DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20205364

Comparison of local versus spinal anaesthesia in inguinal hernia repair

Suraj Bhardwaj, Shuchi Sharma, Vatika Bhardwaj, Roshan Lal

Abstract


Background: Inguinal hernioplasty remain one of the most commonly performed operations worldwide.  Local anaesthesia can be a preferred method in day-case hernia surgeries. Present study was thus conducted to determine whether local anaesthetic technique is an acceptable alternative to spinal anaesthesia for hernia repair, especially with regards to operative conditions, postoperative pain relief and complications.

Methods: This was a prospective randomized single blinded clinical study consisting of sixty patients conducted after the ethical committee clearance. The patients posted for tension free lichtenstein elective hernioplasty were allocated to either of two groups, group A (n=30) were given local anaesthesia and patients in group B (n=30) were given spinal anaesthesia. The operative and postoperative pain sore using visual analogue scale, duration of surgery and any other complications were recorded.

Results: There was no demographic difference between the two groups. Time taken in local anesthesia was higher than spinal anesthesia. Intraoperative pain was higher in local anesthesia than spinal anesthesia. There was no difference in post-operative pain scores (p>0.05). Post-operative complications were more in spinal anesthesia group e.g. urinary retention, headache, etc.

Conclusions: Local anesthesia can be another good choice for inguinal hernia repair owing to its advantages and less complications, but it can’t be confirmed that local anaesthesia is better than spinal anaesthesia. It can be reliably concluded that local anaesthesia can be a preferred method in day-case hernia surgeries owing to its advantages of ease of administration and less complications.


Keywords


Day-case surgery, Hernioplasty, Inguinal hernia, Local anaesthesia, Pain, Spinal anaesthesia

Full Text:

PDF

References


Kehlet H, White PF. Optimizing anaesthesia for inguinal herniorrhaphy: General, Regional or local anaesthesia? Anesth Analg. 2001;93:1367-9.

Subramaniam P, Leslie J Gourlay C, Clezy JK. Inguinal hernia repair: A comparison between local and general anaesthesia. Aust NZJ Surg. 1998;68:799-800.

Callesen T, Bech K, Kehlet H. The feasibility, safety and cost of infiltration anaesthesia for hernia repair. Anaesthesia. 1998;53:31-5.

O’ Dwyer PJ, Serpell MG, Millar K, Paterson C, Young D, Hair A, Courtney CA, et al. Local or general anaesthesia for open hernia repair. A randomized trial. Annals Surg. 2003;237:574-9.

Ozgun H, Kurt MN, Kurt l, Cevikel MH. Comparison of local, spinal and general anaesthesia for inguinal herniorrhaphy, Eur J Surg. 2002;168:455-9.

Kark AE, Kurzer MN, Belsham PA. Three thousand one hundred seventy-five primary inguinal hernia repairs: advantages of ambulatory open mesh repair using local anesthesia. J Am Coll Surg. 1998;186:447–55.

Schwartz’s Principles of Surgery, 8th ed. Inguinal hernias; 2005:1358-1364.

Goel A, Bansal A, Singh A. Comparison of local versus spinal anesthesia in long standing open inguinal hernia repair. Int Surg J. 2017;11:3701-4.

Bhedi A, Damor S, Sarkar A. Inguinal hernia repair:Comparison of local anaesthesia and spinal anaesthesia. JMSCR. 2016;12:14540-7.

Van Veen RN, Mahabier C, Dawson I, Hop WC, Kok NF, Lange JF, Jeekel J. Spinal or local anesthesia in Lichtenstein hernia repair: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2008;247(3):428-33.

Russell RH: The saccular theory of hernia and the radical operation. Lancet. 1906;168(4340):1197-203.

Callesen T, Bech K, Kehlet H. One thousand consecutive inguinal hernia repairs under unmonitored local anaesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2001;93:1373-61.

Nordin P, Zetterström H, Gunnarsson U, Nilsson E. Local, regional, or general anaesthesia in groin hernia repair: multicentre randomised trial. Lancet. 2003;362(9387):853-8.

Song D, Greilich NB, White PF, Wateha MF, Tongier WK. Recovery profiles and costs of anaesthesia for outpatient unilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy. Anesth Analg. 2000;91:876-81.

Amid PK, Lichenstein IL. Long term results in current status of the Lichtenstein open tension-free hernioplasty. Hernia. 1998;2:89-94.

Young DV. Comparison of local, spinal and general anaesthesia for inguinal hernia repair. Am J Surg. 1987;153:560-3.

Rutkow IM, Robbins AW. Demographic classificatory and socio-economic aspects of hernia repair in the United States. Surg Clin N Am. 1993;73:413.

Arnbjornsson E. Development of right inguinal hernia after appendectomy. Am J Surg. 1982;143:174.

Gianetta E, Decian F, Cuneo S, Friedman D, Vitale B, Marinari G, et al. Hernia repair in elderly patients. Br J Surg. 1997;84:983-5.

Cattterall WA. Molecular mechanisms of gating and drug block of sodium channels" – Novartis Found Symp. 2002;241:206–32.

Rosenblatt MA, Abel M, Fischer GW, Itzkovich CJ, Eisenkraft JB. Successful Use of a 20% lipid emulsion to resuscitate a patient after a presumed bupivacaine-related cardiac arrest. Anesthesiol. 2006;105:217-9.

Picard J, Meek T. Lipid emulsion to treat overdose of local anaesthetic: the gift of the glob. Anaesthesia. 2006;61:107-9.

Nyhus LM, Condon RE. Hernia. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: JP Lippincott; 1989:154-177.

Abrahamson J. Maingot’s Abdominal Operations. 10th ed. Appleton and Lange; 1997:479-572.