Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a resource-poor setting: improving safety during the learning curve

Authors

  • Arpit Mathew Assistant Professor, Christian Medical College, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
  • Lurstep Wanshnong Consultant Surgeon, Dr. H. Gordon Roberts Hospital, Shillong, Meghalaya, India
  • Cornerstone Wann Department of Urology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20160236

Keywords:

Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Learning curve, Safe surgery

Abstract

Background: Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy is becoming a widely performed operation with various techniques and special instruments having been developed for the procedure. However, these tend to increase the cost of the operation and hence are not always feasible options in smaller centres with poor patients. We describe a safe, low cost operation that involves the same equipment and instruments as the conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy and draw conclusions on the steps to improve safety during the learning curve.

Methods: The study was conducted on 35 patients who underwent Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy out of 212 who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy at a secondary level charitable hospital in Shillong, Meghalaya, India from November 2009 to March 2011.

Results: With careful case selection, single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy was safely performed on 35 patients. 2 tall patients required an additional port in the epigastrium since the instruments were not long enough to comfortably reach the Calot’s triangle. One patient developed a wound infection after 3 weeks and there were no other reported complications or incidence of hernia after 4 years.

Conclusions: With wise patient selection, proficiency in 3-port cholecystectomy, demonstration of the critical view of safety, proper placement of the ports and utilisation of standard laparoscopic instruments, single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be safely performed without major complications and at no increased cost even in smaller hospitals without specialised training in the procedure.

 

References

Navarra G, Pozza E, Occhionorelli S, Carcoforo P, Donini I. One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 1997;84:695.

Bhandarkar D, Mittal G, Shah R, Katara A, Udwadia TE. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: How I do it? Journal of Minimal Access Surgery. 2011;7(1):17-23.

Love KM, Durham CA, Meara MP, Mays AC, Bower CE. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a cost comparison. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(5):1553-8.

Rivas H, Varela E, Scott D. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial evaluation of a large series of patients. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(6):1403-12.

Antoniou SA, Pointner R, Granderath FA. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy; a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2010;25:367-7.

Han HJ, Choi SB, Kim WB, Choi SY. Single-incision multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy: things to overcome. Arch Surg. 2011;146(1):68-73.

Dominguez G, Durand L, De Rosa J, Danguise E, Arozamena C, Ferraina PA. Retraction and triangulation with neodymium magnetic forceps for single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:1660-6.

Khambaty F, Brody F, Vaziri K, Edwards C. Laparoscopic versus single-incision cholecystectomy. World J Surg. 2011;35(5):967-72.

Prasad A, Mukherjee KA, Kaul S, Kaur M. Postoperative pain after cholecystectomy: Conventional laparoscopy versus single-incision laparoscopic surgery. Journal of Minimal Access Surgery. 2011;7(1):24-7.

Solomon D, Bell R, Duffy A, Roberts K. Single-port cholecystectomy: small scar, short learning curve. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:2954-7.

Sinha R, Yadav AS. Transumbilical single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy with conventional instruments: A continuing study. Journal of Minimal Access Surgery. 2014;10(4):175-9.

Sinha R. Transumbilical single- incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy with conventional instruments and ports: the way forward? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2011;21(6):497-503.

Downloads

Published

2016-12-13

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles