast Abscesses in Breastfeeding Women. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev. 2015;(8):CD010490.

Ulitzsch D, Nyman MK, Carlson RA. Breast abscesses in lactating women: US-guided treatment. Radiology. 2004;232:904-9.

Roberts KL. A comparison of chilled cabbage leaves and chilled gelpaks in reducing breast engorgement. J Hum Lact. 1995;11(1):17-20.

Fu SM, Wang XM, Yin CY. Effectiveness of hemostasis with Foley catheter after vacuum‐assisted breast biopsy. J Thorac Dis. 2015;7(7):1213‐20.

Larson KE, Valente SA. Milk fistula: diagnosis, prevention, and treatment. Breast J. 2016;22(1):111‐2.