Comparative study between outcome of noncemented and cemented total hip replacement

M. Tofayel Hossain; M. Asaduzzaman; M. Wahidur Rahman; Subir Hossain

doi:10.18203/2349-2902.isj20211818

Authors

M. Tofayel Hossain Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedic Rehabilitation, Dhaka, Bangladesh
M. Asaduzzaman Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedic Rehabilitation, Dhaka, Bangladesh
M. Wahidur Rahman Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedic Rehabilitation, Dhaka, Bangladesh
Subir Hossain Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedic Rehabilitation, Dhaka, Bangladesh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20211818

Keywords:

Cemented, Noncemented, Outcome, THR

Abstract

Background: To resolve the damage and pain in the joint in the hip, total hip replacement (THR) is used. There are some methods used to give THR, but cemented and noncemented THR are common to improve the result of the cemented THR as patients face some complications after replacement. In this study we compared the outcome of the noncemented and cemented THR. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of noncemented and cemented THR and find out the favorable outcome.

Methods: This was a randomized, comparative type of observational study and was conducted in the Department of Orthopedics of National Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedic Rehabilitation, Bangladesh during the period from 2019 to 2020 on 60 patients, of which 2 groups were made with 30 patients in each group. The age range was less than 50 to more than 70. In group-A cemented THR was done and in group-B noncemented THR was done. Percentage was calculated to find out the proportion of the findings. Further statistical analysis of the results was done by computer software devised in the statistical packages for social scientist (SPSS-23) and MS excel.

Results: After comparing outcomes, we saw that most of the patients get better result at the 2^nd revision conducted in 6^th months. There was no significant difference between the results of the two groups.

Conclusions: Though noncemented THR had better result in pain and infection occurrence after treatment, the instability is higher comparing cemented THR. Besides, patients cemented THR also had many complications after treatment.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Anon. 2019. Hip replacement-NHS-NHS. Available at: https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/hip-replacement/. Accessed 19 October 2020.

Coventry MB. The treatment of fracture-dislocation of the hip by total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974;56:1128-34.

Jasty M. Prosthetic loosening in total hip replacements. In: Bono JV, McCarthy JC, Thornhill TS, Bierbaum BE, Turner RH, eds. Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. Springer: New York; 1999:3-10.

Banaszkiewicz PA. Improved cementing techniques and femoral component loosening in young patients with hip arthroplasty: a 12-year radiographic review. In: Banaszkiewicz P, Kader D, eds. Classic Papers in Orthopaedics. Springer: London; 2013:31-4.

Morscher EW. Cementless total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;76-91.

Cheng SL, Davey JR, Inman RD, Binnington AG, Smith TJ. The effect of the medial collar in total hip arthroplasty with porous-coated components inserted without cement. An in vivo canine study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:118-23.

Wroblewski BM, Siney PD, Fleming PA. Charnley low-friction arthroplasty: survival patterns to 38 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:1015-8.

Ling RSM, Lee AJC, Gie GA, Timperley AJ, Hubble MJW, Howell JR, et al. The exeter hip: 40 years of Innovation in total hip arthroplasty. Exeter Hip Publishing; 2010.

Burston BJ, Barnett AJ, Amirfeyz R, Yates PJ, Bannister GC. Clinical and radiological results of the collarless polished tapered stem at 15 years follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94:889-94.

Gwynne-Jones DP, Garneti N, Wainwright C, Matheson JA, King R. The Morscher Press Fit acetabular component: a nine- to 13-year review. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:859-64.

Engh CA, Massin P. Cementless total hip arthroplasty using the anatomic medullary locking stem. Results using a survivorship analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;(249):141-58.

Ihle M, Mai S, Pfluger D, Siebert W. The results of the titanium-coated RM acetabular component at 20 years: a long-term follow-up of an uncemented primary total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:1284-90.

McAuley JP, Moore KD, Culpepper WJ, Engh CA. Total hip arthroplasty with porous-coated prostheses fixed without cement in patients who are sixty-five years of age or older. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:1648-55.

Hooper GJ, Rothwell AG, Stringer M, Frampton C. Revision following cemented and uncemented primary total hip replacement: a seven-year analysis from the New Zealand Joint Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:451-8.

Kim YH, Kim JS, Park JW, Joo JH. Comparison of total hip replacement with and without cement in patients younger than 50 years of age: the results at 18 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93:449-55.

Ulrich SD, Seyler TM, Bennett D, Delanois RE, Saleh KJ, Thongtrangan I, et al. Total hip arthroplasties: what are the reasons for revision? Int Orthop. 2008;32:597-604.

Clohisy JC, Harris WH. Primary hybrid total hip replacement, performed with insertion of the acetabular component without cement and a precoat femoral component with cement. An average ten-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:247-55.

Pennington M, Grieve R, Sekhon JS, Gregg P, Black N, van der Meulen JH. Cemented, cementless, and hybrid prostheses for total hip replacement: cost effectiveness analysis. BMJ. 2013;346:f1026.

Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G, Heller M, Graichen F, Rohlmann A, Strauss J, et al. Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J Biomech. 2001;34:859-71.

Charles MN, Bourne RB, Davey JR, Greenwald AS, Morrey BF, Rorabeck CH. Soft-tissue balancing of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg. 2004;86:1078-88.

Mäkelä KT, Matilainen M, Pulkkinen P, Fenstad AM, Havelin L, Engesaeter L, et al. Failure rate of cemented and uncemented total hip replacements: Register study of combined nordic database of four nations. BMJ. 2014;348:f7592.

Hailer NP, Garellick G, Kärrholm J. Uncemented and cemented primary total hip arthroplasty in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop. 2010;81:34-41.

Morshed S, Bozic KJ, Ries MD, Malchau H, Colford JM Jr. Comparison of cemented and uncemented fixation in total hip replacement: a meta-analysis. Acta Orthop. 2007;78:315-26.

Zimmerma S, Hawkes WG, Hudson JI, Magaziner J, Hebel JR, Towheed T, et al. Outcomes of surgical management of total HIP replacement in patients aged 65 years and older: Cemented versus cementless femoral components and lateral or anterolateral versus posterior anatomical approach. J Orthop Res. 2002;20:182-91.