Can analysis of drain fluid biomarkers predict anastomotic leak?

Authors

  • Pradeep Jaju Department of Surgery, BLDE, Shri B. M. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research center, Vijayapur, Karnataka, India
  • Tejaswini Vallabha Department of Surgery, BLDE, Shri B. M. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research center, Vijayapur, Karnataka, India
  • Girish Kulloli Department of Surgery, BLDE, Shri B. M. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research center, Vijayapur, Karnataka, India
  • Vikram Sindagikar Department of Surgery, BLDE, Shri B. M. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research center, Vijayapur, Karnataka, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20211812

Keywords:

Anastomotic leak, Drain fluid, C-reactive protein, Procalcitonin

Abstract

Background: Anastomotic leak is a major complication often leading to significant morbidity and mortality. A method to predict leaks in the early postoperative period will help in better management and outcome. Though serum biomarkers like C-reactive protein and procalcitonin levels are often used to predict chances of developing complications, they are nonspecific and suggest mainly ongoing sepsis in general. Detection and assessment of the presence of these biomarkers at the local milieu is an alternate non-invasive option as they are produced at the injury site and increase in anastomotic leaks. If measured serially, can guide to a strong suspicion of a leak before the clinical signs are evident.   

Methods: Forty-eight patients who underwent intestinal anastomosis for various indications were included. Serial measurement of drain fluid C-reactive protein and procalcitonin were measured on postoperative days 3, 5 and 7.

Results: 7 patients developed leaks with two deaths. CRP and procalcitonin levels were higher on all days in comparison with the no leak group. CRP had the highest sensitivity on day 5 with 85.71% and 97.56% specificity on day7. The sensitivity and specificity of procalcitonin were 71.43% and 97.56% on day 5 and day 7. Accuracy was 93.7% for CRP and 87.5% for procalcitonin on the seventh day.

Conclusions: Serial analysis of drain fluid CRP and procalcitonin showed persistently increased levels in patients with an anastomotic leak. Correlation of the levels in patients with anastomotic leak suggests the possibility of their utility in the early detection of leaks.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Komen N, Bruin RW, Kleinrensink GJ, Jeekel J, Lange JF. Anastomotic leakage, the search for a reliable biomarker. A review of the literature. Colorectal Dis. 2008;10(2):109-15.

Uğraş B, Giriş M, Erbil Y, Gökpinar M, Citlak G, Işsever H, et al. Early prediction of anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery by measuring peritoneal cytokines: prospective study. Int J Surg. 2008;6(1):28-35.

Dinarello CA, Mier JW. Lymphokines. N Engl J Med. 1987;317(15):940-5.

Wiik H, Karttunen R, Haukipuro K, Syrjälä H. Maximal local and minimal systemic cytokine response to colorectal surgery: the influence of perioperative filgrastim. Cytokine. 2001;14(3):188-92.

Jansson K, Redler B, Truedsson L, Magnuson A, Matthiessen P, Andersson M, et al. Intraperitoneal cytokine response after major surgery: higher postoperative intraperitoneal versus systemic cytokine levels suggest the gastrointestinal tract as the major source of the postoperative inflammatory reaction. Am J Surg. 2004;187(3):372-7.

Herwig R, Glodny B, Kühle C, Schlüter B, Brinkmann OA, Strasser H, et al. Early identification of peritonitis by peritoneal cytokine measurement. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45(4):514-21.

Golub R, Golub RW, Cantu R, Stein HD. A multivariate analysis of factors contributing to leakage of intestinal anastomoses. J Am Coll Surg. 1997;184(4):364-72.

Detry RJ, Kartheuser A, Delriviere L, Saba J, Kestens PJ. Use of the circular stapler in 1000 consecutive colorectal anastomoses: experience of one surgical team. Surgery. 1995;117(2):140-5.

Mileski WJ, Joehl RJ, Rege RV, Nahrwold DL. Treatment of anastomotic leakage following low anterior colon resection. Arch Surg. 1988;123(8):968-71.

Hansen O, Schwenk W, Hucke HP, Stock W. Colorectal stapled anastomoses. Experiences and results. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39(1):30-6.

Jex RK, Heerden JA, Wolff BG, Ready RL, Ilstrup DM. Gastrointestinal anastomoses. Factors affecting early complications. Ann Surg. 1987;206(2):138-41.

Max E, Sweeney WB, Bailey HR, Oommen SC, Butts DR, Smith KW, et al. Results of 1,000 single-layer continuous polypropylene intestinal anastomoses. Am J Surg. 1991;162(5):461-7.

Nesbakken A, Nygaard K, Lunde OC. Outcome and late functional results after anastomotic leakage following mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2001;88(3):400-4.

Daams F, Luyer M, Lange JF. Colorectal anastomotic leakage: aspects of prevention, detection and treatment. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(15):2293-7.

Chow A, Tilney HS, Paraskeva P, Jeyarajah S, Zacharakis E, Purkayastha S. The morbidity surrounding reversal of defunctioning ileostomies: a systematic review of 48 studies including 6,107 cases. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009;24(6):711-23.

Karanjia ND, Corder AP, Bearn P, Heald RJ. Leakage from stapled low anastomosis after total mesorectal excision for carcinoma of the rectum. Br J Surg. 1994;81(8):1224-6.

Vignali A, Fazio VW, Lavery IC, Milsom JW, Church JM, Hull TL, et al. Factors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1,014 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 1997;185(2):105-13.

Marusch F, Koch A, Schmidt U, Geibetaler S, Dralle H, Saeger HD, et al. Value of a protective stoma in low anterior resections for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45(9):1164-71.

Alves A, Panis Y, Mathieu P, Mantion G, Kwiatkowski F, et al. Postoperative mortality and morbidity in French patients undergoing colorectal surgery: results of a prospective multicenter study. Arch Surg. 2005;140(3):278-83.

Komen N, Slieker J, Willemsen P, Mannaerts G, Pattyn P, Karsten T, et al. Acute phase proteins in drain fluid: a new screening tool for colorectal anastomotic leakage? The APPEAL study: analysis of parameters predictive for evident anastomotic leakage. Am J Surg. 2014;208(3):317-23.

Kostić Z, Slavković D, Mijusković Z, Panisić M, Ignjatović M. C-reactive protein in drainage fluid as a predictor of anastomotic leakage after elective colorectal resection. Vojnosanit Pregl. 2016;73(3):228-33.

Meisner M, Tschaikowsky K, Hutzler A, Schick C, Schüttler J. Postoperative plasma concentrations of procalcitonin after different types of surgery. Intensive Care Med. 1998;24(7):680-4.

Garcia GA, Frasson M, Flor LB, Blanco F, Puga R, Carratalá A, Garcia GE. Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein as early predictors of anastomotic leak in colorectal surgery: a prospective observational study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56(4):475-83.

Biondo S, Parés D, Kreisler E, Ragué JM, Fraccalvieri D, Ruiz AG, et al. Anastomotic dehiscence after resection and primary anastomosis in left-sided colonic emergencies. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48(12):2272-80.

Bucher P, Gervaz P, Soravia C, Mermillod B, Erne M, Morel P. Randomized clinical trial of mechanical bowel preparation versus no preparation before elective left-sided colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 2005;92(4):409-14.

Ram E, Sherman Y, Weil R, Vishne T, Kravarusic D, Dreznik Z. Is mechanical bowel preparation mandatory for elective colon surgery? A prospective randomized study. Arch Surg. 2005;140(3):285-8.

Downloads

Published

2021-04-28

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles