DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20200298

Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis score for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in comparison with the Alvarado score

Mannem G. K. Reddy, V. Mahidhar Reddy

Abstract


Background: Different scoring systems have been created to increase diagnostic accuracy, and they are inexpensive, non-invasive, and easy to use and reproduce. The modified Alvarado score is widely used in emergency services. The Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis (RIPASA) score was formulated in 2010 and has greater sensitivity and specificity. The aim of our article was to compare the usefulness of modified RIPASA score and Alvarado score in the diagnosis of patients with abdominal pain and suspected acute appendicitis.

Methods: A prospective study was undertaken among 100 cases presenting with signs and symptoms suggestive of acute appendicitis, conducted at the Narayana medical college hospital, Nellore. The questionnaires used for the evaluation process were applied to the patients suspected of having appendicitis.

Results: A total of 100 patients, 95% underwent laparoscopic procedure. The cut-off threshold point of the Alvarado score was set at 7.0, which yielded a sensitivity of 65% and a specificity of 52%. The positive predictive value was 65%. The cut-off threshold point of the modified RIPASA score was set at 7.5, which yielded 90% sensitivity and 72% specificity. The positive predictive value was 89% and the NPV was 30%.

Conclusions: On comparing both the scores, sensitivity and specificity was higher for modified RIPASA score. The positive predictive value was higher for the Alvarado and negative predictive value was higher for RIPASA score. Bothe p values were statistically significant.


Keywords


Appendicitis, Modified Alvarado score, RIPASA scale, Sensitivity, Specificity

Full Text:

PDF

References


Chong CF, Adi MI, Thien A, Suyoi A, Mackie AJ, Tin AS, et al. Development of the RIPASA score: a new appendicitis scoring system for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Sing Med J. 2010;51(3):220.

Reyes-García N, Zaldívar-Ramírez FR, Cruz-Martínez R, Sandoval-Martínez MD, Gutiérrez-Banda CA, Athié-Gutiérrez C. Diagnostic precision of the RIPASA scale for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a comparative analysis with the Alvarado scale modified. Gene Surg. 2012;34(2):101-6.

Sammalkorpi HE, Mentula P, Leppäniemi A. A new adult appendicitis score improves diagnostic accuracy of acute appendicitis-a prospective study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2014;14(1):114.

Butt MQ, Chatha SS, Ghumman AQ, Farooq M. RIPASA score: a new diagnostic score for diagnosis of acute appendicitis. J Coll Phys Surg Pak. 2014;24(12):894-7.

Erdem H, Çetinkünar S, Daş K, Reyhan E, Değer C, Aziret M, et al. Alvarado, Eskelinen, Ohhmann and Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha appendicitis scores for diagnosis of acute appendicitis. World J Gastroenterol: WJG. 2013 Dec 21;19(47):9057.

Alvarado A. A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Annal Emerg Med. 1986;15(5):557-64.

Kalan M, Talbot D, Cunliffe WJ, Rich AJ. Evaluation of the modified Alvarado score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a prospective study. Ann Royal Coll Surg Eng. 1994;76(6):418.

Gamal R, Moore TC. Appendicitis in children aged 13 years and younger. Am J Surg. 1990;159(6):589-92.

Adolph VR, Falterman KW. Appendicitis in children in the managed care era. J Pediatr Surg. 1996;31(8):1035-7.

Ramachandran P, Sivit CJ, Newman KD, Schwartz MZ. Ultrasonography as an adjunct in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a 4-year experience. J Pediatr Surg. 1996;31(1):164-9.

Davidson PM, Douglas CD, Hosking CS. Graded compression ultrasonography in the assessment of the “tough decision” acute abdomen in childhood. Pediatr Surg Int. 1999;15(1):32-5.

Rao PM, Rhea JT, Rattner DW, Venus LG, Novelline RA. Introduction of appendiceal CT: impact on negative appendectomy and appendiceal perforation rates. Ann Surg. 1999;229(3):344.

Walker SJ, West CR, Colmer MR. Acute appendicitis: does removal of a normal appendix matter, what is the value of diagnostic accuracy and is surgical delay important?. Ann Royal Coll Surg Eng. 1995;77(5):358.

Naveen K, Sareesh NN, Satheesha BN, Murlimanju BV, Suhani S, Mamatha H, Sampath PK. Appendicitis and Appendectomy: A Retrospective Survey in South Indian Population. J Surg Acad. 2013;3(2):10-3.

Park JS, Jeong JH, Lee JI, Lee JH, Park JK, Moon HJ. Accuracies of diagnostic methods for acute appendicitis. Am Surg. 2013;79(1):101-6.

Sakpal SV, Bindra SS, Chamberlain RS. Laparoscopic appendectomy conversion rates two decades later: an analysis of surgeon and patient-specific factors resulting in open conversion. J Surg Res. 2012;176(1):42-9.

Díaz-Barrientos CZ, Aquino-González A, Heredia-Montaño M, Navarro-Tovar F, Pineda-Espinosa MA, de Santillana IE. The RIPASA score for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: A comparison with the modified Alvarado score. Revista de Gastroenterología de México (English Edition). 2018;1;83(2):112-6.

Walczak DA, Pawełczak D, Żółtaszek A, Jaguścik R, Fałek W, Czerwińska M, et al. The value of scoring systems for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Polish J Surg. 2015;87(2):65-70.

Kumar R. To Evaluate Use of Combined Modified Ripasa Scoring and Ultrasonography to Improve Diagnostic Accuracyin Acute Appendicitis. J Med Sci Clin Res. 2017;05(5):21643-50.

Rathod S, Ali I, Bawa AP, Singh G, Mishra S, Nongmaithem M. Evaluation of Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis score: A new appendicitis scoring system. Med J Dr. DY Patil Uni. 2015;8(6):744.