DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20202399

Role of subcutaneous vacuum suction drain in prevention of abdominal wound complication in emergency laparotomy

Vinod Kumar Pandey, Dhruv Chandra, Raj Kumar, Anil Singh, Tej Pratap, Shubham Agarwal, Ashish Yadav

Abstract


Background: Some of the most common wound complications following laparotomy include hematoma formation, seroma formation, wound infection, burst abdomen and wound dehiscence. Closed-suction drains (CSDs) help to drain any wound collection and also reduce any dead space in the wound thereby promoting healing and preventing complication.

Methods: We conducted a prospective study and included patients presenting with acute abdomen in emergency department. Patients were selected as per inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two groups (group A and B) with equal number of patients were created based on closed envelope technique. CSD was placed in the wound of patients in group A. Wound healing and complications were compared between the two groups.

Results: 50 patients were included in the study with 25 in each group. Hematoma formation was found to be significantly more among group B (24.0%) compared to group A (4.0%). Seroma formation (p value =0.03917), SSI rate (p value =0.039) and wound dehiscence/burst abdomen (p value =0.0415) was more in group B than group A. The mean wound healing time (days) and mean hospital stay (days) was significantly more in group B.

Conclusions: Placing a subcutaneous vacuum suction drain at the time of abdominal wall closure during emergency laparotomy results in better wound healing and reduces postoperative wound complication, hospital stay time, morbidity and also decreases overall healthcare cost.


Keywords


Subcutaneous vacuum suction drains abdominal wound, Wound complication, Emergency laparotomy, Post laparotomy complication, Suction drain

Full Text:

PDF

References


Harmon LA, Husen VR, Roberts EK. Abdominal closure. Medscape. 2017. Available at: https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1961789-overview. Accessed on 18 October 2018.

Bruce J, Russell EM, Millinson J, Krukowksi ZH. The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events. Health Tech Assess. 2001;5:1-194.

Shikhman A, Tuma F. Abdominal Hematoma. Last Updated 16 June 2019. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK519551/. Accessed on 18 October 2019.

Coello R, Charlett AJ, Wilson V, Pearson WA, Borriello P. Adverse impact of surgical site infections in English hospitals. J Hospital Infection. 2005;60(2):93-103.

Kujath P, Kujath C. Complicated skin, skin structure and soft tissue infections - are we threatened by multi-resistant pathogens. European J Med Res. 2010;15:544-53.

Olson MM, Lee JT. Continuous, 10 years wound infection surveillance. Results, advantages, and unanswered questions. Arch Surg. 1990;125:794-803.

Cruse PJ, Foord R. The epidemiology of wound infection. A 10 years prospective study of 62,939 wounds. Surg Clin North Am. 1980;60:27-40.

Mahmoud NN, Turpin RS, Yang G, Saunders WB. Impact of surgical site infections on length of stay and costs in selected colorectal procedures. Surg Infect. 2009;10:539-44.

Reilly J, Twaddle S, McIntosh J, Kean L. An economic analysis of surgical Bibliography 47 wound infection. J Hosp Infect. 2001;49:245-9.

Sahu SK, Shergill JS, Sachan PK, Gupta P. Superficial Incisional Surgical Site Infection in Elective Abdominal Surgeries - A Prospective Study. Internet J Surg. 2011;26:1.

Diana M, Hubner M, Eisenring MC, Zanetti G, Troillet N, Demartines N. Measures to prevent surgical site infections: what surgeons (should) do. World J Surg. 2011;35(2):280-8.

Darouiche RO, Wall MJ, Itani KMF. Chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone-iodine for surgical site antisepsis. New England J Med. 2010;362(1):18-26.

Alexander JW, Fischer JE, Boyajian M, Palmquist J, Morris MJ. The influence of hair-removal methods on wound infections. Archives Surg. 1983;118(3):347-52.

Murray BW, Huerta S, Dineen S, Anthony T. Surgical site infection in colorectal surgery: a review of the nonpharmacologic tools of prevention. J Am College Surg. 2010;211(6):812-22.

Manzoor B, Heywood N, Sharma A. Review of subcutaneous wound drainage in reducing surgical site infections after laparotomy. Surg Res Pract. 2015:1-6.

Dougherty SH, Simmons RL. The biology and practice of surgical drains. Part 1. Curr Probl Surg. 1992;29:559-623.

Sadoshima J, Izumo S. Mechanical stretch rapidly activates multiple signal transduction pathways in cardiac myocytes: potential involvement of an autocrine/poracrine mechanism. EMBO J. 1993;12:1681-92.

Subramonia S, Pankhurst S, Rowlands BJ, Lobo DN. Vacuum assisted closure of postoperative abdominal wounds: a prospective study. World J Surg. 2009;33:931-7.

Baier PK, Gluck NC, Baumgartner U, Adam U, Fischer A, Hopt UT. Subcutaneous Redon drains do not reduce the incidence of surgical site infections Bibliography 51 after laparotomy. A randomized controlled trial on 200 patients. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2010;25:639-43.

Numata M, Tanabe H, Numata K, Suzuki Y, Tani K, Shiraishi R, et al. The efficacy of subcutaneous penrose drains for the prevention of superficial surgical site infections. Jpn J Gastroenterol Surg. 2010;43:221-8.

Gupta P, Kumar R. Role of subcutaneous suction drain in reducing surgical site infections after emergency laparotomy. Int Surg J. 2017;4:2717-20.

Razavi SM, Ibrahimpoor M, Sabouri A, Jafarian KA. Abdominal surgical site infections: incidence and risk factors at an Iranian teaching hospital. BMC surgery. 2005;5(2):3-5.

Renvall S, Aho NAJ. Wound infection in abdominal surgery: a prospective study on 696 operations. Acta Chir Scand. 1980;146(1):25-30.

Ussiri EV, Mkony CA, Aziz MR. Surgical wound infection in clean-contaminated and contaminated laparotomy wounds at Muhimbili National Hospital. East Cent Afr J S. 2005;10:19-23.

Khan M, Khalil J, Muqim R. Rate and risk factors for surgical site infection at a tertiary care facility in Peshawar, Pakistan. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2011;23:1-4.

Nguyen D, Leod MB, Phung DC. Incidence and predictors of surgical site Bibliography 52 infections in Vietnam. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2001;22:485-92.

Vaghani YL, Chaudhari J, Navadiya S. A Study of subcutaneous negative pressure closure versus closure in laparotomy wound of Ileal perforation. Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2014;3:24-6.

Adejumo AA, Nuhu M, Afolaranmi T. Incidence of and risk factors for abdominal surgical site infection in a Nigerian tertiary care centre. Int J Infect Control. 2015;11:4.

Fujii T, Tabe Y, Yajima R, Yamaguchi S, Tsutsumi S, Asao T, et al. Effects of subcutaneous drain for the prevention of incisional SSI in high-risk patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011;26(9):1151-5.

Patel BJ, Patel KH, Kharadi A, Panchal B. Role of subcutaneous corrugated drain in class IV surgical wound. Int Surg J. 2015;2:252-5.

Chowdri NA, Qadri SA, Parray FQ, Gagloo MA. Role of subcutaneous drains in obese patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy: A cohort study. Int J Surg. 2007;5:404-7.

Vashist M, Singla A, Malik V, Verma M. Abdominal Wall Closure in The Presence of Sepsis: Role of Negative Suction. Internet J Surg. 2013;29(1):407-12.