Comparison of pre-operative ultrasonography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with intra-operative surgical findings among patients suspicious to choledocholithiasis


  • Pulak Kumar Samanta Department of General Surgery, Bankura Sammilani Medical College, West Bengal
  • Rathin Sarkar Department of General Surgery, Bankura Sammilani Medical College, West Bengal
  • Sabyasachi Bakshi Department of General Surgery, Bankura Sammilani Medical College, West Bengal



Choledocholithiasis, Ultrasonography, MRCP, Obstructive jaundice


Background: Choledocholithiasis with cholelithiasis is a common problem in the middle and older age group people. Aim of this study is to assess the usefulness of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis in resource poor set up.

Methods: After matching the inclusion and exclusion criteria, all cases of diagnosed choledocholithiasis were taken for this prospective, single center, observational study.

Results: Out of total 130 subjects, 41 were male and 89 were female. Increased incidence of choledocholithiasis was found in females (M:F=1:2.08). The mean age of presentation was 49.27±10.60 years. Ultrasonography was able to diagnose common bile duct (CBD) stones in 57 patients (43.84%) and ductal dilatation in 89 (68.46%). Whereas, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) detected CBD stones in 112 (86.15%). Cholelithiasis was associated with choledocholithiasis in 108 patients (83.07%).

Conclusions: In the evaluation of choledocholithiasis, in our study particularly trans-abdominal ultrasonography (USG) seemed to have a lower yield than expected for accuracy in determining choledocholithiasis when compared to MRCP and Intra-operative findings. So, a negative USG in a particular may not exclude choledocholithiasis. So, MRCP is the ‘investigation of choice’ among the suspicious patients for CBD stone disease. That is why prior to cholecystectomy in symptomatic patients with deranged liver function test, MRCP always to be done, to detect the missed stone in CBD.

Author Biographies

Pulak Kumar Samanta, Department of General Surgery, Bankura Sammilani Medical College, West Bengal

General Surgery

Rathin Sarkar, Department of General Surgery, Bankura Sammilani Medical College, West Bengal

General Surgery

Sabyasachi Bakshi, Department of General Surgery, Bankura Sammilani Medical College, West Bengal

Department of General Surgery


Mcfadden DW, Nigam A. Choledocholithiasis and cholangitis. In: Zinner MJ, Ashley SW, eds. Maingot’s abdominal operaions. 11th edn. Mcgraw-Hill; 2007: 865-879.

Topal B, Van de Moortel M, Fieuws S, Vanbeckevoort D, Van Steenbergen W, Aerts R, et al. The value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in predicting common bile duct stones in patients with gallstone disease. Br J Surg. 2003;90:42-7.

Duensing RA, Williams RA, Collins JC, Wilson SE. Managing choledocholithiasis in the laparoscopic era. Am J Surg. 1995;170:619-21.

Yang MH, Chen TH, Wang SE, Tsai YF, Su CH, Wu CW, et al. Biochemical predictors for absence of common bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecy-stectomy. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:1620-4.

Jinfeng Z, Yin Y, Chi Z, Junye G. Management of impacted common bile duct stones during a laparoscopic procedure: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 377 Consecutive Patients. Int J Surg. 2016;32:1-5.

Song SH, Kwon CI, Jin SM, Park HJ, Chung CW, Kwon SW, et al. Clinical characteristics of acute cholecystitis with elevated liver enzymes not associated with choledocholithiasis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;26:452-7.

Chavda V. Choledocholithiasis: An update on current evidence and practice. Med Res Arch. 2017;5(2):1-19.

Wallner BK, Schumacher KA, Weidenmaier W. Fariedrich JM. Dilated biliary tract: evaluation with MR Cholangiography with a T2 weighted contrast-enhanced fast sequence. Radiology. 1991;181:805-8.

Goyani B, Ukani B, Patel M, Shah B, Vadel M. Ultrasonography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography correlation in patients with obstructive jaundice. Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2015;4:1010-4.

Sakijan AS, Atan M. Choledocholithiasis: Diagnosis By Ultrasound. Med. Malaysia. 1987;42(2):115-8.

Meyers WC, Jones RS. Development of the liver and biliary tract In: Meyers WC Jones RS (editors). Textbook of liver and biliary surgery. J.B. Lippincott Company. 1990;1:1-19.

Sugiyama M, Atomi Y. Endoscopic ultrasonography for diagnosing choledocholithiasis: a prospective comparative study with ultrasonography and computed tomography. Gastrointest Endosc 1997;45(2):143-6.

Liu TH, Consorti ET, Kawashima A, Ernst RD, Black CT, Greger PH, et al. The efficacy of magnetic resonance cholangiography for the evaluation of patients with suspected choledocholithiasis before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 1999;178:480-4.

Gross BH et al, Ultrasonic evaluation of Common Bile Duct stones: Prospective comparison with Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography, Radiology 1983;146:471-4.

Hunt DR, Reiter L, Scott AJ. Preoperative ultrasound measurement of bile duct diameter: Basis of selective cholangiography. Aust NZ J Surg. 1990;60:189-92.

Laing FC, Jeffrey RB Jr. Choledocholithiasis and Cystic Duct obstruction: Difficult ultrasonographic diagnosis, Radiology. 1983;146:475-9.

Ferrari FS, Fantozzi F, Tasciotti L, Vigni F, Scotto F, Frasci P. US, MRCP, CCT and ERCP: a comparative study in 131 patients with suspected biliary obstruction. Med Sci Monit. 2005;11(3):8- 18.

Guibaud L, Bret PM, Reinhold C, Atri M, Barkun AN. Bile duct obstruction and choledocholithiasis: diagnosis with MR cholangiography. Radiology. 1995;197(1):109-15.






Original Research Articles