An audit to study the diagnostic yield of lymph node biopsies under local anaesthesia

Authors

  • Coelho Victor Department of Surgery I.V., Christian medical college and hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Albert A. Kota Department of Surgery I.V., Christian medical college and hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Lalchandami Colney Department of Surgery I.V., Christian medical college and hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Beulah Roopavathana Department of Surgery I.V., Christian medical college and hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Suchita Chase Department of Surgery I.V., Christian medical college and hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Sukria Nayak Department of Surgery I.V., Christian medical college and hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20202385

Keywords:

Audit, Haematological malignancy, Infectious disease, Lymphadenopathy, Lymph node biopsy, Outpatients

Abstract

Background: Surgical referrals for lymph node biopsies are common, majority for diagnostic purposes. The indications and the diagnostic yield vary for different sites. We conducted an audit of the lymph node biopsies done over a period of seven months.

Methods: The audit included 547 patients who underwent lymph node biopsies under local anesthesia in the department of general surgery over a seven-month period. Parameters such as overall diagnostic yield of lymph node biopsies, disease specific yield of lymph node biopsies with a primary focus on tuberculosis; site specific yield of lymph node biopsies and  referral pattern for the request for lymph node biopsies were analysed.

Results: 324 samples (59.2%) yielded a definite diagnosis, which included haematological malignancy 102 (31.5%), infectious diseases 131 (40.5%), and 59 (18.5%) malignancy. The diagnostic yield of supraclavicular lymph nodes was found to be highest (72.45%) and the axillary group the lowest (39.8%). The referral pattern seen was 314 (57.4%) from General medicine, 149 (27.2%) from General Surgery, and 84 (15.4%) from Haematology. 130 (23.8%) samples were tested for tuberculosis; the highest yield, acquired from the cervical group (52.8%), lowest from the inguinal region (4%).

Conclusions: Our audit revealed significant diagnostic yield of lymph node biopsies from the supraclavicular region. Majority of them were of infectious aetiology and referred from General Medicine. This study supports the introduction of co-ordinated problem-based referral and management pathways for the management of patients with enlarged superficial lymph nodes, supported by regular audits of practice.

References

Lee YTN, Terry R, Lukes RJ. Biopsy of peripheral lymph nodes. Am Surg. 1982;48:536-9.

Chua CL. The value of cervical lymph node biopsy-A Surgical Audit. Aust NZ J Surg. 1986;56(4):335-9.

Lake AM, Oski FA. Peripheral lymphadenopathy in childhood. Ten-year experience in excisional biopsy. Am J Dis Child. 1978;132:357-9.

Sinclair S, Beckman E, Ellman L. Biopsy of enlarged superficial lymph nodes. JAMA. 1974;228:602-3.

Barton LL, Feigin RD. Childhood cervical lymphadenopathy: a re-appraisal. J Pediatr. 1974;84:846-52.

Saltzstein SR. The fate of patients with non-diagnostic lymph node biopsy. Surgery. 1963;58:659-62.

Moore RD, Weisberger AS, Bowerfind ES. An evaluation of lymphadenopathy in systemic disease. Arch Intern Med. 1957;99:751-9.

Connolly AAP, MacKenzie K. Paediatric neck masses- a diagnostic dilemma. J Laryngol Otol. 1997;111:5415.

Zuelzer WW, Kaplan J. The child with lymphadenopathy. Semin Hematol. 1975;12:323-4.

Kumar V, Fausto N, Abbas A. Robbins and Cotran Pathologic Basis of Disease. 7th Edn. Elsevier Saunders; 2004.

Hadadi A, Tajik P, Rasoolinejad M, Davoudi S, Mohraz M. Pulmonary tuberculosis in patients with HIV/AIDS in Iran. Iran J Public Health. 2011;40(1):100-6.

Gupta V, Bhake A. Molecular diagnosis of tubercular lymphadenopathy from fine-needle aspirates in pediatric patients. Acta Cytol. 2017;61(3):173-8.

Alam K, Khan A, Siddiqui F, Jain A, Haider N, Maheshwari V. Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC): A handy tool for metastatic lymphadenopathy. Int J Pathol. 2010;10:2.

Khajuria R, Goswami KC, Singh K, Dubey VK. Pattern of lymphadenopathy on fine needle aspiration cytology in Jammu. JK Sci. 2006;8:157-9.

Demharter J, Müller P, Wagner T, Schlimok G, Haude K, Bohndorf K. Percutaneous core-needle biopsy of enlarged lymph nodes in the diagnosis and subclassification of malignant lymphomas. Eur Radiol. 2001;11(2):276-83.

Margolis IB, Matteucci D, Organ Jr. CH. To improve the yield of biopsy of the lymph nodes. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1978;147:376-8.

Doberneck RC. The diagnostic yield of lymph node biopsy. Arch Surg. 1983;118:1203-5.

Artenstein AW, Kim JH, Williams WJ, Chung RC. Isolated peripheral tuberculous lymphadenitis in adults: current clinical and diagnostic issues. Clin Infect Dis. 1995;20:876-82.

Centers for disease control and prevention. Reported tuberculosis in the United States; 2005.

Sharma SK, Mohan A. Extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Indian J Med Res. 2004;120:316-53.

Memish ZA, Mah MW, Al Mahmood S, Bannatyne RM, Khan MY. Clinico-diagnostic experience with tuberculous lymphadenitis in Saudi Arabia. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2000;6(3):137-41.

Antel K, Verburgh E. Lymphadenopathy in a tuberculosis-endemic area: Diagnostic pitfalls and suggested approach. South Afr Med J. 2019;109(10):712-4.

Downloads

Published

2020-05-26

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles