A comparative study of mammography, sonography and infrared thermography in detection of cancer in breast


  • Suresh Badiger Department of Surgery, SDMCMSH Dharwad, Karnataka, India
  • Jayant Moger Department of Surgery, SDMCMSH Dharwad, Karnataka, India




Sonography, Mammography, Infrared thermography


Background: Breast cancer has emerged as the commonest cancer in Indian women. In a large population country like India we need a rapid, economical, and accurate investigation to diagnose breast cancer in its earlier stage. The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of mammography, sonography and infrared thermography in detection of breast cancer.

Methods: Patients presenting to the surgical OPD with suspicious breast lump were evaluated by infrared thermography, sonography and mammography followed by biopsy of the breast lump. Results of the all 3 above radiological modalities were compared with the histopathological biopsy for the presence of the cancer. The study was done between 1st December 2012 to 31st August 2014 in Sassoon General Hospitals attached to B. J. Government Medical College, Pune. We compared the performance of all diagnostic methods individually and in combination using the results from all patients. Statistical analysis was performed for all variables with fisher's exact test.

Results: Out of 50 patients, 31 patients had malignant breast lesions and 19 patients had benign lesions on biopsy. The mammography showed higher diagnostic accuracy and specificity than ultrasonography and thermography. As an individual modality the sensitivity of the sonography was higher than mammography and thermography.

Conclusions: Sonography is found to have higher sensitivity than mammography and infrared thermography but it is less specific than mammography. Mammography is found to be more specific (89.47%) than sonography and infrared thermography.

Author Biographies

Suresh Badiger, Department of Surgery, SDMCMSH Dharwad, Karnataka, India





Jayant Moger, Department of Surgery, SDMCMSH Dharwad, Karnataka, India




Gupta A, Shridhar K, Dhillon PK. A review of breast cancer awareness among women in India: cancer literate or awareness deficit. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51:2058-66.

Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in Globocan 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(5):359-86.

Agarwal G, Pradeep PV, Aggarwal V, Yip CH, Cheung PS. Spectrum of breast cancer in Asian women. World J Surg. 2007;31:1031-40.

Chopra B, Kaur V, Singh K, Verma M, Singh S, Singh A. Age shift: breast cancer is occurring in younger age groups. Clin Cancer Investig J. 2014;3:526-9.

Umadevi V. Framework for estimating tumour parameters using thermal imaging. Indian J Med Res. 2011;134(5)725-31.

Boquete L, Ortega S, Jimenez MJM, Rodriguez Ascariz JM, Blanco R. Automated detection of breast cancer in thermal infrared images, based on independent component analysis. J Med Syst. 2012;36:103-11.

Wishart GC, Campisi M, Boswell M, Chapman D, Shackleton V, Iddles S, et al. The accuracy of digital infrared imaging for breast cancer detection in women undergoing breast biopsy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2010;36:535-40.

Head JF, Wang F, Lipari CA, Elliott RL. The important role of infrared imaging in breast cancer. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 2000;19:52-7.

Delgado GF, Luna VJ, Hernandez VL, Espitia TS, Toledo MS, Patraca GC, et al. Feasibility of thermal infrared imaging screening for breast cancer in rural communities of Southern Mexico: The experience of the Centro de Estudiosy Prevencion del Cancer (CEPREC). Journal Clin Oncol. 2009;27(15):1521-2.

Li KY, Dong YG, Chen C. The non-invasive reconstruction of 3D temperature field in a biological body with Monte Carlo method. Neurocomputing. 2008;72:128-33.

Lawson R. Implications of surface temperature in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Canadian Med Association J. 1956;75:309-10.

Kennedy DA, Lee T, Seely D. A Comparative Review of Thermography as a Breast Cancer Screening Technique; Integrative Cancer Therapies. 2009;8(1):9-16.

Rassiwala M, Mathur P, Mathur R, Farid K, Shukla S, Gupta PK, et al. Evaluation of digital infrared thermal imaging as an adjunctive screening method for breast carcinoma. Int J Surg. 2014;12:1439-43.

Malur S, Wurdinger S, Moritz A, Michels W, Schneider A. Comparison of written reports of mammography, sonography and magnetic resonance mammography for preoperative evaluation of breast lesions, with special emphasis on magnetic resonance mammography. Breast Cancer Research. 2001;3(1):55-60.

Buchberger W, Kapferer M, Stoger A, Chemelli A, Judmaier W, Felber S. Dignity evaluation of focal mamma lesions: a prospective comparison between mammography, sonography and dynamic MR mammography. Radiology. 1995;35:86-8.

Tan KP, Alzan MZ, Rumaisa MP, Aisyah S, Murni MR, Radhika S, et al. The comparative accuracy of ultrasound and mammography in the detection of breast cancer. Med J Malaysia. 2014;69(2):79-85.

Elwood JM, Cox B, Richardson AK. The effectiveness of breast cancer screening by mammography in younger women. Online J Clin Trials. 1993;2:32.

Yaoa X, Weia W, Lia J, Wanga L, Liang ZX, Wana Y, et al. A comparison of mammography, ultrasonography, and far-infrared thermography with pathological results in screening and early diagnosis of breast cancer. Asian Biomed. 2014;8(1):11-9.

Wang J, Chang KJ, Chen CY, Chien KL, Tsai YS, Wu YM, et al. Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of infrared imaging of the breast: a preliminary study. Bio Medical Engineering Online J. 2010;9:3.

Kontos M, Wilson R, Fentiman I. Digital infrared thermal imaging (DITI) of breast lesions: sensitivity and specificity of detection of primary breast cancers. Clin Radiol. 2011;66:536-9.

Rassiwala M, Mathur P, Mathur R, Farid K, Shukla S, Gupta PK, et al. Evaluation of digital infra-red thermal imaging as an adjunctive screening method for breast carcinoma: a pilot study. Int J Surg. 2014;12(12);1439-43.

Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: An analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology - RSNA J. 2002;225(1):165-75.

Blume JD, Cormack JB, Mendelson EB, Lehrer D, Velez BM, Pisano ED, et al. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. J Am Med Assoc. 2008;299(18):2151-63.

Parisky YR, Sardi A, Hamm R. Efficacy of computerized infrared imaging analysis to evaluate mammographically suspicious lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180:263-9.






Original Research Articles