Assessment of breast carcinoma by correlating BI-RADS scoring with mammographic density

Authors

  • Simranjit K. Dhadiala Department of General Surgery, Bharati Vidyapeeth University, Pune, Maharashtra, India
  • Shilpa Patankar Department of General Surgery, Bharati Vidyapeeth University, Pune, Maharashtra, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20204671

Keywords:

Breast cancer, Mammography, BI-RADS score, Percentage breast density

Abstract

Background: Breast density assessed by mammogram expressed in percentage of density of breast tissue reflects variations in breast tissue composition and is strongly associated with increased risk of breast cancer. The BI-RADS density method was created to indicate whether a mammogram represents a negative, benign or suspected malignant finding. To assess breast carcinoma by correlating breast imaging-reporting and data system (BI-RADS) scoring with mammographic density.

Methods: A total of 100 consecutive female patients with breast lump were assessed. The findings of the radiological examination and the histopathology results were subsequently analyzed to study the details of the breast disease in the group surveyed. BI-RADS classifications of breast density was extracted from mammography reports.

Results: Majority of patients were having BI-RADS score 4 (33%) followed by BI-RADS score 5 (30%). Majority of the patients were having percentage breast density 4 (35%) followed by Percentage breast density 3 (28%). BI-RADS score and percentage breast density had statistically significant correlation (p<0.05).

Conclusions: The BI-RADS score and percentage breast density by mammography had statistically significant correlation. Mammographic density is a strong breast cancer risk factor.

Author Biographies

Simranjit K. Dhadiala, Department of General Surgery, Bharati Vidyapeeth University, Pune, Maharashtra, India

Department of General Surgery

Senior resident

Shilpa Patankar, Department of General Surgery, Bharati Vidyapeeth University, Pune, Maharashtra, India

Department of General Surgery

Associate professor

References

Ghoncheh M, Pournamdar Z, Salehiniya H Incidence and Mortality and Epidemiology of Breast Cancer in the World. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016;17(S3):43-6.

McCormack VA, dos Santos Silva I. Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: A meta-analysis. Canc Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2006;15(6):1159-69.

Cummings SR, Tice JA, Bauer S, Browner WS, Cuzick J, Ziv E, et al. Prevention of breast cancer in postmenopausal women: approaches to estimating and reducing risk. J Nation Canc Inst. 2009;101(6):384-98.

Byrne C, Schairer C, Brinton LA, Wolfe J, Parekh N, Salane M, et al. Effects of mammographic density and benign breast disease on breast cancer risk (United States). Canc Caus Cont. 2001;12(2):103-10.

Eugênio DS, Souza JA, Chojniak R, Bitencourt AG, Graziano L, Marques EF. Breast cancer diagnosed before the 40 years: imaging findings and correlation with histology and molecular subtype. Appl Canc Res. 2017;37(1):16.

van der Waal D, den Heeten GJ, Pijnappel RM, Schuur KH, Timmers JM, Verbeek AL, et al. Comparing visually assessed BI-RADS breast density and automated volumetric breast density software: a cross-sectional study in a breast cancer screening setting. PLo On. 2015;10(9):e0136667.

Eng A, Gallant Z, Shepherd J, McCormack V, Li J, Dowsett M, et al. Digital mammographic density and breast cancer risk: A case–control study of six alternative density assessment methods. Brea Canc Res. 2014;16:439.

Bertrand KA, Tamimi RM, Scott CG, Jensen MR, Pankratz VS, Visscher D, et al. Mammographic density and risk of breast cancer by age and tumor characteristics. Brea Canc Res. 2013;15:R104.

Downloads

Published

2020-10-23

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles