Spectrum of computed tomography findings in gall bladder carcinoma patients: a retrospective observational study from tertiary care oncology setup
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20202809Keywords:
Carcinoma, Gall-bladder, MalignancyAbstract
Background: Gallbladder carcinoma (CA) is the most common primary biliary carcinoma and fifth most common malignancy of the gastrointestinal tract. Patients are usually asymptomatic early in the course of the disease and as a result, therapeutic window is usually missed. Authors discuss spectrum of imaging findings in CA gall bladder with multidetector computed tomography (CT) as modality of choice.
Methods: Retrospective cross-sectional study conducted at Shaukat Khanum memorial hospital and research centre. Data from January 2019 to January 2020 which included 70 patients was collected from HIS. Patients with imaging findings of CA gall bladder were examined who had undergone contrast enhanced CT. Institutional review board approved this study.
Results: Out of 70 cases in this study, cholelithiasis was present in 60%. The commonest MDCT finding was mass replacing GB (78.6%), followed by eccentric/diffuse gall bladder wall thickening. Extension to porta hepatis was noted in 25 (35.7%) cases. Antroduodenal involvement was noted in 11 (15.8%), hepatic flexure involvement in 8 (11.4%). Vascular encasement/thrombosis of the portal vein noted in 6 (8.6%). Metastasis at presentation was seen in 16 patients i.e., 22.9%. Majority patients presented with stage III and IV disease.
Conclusions: Single-center tertiary care oncology hospital study gives insight about imaging findings of carcinoma gallbladder. Authors conclude that multidetector CT is the diagnostic tool of choice in detection of gall bladder carcinoma, locoregional disease, distant metastasis and hence operability and non-operability of the disease.
References
Jindal G, Singal S, Birinder NA, Mittal A, Mittal S, Singal R. Role of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in evaluation of gallbladder malignancy and its pathological correlation in an Indian rural center. Maedica. 2018;13(1):55.
Konstantinidis IT, Bajpai S, Kambadakone AR, Tanabe KK, Berger DL, Zheng H. Gallbladder lesions identified on ultrasound. lessons from the last 10 years. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;3:549-53.
Tongdee R, Maroongroge P, Suthikeree W. The value of MDCT scans in differentiation between benign and malignant gallbladder wall thickening. J Med Assoc Thai. 2011;5:592-600.
Pandey M, Shukla RC, Shukla VK, Gaharwar S, Maurya BN. Biological behavior and disease pattern of carcinoma gallbladder shown on 64-slice CT scanner: a hospital-based retrospective observational study and our experience. Indian J Cancer. 2012;49(3):303.
Pandey M, Pathak AK, Gautam A, Aryya NC, Shukla VK. Carcinoma of the Gallbladder. Digestive diseases and sciences. 2001;46(6):1145-51.
Sachidananda S, Krishnan A, Janani K, Alexander CF, Velayutham V, Rajagopal S, et al. Characteristics of gall bladder cancer in South India. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2012;3:228-30.
Dwivedi S, Jain S, Dixit R. Gall bladder carcinoma: aggressive malignancy with protean loco-regional and distant spread. World J Clin Cases. 2015;3:231-44.
Kalra N, Suri S, Gupta R, Natarajan SK, Khandelwal N, Wig JD, et al. MDCT in the staging of gallbladder carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;3:758-62.
Levy AD, Murakata LA, Rohrmann CA. Gallbladder carcinoma: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2001;21(2):295-314.
Tsukada K, Kurosaki I, Uchida K. Lymph node spread from carcinoma of the gallbladder. Cancer. 1997; 80:661-7.
Kim SJ, Lee JM, Lee JY, Choi JY, Kim SH, Han JK, et al. Accuracy of preoperative T-staging of gallbladder carcinoma using MDCT. Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190(1):74-80.
Kim AY, Kim HJ, Ha HK. Gastric cancer by multidetector row CT: preoperative staging. Abdom Imag. 2005;30:465-72.
Filippone A, Ambrosini R, Fuschi M, Marinelli T, Genovesi D, Bonomo L. Preoperative T and N staging of colorectal cancer: accuracy of contrast-enhanced multi-detector row CT colonography-initial experience. Radiol. 2004;231:83-90.