Morphological study of cervical spinal body and vertebral body anatomy: CT scan based

Authors

  • A. K. Chaurasiya Department of General Surgery, Gandhi Medical College and Associated Hamidia Hospital, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
  • Anil Dawar Department of General Surgery, Gandhi Medical College and Associated Hamidia Hospital, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
  • Rajneesh Gour Department of General Surgery, Gandhi Medical College and Associated Hamidia Hospital, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
  • Kunal Vaidya Department of General Surgery, Gandhi Medical College and Associated Hamidia Hospital, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20211824

Keywords:

Cervical spine, CT scan, Morphometery

Abstract

Background: The morphometery of the cervical spine vertebra is of clinical importance in traumatic, degenerative and inflammatory condition requiring surgery and instrumentation. The aim of this study was to determine the mid-sagittal, AP Transverse diameter, AP diameter of cervical vertebral body, surface area of canal and torg ratio at level C2 –C7.

Methods: Study was performed in the department of general surgery, GMC and Hamidia Hospital Bhopal from January 2016 - June 2020 in 300 patients with clinically apparent cervical spondylosis and cervical spine injury belongs to central India of age group 20- 88 years including males and females by gathering their parameters (height and weight) and CT of cervical region from C1 to D1 spine.

Results: In our study maximum sagittal canal diameter in males was found at C2 vertebral level (14.14 mm) and minimum at C4 vertebral level (14.00 mm) whereas the maximum sagittal canal diameter in females was found at C2 and C7 vertebral level (14.00 mm) and minimum at C4 vertebral level (13.82 mm) while mean sagittal canal diameter was greater in males than females. The maximum transverse canal diameter in both males and female was found at C7 level, it measures 21.09 mm in males and 21.38 mm in females.

Conclusions: The CT scan can provide accurate cervical canal measurement that could serve as useful guide in preoperative surgical planning, instrumentation and size of prosthesis.

 

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Hukuda S, Kojima Y. Sex discrepancy in the canal/body ratio of the cervical spine implicating the prevalence of cervical myelopathy in men. Spine. 2002;27(3):250-3.

Pavlov H, Torg JS, Robie B, Jahre C. Cervical spinal stenosis: determination with vertebral body ratio method. Radiology. 1987;164(3):771-5.

Song KJ, Choi BW, Kim SJ, Kim GH, Kim YS, Song JH. The relationship between spinal stenosis and neurological outcome in traumatic cervical spine injury: an analysis using Pavlov's ratio, spinal cord area, and spinal canal area. Clin Orthop Surg. 2009;1(1):11-8.

Ladd AL, Scranton PE. Congenital cervical stenosis presenting as transient quadriplegia in athletes. Report of two cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986;68(9):1371-4.

Yue WM, Tan SB, Tan MH, Koh DC, Tan CT. The Torg--Pavlov ratio in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a comparative study between patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy and a nonspondylotic, nonmyelopathic population. Spine. 2001;26(16):1760-4.

Song KJ, Choi BW, Kim SJ, Kim GH, Kim YS, Song JH. The relationship between spinal stenosis and neurological outcome in traumatic cervical spine injury: an analysis using Pavlov's ratio, spinal cord area, and spinal canal area. Clin Orthop Surg. 2009;1(1):11-8.

Evangelopoulos D, Kontovazenitis P, Kouris S, Zlatidou X, Benneker L, Vlamis J, et al. Computerized tomographic morphometric analysis of the cervical spine. Open Orthop J. 2012;6:250-4.

Herzog RJ, Wiens JJ, Dillingham MF, Sontag MJ. Plain film radiography, multiplanar computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. Spine. 1991;16(6):178-86.

Sasaki T, Kadoya S, Iizuka H. Roentgenological study of the sagittal diameter of the cervical spinal canal in normal adult Japanese. Neurol Med Chir. 1998;38(2):83-8.

Ryan T, Maldjian C, Mattacola CG, Stephen SJ. Cervical spine stenosis measures in normal subjects. Physical therapy faculty publications. 2019;16.

Lim JK, Wong HK. Variation of the cervical spinal Torg ratio with gender and ethnicity. Spine J. 2004;4(4):396-401.

Gupta SK, Roy RC, Srivastava A. Sagittal diameter of the cervical canal in normal Indian adults. Clin Radiol. 1982;33(6):681-5.

Prasad SS, O'Malley M, Caplan M, Shackleford IM, Pydisetty RK. MRI measurements of the cervical spine and their correlation to Pavlov's ratio. Spine. 2003;28(12):1263-8.

Gour KK, Shrivastava SK, Thakare AE. Size of cervical vertebral canal measurements in lateral cervical radiographs and dried bones. Int J Biol Med Res. 2011;2(3):778-80.

Lee HM, Kim NH, Kim HJ, Chung IH. Mid-sagittal canal diameter and vertebral body/canal ratio of the cervical spine in Koreans. Yonsei Med J. 1994;35(4):446-52.

Castro FP. Stingers, cervical cord neuropraxia and stenosis. Clin Sports Med. 2003;22:483-92.

Hershman EB. Brachial plexus injuries. Clin Sports Med. 1990;9(2):311-29.

Dicle L. The variation of torg ratio with gender in patients with neck pain. Med J. 2007;34:154-8.

Kathole D. Normal cervical spine morphometry and cervical spinal stenosis in asymptomatic professional football players. Int J Recent Trends Sci Technol. 2012;3(2):54-8.

Downloads

Published

2021-04-28

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles