DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20201166

A study on outcome of primary closure versus open fistulectomy in low level fistula in ano

Maruti Basa, Karnati Prakash

Abstract


Background: Fistula-in-ano is one of the common ano-rectal disorder which causes appreciable morbidity and inconvenience to the patient. Different surgical techniques have been described in literature from time to time. Open fistulectomy though considered as the standard treatment for fistula in-ano, fistulectomy with primary closure has its merits of short hospital stay, early wound healing and lower costs. The objectives of this study was to compare the period of stay, period of healing, time period to return to daily activities and cost factor between open fistulectomy and primary closure technique.

Methods: Patients admitted in all surgical units of NIMRA Hospital, were included in the study without bias on a serial basis. This is a study comprising 50 patients over a period of 12 months from Febrauary 2019 to January 2020.

Results: The patients were divided into two equal and comparable groups. Patients who underwent open fistulectomy were classified under Group I and those who underwent fistulectomy with primary closure were classified as Group II. The patient’s characteristics of the two groups were well matched.

Conclusions: In patients treated by classical method because of long time taken to heal, number of hospital visits for dressings were more and more antibiotics were prescribed when compared to cases treated by excision of fistula tract and primary closure. From this study it can be concluded that fistulectomy with primary closure is ideal for low anal fistulaures.


Keywords


Fistula in ano, Fistulectomy, Goodsal's Rule

Full Text:

PDF

References


Parks AG, Gordon PH, Hardcastle JD. A classification of fistula-in-ano. Br J Surg. 1976;63(1):1-12.

Corman ML. Anal fistula. Colon and Rectal Surgery. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2005: 287.

Sileri P, Cadeddu F, D'Ugo S, Blanco G. Surgery for fistulain-ano in a specialist colorectal unit: a critical appraisal. BMC Gastroenterol. 2011;11(1):55-9.

Chung W, Kazemi P, Ko D, Sun C, Brown MCJ, Phang T. Anal fistula plug and fibrin glue versus conventional treatment in repair of complex anal fistulas. Am J Surg. 2009;197:604-8.

Prakash SS, Prabha JC. A comparitive study of laying open of wound vs primary closure in fistula in ano. IOSRJDMS. 2014;13(9):39-45.

Shahbaz CM, Ghazanfar A, Goraya AR. Comparative study of fistulectomy and fistulotomy with primary repair for low fistula-in-ano. Aprjun. 2002;8(2):87-90.

Hamalainen KP, Sainio AP. Incidence of fistulas after drainage of acute anorectal abscesses. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41(11):1357-61.

Vasilevsky CA, Gordon PH. Benign Anorectal: abscess and fistula. In: Wolff BG, Fleshman JW, Beck DE, Pemberton JH, Wexner SD. The ASCRS Textbook of Colon and Rectal Surgery. New York, NY: Springer; 2007: 228-231.

Ani AN, Solanke TF. Anal fistula: a review of 82 cases. Dis Colon Rectum. 1976;19(1):51-5.

Bhuyan C, Dudhamal TS, Gupta SK. A clinical study of bahgandara (fistula-in-ano) treated with apamarga ksharasutra of 3719 cases. Indian J Ancient Med Yoga. 2013;6(4):178-81.

Damor S, Vohra A, Patel H, Kumar P. Comparative study between primary closure method versus open method of fistulectomy for fistula in ano. Int J Res Med. 2016; 2(1):33-7.

Lasheen AE, Safwat K, Sieda B, Baiomy M, Ismaeil A, Allam Z, Awad W. Fistulectomy and primary repair of wound and anal sphincter by Lasheen's sutures for high perianal fistula. Edorium J Surg. 2015;2:16-20.

Singh BK, Ravi KM, Vineet CH, Vansh GY, Akhilesh S. Comparative study of open and closed fistulectomy for fistula in ano. research and reviews. J Surg. 2013;2(3):77-9.

Toccaceli S, Minervini S. Fistulectomy with closure by first intention in the treatment of perianal fistulae. Minerva Chir. 1997;52(4):377-81.

Satyaprakash, Lakshratan V, Gajendran V. Fistula in ano: treatment by fistulectomy, primary closure and reconstitution. Aus Coll Surg J. 2008;55(1);23-7.