Role of regional anaesthesia for modified radical mastectomy in a hospital in Central India: a retrospective observational study

Authors

  • Sumit Kumar Gupta Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Command Hospital, Lucknow, India
  • Arpit Garg Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Command Hospital, Lucknow, India
  • Sirisha Anne Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Command Hospital, Lucknow, India
  • Ajit Bhardwaj Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Command Hospital, Lucknow, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20212283

Keywords:

Modified radical mastectomy, Erector spinae block, Thoracic paravertebral block

Abstract

Background: The number of breast cancer surgeries in India are increasing in the recent years. Lifestyle changes and increased awareness are the two important factors contributing to the same. Newer methods of anaesthetic management are also being practised for overall benefit of the patient. Recent advances in the regional anaesthesia techniques especially under the guidance of ultrasonography, dramatically changed not only the operative outcomes but also the post-operative stay in the hospital. The present study was aimed to bring out differences between two popular options of opioid sparing regional anaesthesia techniques for post-operative analgesia for patients who had undergone modified radical mastectomy (MRM) for carcinoma breast at our centre.

Methods: A total of 88 patients of ASA II and III grading were enrolled in the study who had received either of erector spinae plane block (ESB) or thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB). Post-op numerical rating scale for pain and analgesic requirements were compared between the two groups. Hemodynamic parameters were recorded for comparing the influence of the blocks on hemodynamics.

Results: The demographic profile was similar between the 2 groups. The study showed that TPVB have a higher efficacy of analgesia when compared with that of ESB. However, there is no significant differences in the intra-op and post-op hemodynamics.

Conclusions: In view of a higher safety profile of ESB, administration of the same may still be preferred over the TPVB especially in those with less experienced hands in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy.

Author Biographies

Sumit Kumar Gupta, Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Command Hospital, Lucknow, India

Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care

Arpit Garg, Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Command Hospital, Lucknow, India

Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care

Sirisha Anne, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Command Hospital, Lucknow, India

Assosciate professor

Ajit Bhardwaj, Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Command Hospital, Lucknow, India

Associate professor

Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care 

References

Avreux P, Bertant A. Epidemiology of breast cancer. Rev Prat. 2013;63(10):1362-6.

Dubey AK, Gupta U, Jain S. Breast cancer statistic band prediction methodology: a systemic review and analysis. Asia J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(10):4237-45.

Veiga M, Costa D, Brazao I. Erector spinae block for radical mastectomy: a new indication? Rev Esp Anaestesiol Reanim. 2018;65(2):112-5.

FitzGerald S, Odor PM, Barron A, Pawa A. Breast surgery and regional anaesthesia. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2019;33(1):95-110.

Adhikary SD, Bernard S, Lopez H, Chin KJ. Erector spinae block versus retrolaminar block: a magnetic resonance imaging and anatomical study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018;43(7):756-62.

Richardson J, Lonnqvist PA. Thoracic paravertebral blocks. Brit J Anesthes. 1998;81(2):230-8.

Swisher MW, Wallace AM, Sztain JF, Said ET, Khabibi B, Abanoni M, et al. Erector spinae plane versus paravertebral nerve blocks for post-operative analgesia after breast surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Reg Anaesth Pain Med. 2020;45(4):260-6.

Vidal E, Gimmenez H, Forero M, Fojardo M. Erector spinae plane block: a cadaver study to determine its mechanism of action. Rev Esp Anaestestesiol Reanim. 2018;65(9):514-9.

Lopez MB, Cadorniga AG, Gonzalez JM, Suarez ED, Carbello CL, Sobirino FP. Erector spinae block. a narrative review. Cent Eur Jclin Res. 2018;1(1):28-9.

Fallatah S, Mousa WF. Multiple levels paravertebral block versus morphine patient-controlled analgesia following breast cancer surgery with unilateral lumpectomy and axillary lymph nodes dissection. Saudi J Anaesth. 2016;10(1):13-7.

Ercole F, Arora H, Kumar PA. Paravertebral block for thoracic surgery. J Cardiothoracic Vasc Anesth. 2018;32(2):915-27.

Ghamry MRE, Amer AF. Role of erector spinae plane block versus paravertebral block in pain control after modified radical mastectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Indian J Anaesth 2019;63(12):1008-14.

Singh S, Choudhary NK. Erector Spinae Block an effective block for post-operative analgesia in modified radical mastectomy. Indian J Anaesth. 2018;62(2):148-50.

Bhuvneswari V, Wig J, Mathews PJ, Singh G. Post-operative pain and analgesia requirements after para vertebral blocks for mastectomy. A randomized trial of different concentrations of Bupivacaine and Fentanyl. Indian J of Anaesth. 2012;56(1):34-9.

Fung B, Wary Z, Huang X. Ultrasound preoperative single dose erector spinae plane block provides comparable analgesia to thoracic para vertebral block following thoracotomy: a single centre randomized controlled double-blind study. Ann Transi Med. 2019;7(8):174.

Downloads

Published

2021-05-28

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles