DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20203771

Improvement in semen parameters after varicocoelectomy

Sandeep Kumar, Sakshi Singh

Abstract


Background: Varicoceles are associated with abnormal sperm parameters. The difference is more marked in cases with infertility and higher grades of varicocele. Following ligation of varicocele, there is a significant improvement in the sperm counts.

Methods: The study was conducted in the department of general surgery at Maulana Azad Medical College and associated Lok Nayak Hospital from September 2012 to April 2014. The study was conducted on 40 numbers of patients. These were divided into 2 groups, group 1 (n=20) constituted of patients with varicocele who are symptomatic. Group 2 (n=20) constituted of patients with varicocele who are asymptomatic (infertile). All patients were evaluated by clinical examination and Doppler to grade the varicocele. All patients underwent detailed semen analysis. Patients of both the groups underwent FNAC of bilateral testes. The patients with clinical or Doppler detectable varicocele were taken up for low ligation of varicocele. Patients were followed up and all above parameters were repeated about 3 months after surgery.

Results: The sperm morphology, counts and motility increase significantly in group 2 patients and sperm counts and morphology increased significantly in group 1 while motility not increased significantly.

Conclusions: Most of the patients who presented to us were in the age group of 25-35 years. Longer duration of disease in patient with infertility is also suggestive of the fact that varicocele is a progressive disease and leads to testicular dysfunction over time leading to infertility. Most of the varicoceles were either left sided or bilateral


Keywords


Semen parameters, Varicocelectomy, Sperm count, Sperm morphology, Sperm motility

Full Text:

PDF

References


Beddy P, Geoghegan T, Browne RF, Torreggiani WC. Testicular varicoceles. Clin Radiol. 2005;60(12):1248-55.

Fideleff HL, Boquete HR, Suárez MG, Ruibal GF, Sobrado PG, Azaretsky M, et al. Controversies in the evolution of paediatric-adolescent varicocele: clinical, biochemical and histological studies. Eur J Endocrinol. 2000;143(6):775-81.

Shamsa A, Nademi M, Aqaee M, Fard AN, Molaei M. Complications and the effect of varicocelectomy on semen analysis, fertility, early ejaculation and spontaneous abortion. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2010;21(6):1100-5.

Cocuzza M, Cocuzza MA, Bragais FM, Agarwal A. The role of varicocele repair in the new era of assisted reproductive technology. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2008;63(3):395-404.

EisenbergML, Lipsshultz LI. Varicocele-induced infertility: Newer insights into its pathophysiology. Indian J Urol. 2011;27(1):58-64.

Kim SO, Jung H, Park K. Outcomes of microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy for painful varicoceles. J Androl. 2012;33(5):872-5.

Peng BC, Tomashefsky P, Nagler HM. The cofactor effect: varicocele and infertility. Fertil Steril. 1990; 54(1):143-8.

Chehval MJ, Purcell MH. Deterioration of semen parameters over time in men with untreated varicocele: evidence of progressive testicular damage. Fertil Steril. 1992;57(1):174-7.

Papadimas J, Mantalenakis S. Hormone profile in infertile men. Arch Androl. 1983;11(1):73-80.

Schlesinger MH, Wilets IF, Nagler HM. Treatment outcome after varicocelectomy. A critical analysis. UrolClin North Am. 1994;21(3):517-29.

Oster J. Varicocele in children and adolescents. An investigation of the incidence among Danish school children. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1971;5:27-32.