Trans-duodenal migration of pancreatic duct stent into liver

Authors

  • Girish D. Bakhshi Department of General Surgery, Grant Government Medical College and JJ Group of Hospitals, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • Samprathi D. Department of General Surgery, Grant Government Medical College and JJ Group of Hospitals, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6363-2035
  • Akshat Mishra Department of General Surgery, Grant Government Medical College and JJ Group of Hospitals, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • Mahesh Chanap Department of General Surgery, Grant Government Medical College and JJ Group of Hospitals, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20211848

Keywords:

Pancreas, Stent, Migration, Duodenum, Liver

Abstract

Endoscopic retrograde Cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP) is the one of the modalities for treating symptomatic pancreatic duct obstruction with dilation. A plastic stent placement is the standard technique followed. Complications after a plastic stent placement commonly found in the biliary tract in the form of migration into the duodenum with or without perforation have been widely described. Although complications of pancreatic duct stents are relatively rare, duodenal perforation secondary to pancreatic plastic stent migration into liver has not been described. Duodenal perforation results in perforative peritonitis when the intestinal contents leak into peritoneal cavity. However, stent migration resulting in duodenal perforation is a slow process where the inflammation results in adherence of surrounding organs, thereby preventing leak of intestinal contents into free peritoneal cavity. We present a case of contained duodenal perforation due to migration of pancreatic stent into liver. It is important to note that the chronic inflammatory process around the migrated pancreatic duct stent led to the asymptomatic nature patient in present case.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Testoni PA. Endoscopic pancreatic duct stent placement for inflammatory pancreatic diseases. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13(45):5971-8.

Chapman CG, Waxman I, Siddiqui UD. Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-Guided Pancreatic Duct Drainage: The Basics of When and How to Perform EUS-Guided Pancreatic Duct Interventions. Clin Endosc. 2016;49(2):161-7.

Cohen SA, Siegel JH, Kasmin FE. Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP. Abdom Imaging. 1996;21(5):385-94.

Alfieri S, Rosa F, Cina C, Tortorelli A, Tringali A, Perri V et al. Management of duodeno-pancreato-biliary perforations after ERCP: outcomes from an Italian tertiary referral center. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:2005-12.

Miller R, Zbar A, Klein Y, Buyeviz V, Melzer E, Mosenkis BN et al. Perforations following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a single institution experience and surgical recommendations. Am J Surg. 2013;206:180-6.

Stapfer MV, Selbi RR, Stein SC, Katkhouda N, Parekh D, Jabbour N et al. Management of duodenal perforation after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastroenterology. 1998;114:A1428.

Howard TJ, Tan T, Lehman GA, Sherman S, Madura JA, Fogel E et al. Classification and management of perforations complicating endoscopic sphincterotomy. Surgery (St Louis). 1999;126:658-65.

Kim BS, Kim IG, Ryu BY, Kim JH, Yoo KS, Baik GH et al. Management of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related perforations. J Korean Surg Soc. 2011;81:195-204.

Mari G, Costanzi A, Monzio N, Miranda A, Rossi M, Rigamonti L et al. Small bowel perforation caused by pancreaticojejunal anastomotic stent migration after pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary carcinoma. JOP. 2015;16:185-8.

Nishiwaki M, Mizuno C, Yano K, Oya H, Amano I, Matsumoto J et al. Retroperitoneal perforation caused by migration of a Pancreatic Spontaneous Dislodgement Stent into periampullary diverticula. Intern Med. 2018;57:351-5.

Downloads

Published

2021-04-28

How to Cite

Bakhshi, G. D., D., S., Mishra, A., & Chanap, M. (2021). Trans-duodenal migration of pancreatic duct stent into liver. International Surgery Journal, 8(5), 1640–1642. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20211848

Issue

Section

Case Reports