Computed tomography severity index and serum CRP concentration for predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis


  • Abdul Rashid Nagarchi Department of General Surgery, M.V.J. Medical College and Research Hospital, Hoskote, Karnataka, India
  • Manohar Babu Department of General Surgery, M.V.J. Medical College and Research Hospital, Hoskote, Karnataka, India
  • Syed Saad Department of General Surgery, M.V.J. Medical College and Research Hospital, Hoskote, Karnataka, India



Acute phase reaction, Inflammation, Pancreas


Background: The assessment of the severity of pancreatitis is important for management of this challenging disease. An accurate system which could predict the severity and identify the local extent and complications of a serious inflammation is beneficial for the patient outcome. The aim was to establish the value of the CTSI in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis and to compare it with the accuracy of the serum CRP concentrations.

Methods: Prospective clinical study based on analysis of 55 patients. Each patient underwent thorough clinical and biochemical analysis and CECT abdomen. CTSI within 5 days, serum CRP level 48 hours after admission.

Results: The mean values of predictive markers in the mild and the severe pancreatitis groups were: computed tomography severity index 1.26 and 6.30 (p<0.001) and CRP 96.0 mg/l and 192.4 mg/l (p<0.001), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy were calculated for the CTSI (greater than 3: 85%, 98%, 92%, 95%, and 95%) and for CRP (equal to, or greater than 150 mg/l: 85%, 74%, 50%, 94%, and 76%).

Conclusions: We found a close correlation with CRP levels and the CTSI of patients having severe pancreatitis and a CTSI score greater than 3 had a serum CRP level in excess of 150 mg/l. CRP is incapable of identifying local complications. The CTSI is a reliable method for staging the severity of acute pancreatitis and showing the local extent of the inflammation and the occurrence of local complications.


Author Biography

Abdul Rashid Nagarchi, Department of General Surgery, M.V.J. Medical College and Research Hospital, Hoskote, Karnataka, India

Department of General Surgery

Post Graduate


Werner J, Waldernar UHL, Buchler MW. Acute pancreatitis. In: Cameron JL, ed. Current Surgical Therapy, 8th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Mosby; 2004:459-464.

Eachempati SR, Hydo LJ, Barie PS. Severity scoring for prognostication in patients with severe acute pancreatitis. Arch Surg. 2002;137:730-6.

Osvaldt AB, Viero P, da Costa BMS, Wendt LR, Bersch VP, Rohde L. Evaluation of Ranson, Glasgow, APACHE-II, and APACHE-O criteria to predict severity in acute biliary pancreatitis. Int Surg. 2001;86:158-61.

Balthazar EJ. Staging of acute pancreatitis. Radiol Clin North Am. 2002;40:1199-209.

Balthazar EJ, Robinson DL, Megibow AJ, Ranson JH. Acute pancreatitis: value of CT in establishing prognosis. Radiology. 1990;174:331-6.

Larvin M, McMahon MJ. APACHE-II score for assessment and monitoring of acute pancreatitis. Lancet. 1989;2:201-5.

Viedma JA, Perez-Mateo M, Dominguez JE, Carballo F. Role of interleukin-6 in acute pancreatitis. Comparison with C-reactive protein and phospholipase A. Gut. 1992;33:1264-7.

Triester SL, Kowdley KV. Prognostic factors in acute pancreatitis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2002;34:16776.

Bradley EL III. A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. Summary of the International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis, Attlanta, GA, Sept 11-13, 1992. Arch Surg. 1993;128:586-90.

Yousaf M, Mc Callion K, Diamond T. Management of severe acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg. 2003;90:407-20.

Robert JH, Frossard JL, Mermillod B, Soravia C, Mensi N, Roth M, et al. Early prediction of acute pancreatitis: prospective study comparing computed tomography scans, Ranson, Glasgow, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II scores and various serum markers. World J Surg. 2002;26:612-9.

Simchuk EJ, Traveso LW, Nukui Y, Kozarek RA. Computed tomography severity index is a predictor of outcomes for severe pancreatitis. Am J Surg. 2000;179:352-5.

Yadav D, Agarwal N, Pitchumoni CS. A critical evaluation of laboratory tests in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:1309-18.

Neoptolemos JP, Kemppainen EA, Mayer JM, Fitzparrick JM, Raraty MG, Slavin J, et al. Early prediction of severity in acute pancreatitis by urinary trypsinogen activation peptides: a multicenter study. Lancet. 2000;355:1955-60.

Arvanitakis M, Delhaye M, De Maertelaere V, Bali M, Winant C, Coppens E, et al. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology. 2004;126:715-23.

Chatzicostas C, Roussomoustakaki M, Vardas E, Romanos J, Kouroumalis EA. Balthazar computed tomography severity index is superior to Ranson criteria and APACHE II and III scoring systems in predicting acute pancreatitis outcome. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2003;36:253-60.

Mortele KJ, Wiesner W, Intriere L, Shankar S, Zou KH, Kalantari BN, et al. A modified severity index for evaluating acute pancreatitis: improved correlation with patients’ outcome. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183:1261-5.






Original Research Articles