Laparoscopic adhesiolysis in treatment of post appendectomy pain in right iliac fossa- an evaluation


  • Bidyut Kumar Biswas Department of General Surgery, College of Medicine and JNM Hospital, Kalyani, Nadia, West Bengal, India
  • Rasbihari Hembram Department of General Surgery, College of Medicine and JNM Hospital, Kalyani, Nadia, West Bengal, India
  • Subikash Biswas Department of General Surgery, College of Medicine and JNM Hospital, Kalyani, Nadia, West Bengal, India



Adhesiolysis, Laparoscopy, Post appendectomy pain, Right iliac fossa pain


Background: Post-operative complications following appendectomy are relatively not uncommon and pain during this period is sometimes seen. Persistent or reappearance of similar pain causes the loss of patient’s confidence on the procedure itself as well as despair for surgeons.

Methods: The study was conducted at our institution to determine the cause of post appendectomy right iliac fossa pain and to evaluate the role of laparosopic adhesiolysis as a therapeutic tool. 35 patients with post appendectomy right iliac fossa pain were included in the study and outcome of post-operative peri-caecal adhesions (if found) treatment with laparoscopic adhesiolysis was assessed.

Results: 80% of the 35 patients were in the age group of 18-38 years. 37.14% (13 patients) were symptomatic within 1 year of appendectomy. Pain due to post-operative adhesion was found in 20% (7) of the patients. With laparoscopic adhesiolysis, the diagnostic accuracy rate was 78.57% and therapeutic relief in pain was 85.72% of the patients in our study.

Conclusions: Patients presenting recurrent pain in right iliac fossa, after appendectomy should not be overlooked. Patients with recurrent right iliac fossa pain following appendectomy may benefit from laparoscopy, both as a diagnostic tool and with the added advantage of treating the patients simultaneously in the form of laparoscopic adhesiolysis. Adhesiolysis has offered pain free life as long as our follow up is concerned.


Lewis FR, Holcroft JW, Boey J, Dunphy JE. Appendicitis: a critical review of diagnosis and treatment in 1,000 cases. Arch Surg. 1975;110(5):677-84.

Ellis H, Moran BJ, Thompson JN, Parker MC, Wilson MS, Menzies D, et al. Adhesion-related hospital readmissions after abdominal and pelvic surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 1999;353(9163):1476-80.

Rapkin AJ. Adhesion and pelvic pain: a retrospective study. Obstet Gynaecol. 1986;68:13-5.

Weibel MA, Majno G. Peritoneal adhesions and their relation to abdominal surgery: a postmortem study. Am J Surg. 1973;126(3):345-53.

Borgstein PS, Gordjn RJ, Ejsboals QA. Acute appendicitis a clear cut diagnosis in men, a guessing game in young women. A prospective study on role of laparoscopy. Surg Endosc. 1997;11:923-7.

Andersson RE, Hugander AP, Ghazi SH, Ravn H, Offenbartl SK, Nyström PO, et al. Why does the clinical diagnosis fail in suspected appendicitis? Eur J Surg. 2000;166(10):796-802.

Piper R, Kager L. Acute appendicitis: a clinical study of 1018 case of emergency appendectomy. Acta Chir Scand. 1982;148:51.

Archibong EA, Eskandar M, Sobarde AS Ajao OG. Right lower quadrant pain in female. Is it appendicitis or Gynaecological? Dis Surg. 2002;23(1):30-3.

Yu J, Fulcher AS, Turner MA, Halvorsen RA. Helical CT evaluation of acute right lower quadrant pain: part I, common mimics of appendicitis. Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184(4):1136-42.

Jess P, Bjerregaard B, Brynitz S, Holst-Christensen J, Kalaja E, Lund-Kristensen J. Acute appendicitis: prospective trial concerning diagnostic accuracy and complications. Am J Surg. 1981;141(2):232-4.

Greene JM, Peckler D, Schumer W, Greene EI. Incomplete surgical removal of the appendix; its complications. J Int Coll Surg. 1958;29(2 Pt 1):141-6.

Goode JV. Management of appendiceal stump. Ann Surg. 1943;13:956-63.

Mc Leanan I, Watt JK. Justification for appendectomy in chronic appendicitis. Br Med J. 1954;2:738.

Jain KA, Quam JP, Ablin DS, Gerscovich EO, Shelton DK. Imaging findings in patients with right lower quadrant pain: alternative diagnoses to appendicitis. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1997;21:693-8.

Garlock JH. Appendectomy wound repair and hernia. Ann Surg. 1929;89(2):282.

Gue S. Development of right inguinal hernia following appendectomy. Br Med J. 1972;59:352.

Gomez AL, Peter KS. Psychological mediated abdominal pain in surgical and medical out patients clinic. Br Med J. 1977;1:1451.

Greason KL, Rappold JF, Liberman MA. Incidental laparoscopic appendectomy for acute right lower quardrant abdominal pain. Its time has come. Surg Enndosc. 1998;12:223-5.

Samsi AB, Adrakar NV, Kamat RS. A study of 100 consecutive cases of acute appendicitis with their histological findings. Indian J Surg. 1969;3:574-9.

Whitworth CM, Whitworth PW, Sanfillipo J, Polk HC Jr. Value of diagnostic laparoscopy in young women with possible appendicitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1988;167(3):187-90.

Greenberg JJ, Esposito JJ. Appendicitis after appendicetomy: a warning. J laparoendosc Surg. 1996;6:185.

Carter JE. Laparoscopic treatment for chronic pelvic pain: results from three-year follow-up. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1994;1(4, Part 2):S6.

Hallfeldt KK, Kantelhardt T, Waldner H, Schweiberer L. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis in therapy of chronic abdominal pain. Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie. 1995;120(5):387-91.

Lehmann Willenbrock E, Mecke H, Riedel H. Sequelae of appendectomy with special reference to intra-abdominal adhesions, chronic abdominal pain. Gynaecol Obstet Invest. 1990;29(4):241-5.






Original Research Articles