A study of collagen dressing versus conventional dressings in burns at tertiary health care centre
Keywords:Collagen dressing, Conventional dressings, Burns
Background: Worldwide, burn injury is a problem and cause intense pain, biological dressings like collagen as it forms physiological interface prevents infection effective for burn wound healing. The objective of the study was to study of collagen dressing versus conventional dressings in burns at tertiary health care centre.
Methods: This was a cross sectional study carried out in the Department of Surgery during September 2018 to September 2019. Out of 50 patients, 25 were enrolled to collagen treatment group (group A) and remaining into conventional treatment group i.e. (group B). The statistical analysis was done by unpaired t-test and chi-square test.
Results: Average less time required for granulation tissue to appear p<0.001, df=48, t=4.56); average less time requires for sterile wound swab culture (weeks) (p<0.05, df=48, t=3.45); less discomfort score (0-10) (p<0.001, df=48, t=6.78); less dressing removal pain score (0-10) (p<0.0001, df=48, t=9.87); less average time required for complete healing (days ) (p<0.001, df=48, t=7.79).
Conclusions: It can be concluded that collagen dressings were superior to conventional dressing in wound healing of burns.
World Health Organization. Mock C, Peck M, Peden M, Krug E, eds. A WHO plan for burn prevention and care. Geneva, World Health Organization. 2008.
Outwater AH, Ismail H, Mgalilwa L, Justin Temu M, Mbembati NA. Burns in Tanzania: morbidity and mortality, causes and risk factors: a review. Int J Burn Trauma. 2013;3(1):18-29.
Mike W. Watson’s clinical nursing and related sciences. 6th edition. Baillieres Tindall publications; 2002.
Oladele AO, Olabanji JK. Burns in Nigeria: a review. Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2010;23(3):120-7.
Shrivastava PS, Shrivastava SR. An epidemiological study of adult female burns patients admitted in a tertiary care hospital. Prog Health Sci. 2010;2(2)1-7.
Batra AK. Burn mortality: recent trends and socio-cultural determinants in rural India. Burns. 2003;29(3):270-5.
Park SN, Lee HJ, Lee KH, Suh H. Biological characterization of EDC-crosslinked collagen-hyaluronic acid matrix in dermal tissue restoration. Biomaterials. 2003;24:1631-41.
Lazovic G, Colic M, Grubor M, Jovanovic M. The application of collagen sheet in open wound healing. Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2005;18:151-6.
Horch RE, Stark GB. Comparison of the effect of a collagen dressing and polyurethane dressing on healing of split thickness skin graft donor sites. Scand J Plast Reconst Surg Hand Surg. 1998;32:407-13.
Veves A, Sheehan P, Pham HT. A randomized, controlled trial of promogran (a collagen/oxidized regenerated cellulose dressing) vs standard treatment in the management of diabetic foot ulcers. Arch Surg. 2002;137:822-7.
Nataraj C, Ritter G, Dumas S, Helfer FD, Brunelle J, Sander TW. Extra cellular wound matrices: Novel stabilization and sterilization method for collagen-based biologic wound dressings. Wounds. 2007;19:148-56.
Nagata H, Ueki H, Moriguchi T. Fibronectin: Localization in normal human skin, granulation tissue, hypertrophic scar, mature scar, progressive systemic sclerotic skin, and other fibrosing dermatoses. Arch Dermatol. 1985;121:995-9.
Motta G, Ratto GB, De Barbieri A, Corte G, Zardi L, Sacco A, et al. Can heterologous collagen enhance the granulation tissue growth? An experimental study. Ital J Surg Sci. 1983;13:101-8.
Chung J, Wang XQ, Lindberg FP, Frazier WA. Thrombospondin-1 acts via IAP/CD47 to synergize with collagen in alpha2beta1-mediated platelet activation. Blood. 1999;94:642-8.
Singh O, Gupta SS, Soni M. Collagen Dressing Versus Conventional Dressings in Burn and Chronic Wounds: A Retrospective Study. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2011;4(1):12-6.
Ramesh BA, Jayalakshmi BK, Mohan J. A comparative study of collagen dressing versus petrolatum gauze dressing in reducing pain at the donor area. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2017;10:18-21.