Analysis of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy in renal calcular disease among children: a tertiary care experience


  • Suhail M. Khan Department of Urology, GMC, Jammu And Kashmir, India
  • Azhar A. Khan Department of Urology, Indraprastha Apollo, New Delhi, India
  • Anzeen N. Kanth Department of Paediatrics, SKIMS Soura, Jammu And Kashmir, India
  • Aymen M. Khan Department of Neuro-Anaesthesia SKIMS Soura, Jammu And Kashmir, India
  • Irtifa N. Kanth Department of General Medicine, GMC Srinagar, Jammu And Kashmir, India



Paediatric, Urology, Stones, ESWL, Urolithiasis, Shock wave, Lithotripsy


Background: The aim of this study is to review 10 years of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) experience in paediatric urolithiasis patients.

Methods: Data from a cohort of paediatric urolithiasis patients who underwent shock wave lithotripsy between 2012 and 2019 at department of urology, Indraprastha Apollo, New Delhi were used in a single-centre, retrospective comparative study. During a seven-year period, 250 paediatric patients (Male/female: 134/116, mean age: 10.22 years, range: 1-18) had 284 shock wave sessions in our hospital, with 208 having primary and 42 having recurrent urolithiasis. A total of 328 stones were discovered, with 192 (58.5%) in boys and 136 (41.5%) in girls. For ample stone fragmentation, one session of 200 to 3000 shockwave impulses was required, though some patients required more than 8000 impulses over 4 sessions. However, in most patients, low-energy shockwaves with a frequency of 1-2 were used to fragment the stones.

Results: Younger age was associated with quicker stone clearance in our study, which was likely due to shorter urinary tracts and a smaller "barrier" between the device and the stone. Furthermore, children who had renal colic prior to lithotripsy had a considerably lower chance of removing stones within two days than those who did not. This can be explained by the colic's underlying mechanism, which evolves against the backdrop of ureteric wall spasm. Mild macrohematuria and "steinstrasse" were identified in almost all patients during the first post-lithotripsy days, as predicted during the post-op course. There were no major obstructive, infectious, or other severe complications.

Conclusions: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy proved to be a safe and highly effective minimally invasive treatment of children with kidney stone disease.


Braun PM, Seif C, Jünemann KP, Alken P. Urolithiasis in children. Int. Braz. J. Urol. 2002;28:539-44.

Issler N, Dufek S, Kleta R, Bockenhauer D, Smeulders N, Van’t Hoff W. Epidemiology of pediatric renal stone disease: a 22-year single center experience in the UK. BMC Nephrol. 2017;18:136.

Sharma AP, Filler G. Epidemiology of pediatric urolithiasis. Indian J Urol. 2010;26:516-22.

Brikowski TH, Lotan Y, Pearle MS. Climate-related increase in the prevalence of urolithiasis in the United States. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:9841-6.

Chaussy C, Brendel W, Schmiedt E. Extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves. Lancet. 1980;2:1265-8.

Newman DM, Coury T, Lingeman JE, Mertz JH, Mosbaugh PG et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy experience in children. J Urol. 1986;136:238-40.

Sigman M, Laudone VP, Jenkins AD, Howards SS, Riehle R et al. Initial experience with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in children. J Urol. 1987;138:839-41.

Vandeursen H, Devos P, Baert L. Electromagnetic extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in children. J Urol. 1991;145:1229-31.

Rodrigues Netto N, Longo JA, Ikonomidis JA, Rodrigues Netto M. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in children. J Urol. 2002;167:2164-6.

D’Addessi A, Bongiovanni L, Sasso F, Gulino G, Falabella R, Bassi P. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in pediatrics. J Endourol. 2008;22:1-12.

Tekgül S, Dogan HS, Hoebeke P, Kocvara R, Nijman JM et al. EAU Guidelines on Paediatric Urology. European Society for Paediatric Urology. Eur Association Urol. 2016;136.

Gofrit ON, Pode D, Meretyk S, Katz G, Shapiro A et al. Is the pediatric ureter as efficient as the adult ureter in transporting fragments following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal calculi larger than 10 mm? J Urol. 2001;166:1862-4.

Zanetti G. Ureteral stones: SWL treatment. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2011;83:10-13.

Preminger GM, Tiselius HG, Assimos DG, Alken P, Buck C et al. 2007 guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. J Urol. 2007;178:2418-34.

Ozgür Tan M, Karaoğlan U, Sen I, Deniz N, Bozkirli I. The impact of radiological anatomy in clearance of lower calyceal stones after shock wave lithotripsy in pediatric patients. Eur Urol. 2003;43:188-93.

Lopatkin NA, Dzeranov NK. 15-year experience of SWL in treatment of KSD. Proceedings of the Russian Society Urol Board Plenum. 2003;5-25.

Trapeznikova MF, Dutov VV, Sobolevskiy AB. Possibilities of SWL application in the treatment of KSD in children. Proceedings of the Russian Society Urol Board Plenum. 2005;530-1.

Hofbauer J, Tuerk C, Höbarth K, Hasun R, Marberger M. ESWL in situ or ureteroscopy for ureteric stones? World J Urol. 1993;11:54-8.

Howles SA, Edwards MH, Cooper C, Thakker RV. Kidney stones: a fetal origins hypothesis. J Bone Miner Res. 2013;28:2535-9.

Shokeir AA. Renal colic: new concepts related to pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment. Curr Opin Urol. 2002;12:263-9.

Brinkmann OA, Griehl A, Kuwertz-Bröking E, Bulla M, Hertle L. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in children. Efficacy, complications and long-term follow-up. Eur Urol. 2001;39:591-7.

Tomescu P, Pănuş A, Mitroi G, Drăgoescu O, Stoica L, Dena S, Enache E. Assessment of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) therapeutic efficiency in urolithiasis. Curr Health Sci J. 2009;35:40-43.

Ceban E. The treatment of the reno-ureteral calculi by extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL). J Med Life. 2012;5:133-8.

Akin Y, Yucel S. Long-term effects of pediatric extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy on renal function. Res Rep Urol. 2014;6:21-5.

Neal DE, Harmon E, Hlavinka T. Effects of multiple sequential extracorporeal shock wave treatments on renal function: a primate model. J Endourol. 1991;5:217-21.

Villányi KK, Székely JG, Farkas LM, Jávor E, Pusztai C. Short-term changes in renal function after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in children. J Urol. 2001;166:222-4.

Lottmann HB, Archambaud F, Traxer O, Mercier-Pageyral B, Helal B. The efficacy and parenchymal consequences of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in infants. BJU Int. 2000;85:311-5.

Goel MC, Baserge NS, Babu RV, Sinha S, Kapoor R. Pediatric kidney: functional outcome after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol. 1996;155:2044-6.

Vlajkovic M, Slavkovic A, Radovanovic M, Siric Z, Stefanovic V, Perovic S. Long-term functional outcome of kidneys in children with urolithiasis after ESWL treatment. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2002;12:118-23.

Lingeman JE, Matlaga BR, Evan AP. Surgical management of upper urinary tract calculi. In Wein AJ, Kavoussi RL, Novick AC, Partin AW, Peters CA eds, Campbell-Walsh Urology, 9th edn. Philadelphia: Saunders, Elsevier. 2007;1431-507.






Original Research Articles