A prospective study of outcome and monitoring of patients with perforation peritonits by using APACHE 2 score

Authors

  • R. S. Gupta Department of Surgery, Gandhi Medical College, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
  • Santosh Roshan Department of Surgery, Gandhi Medical College, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
  • Vishnukant Pandey Department of Surgery, Gandhi Medical College, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
  • Surendra Shrivastava Department of Surgery, Gandhi Medical College, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20211819

Keywords:

Perforation peritonitis, Outcome, APACHE 2 score, Surgical emergency

Abstract

Background: Perforation peritonitis is very common surgical emergency and despite newer and advanced technology as a monitoring system APACHE 2 score have a good predictive power to predict outcome and monitoring in such patient

Methods: This is a prospective study by which APACHE 2 score was applied over the patient before the surgery and after the surgery at first post operative day and score was calculated in selected preformed and result was concluded

Results: The outcome of the Patients largely depends on age, perforation size, duration of presentation, and duration of hospitalization all these are well correlated with APCHE 2 score to predict outcome and monitoring.

Conclusions: The accuracy of APACHE 2 score to predict the outcome in perforation peritonitis increases when the result of score was combined which was applied two time prior to surgery and after the surgery.

References

Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985;13(10):818-29.

Knaus WA, Zimmerman JE, Wagner DP, Draper EA, Lawrence DE. APACHE-acute physiology and chronic health evaluation: a physiologically basedclassification system. Crit Care Med. 1981;9:591-7.

Kathleen M. Akgün, Terrence E. Murphy, Katy L. B. Araujo, Peter H. Van Ness, Margaret Pisani, "Does Gender Impact Intensity of Care Provided to Older Medical Intensive Care Unit Patients?". Critical Care Research and Practice. 2010;2010:404608.

Zou X, Li S, Fang M, Hu M, Bian Y, Lin J et al. Crit Care Med. 2020;48(8):e657-65.

Munghate A, Kumar A, Mittal S, Singh H, Sharma J, Yadav M. Acute Physiological and Chronic Health Evaluation II Score and its Correlation with Three Surgical Strategies for Management of Ileal Perforations. J Surg Tech Case Rep. 2015;7(2):32-6.

Oh TK, Hutchinson R, Short S. Verification APACHE scoring system in a Hong Kong intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 1993;21:698-705.

Wong, David T, Croft, Sally L. Evaluation of predictive ability of APACHE -2 system and hospital outcome in Canadian ICU patient. Crit Care Med. 1995;23(7);1177-83.

Rowan KM, Kerr JH. Patient selection for intensive care: A comparison of New Zealand and United States hospital. Crit Care Med. 1998;16:318-26.

Sirio CA, Tajimi K, Knaus WA. An initial comparison of intensive care in Japan and the United states. Crit Care Med. 1992;20:1207-15.

Downloads

Published

2021-04-28

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles