Surgical intervention using ellipse technique in treatment of gynecomastia

Authors

  • Mohamed Hamdy Elghotmy Department of Intensive Care and Pain Management, Mistry of Health, Menoufia, Egypt

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20195383

Keywords:

Ellipse technique, Gynecomastia, Outcomes, Simon’s classification, Surgical intervention

Abstract

Background: The objective of the study was to evaluate the outcome of the ellipse technique in 10 Egyptian patients in contrast with state-of-the-art practice cited in the medical literature.

Methods: A prospective comparative study was carried out on 10 consecutive patients with grade III (Simon’s classification) gynecomastia presenting to the outpatient clinic at Menoufia university hospital, Menoufia, Egypt during the period during from June 2015 to march 2018. History taking, local examination, radiological examination and laboratories investigation were done.

Results: Mean age of patients was 29.3 years. The BMI of the patients ranged from 32.3 kg/m2 to 37 kg/m2 with a mean BMI of 34.82 kg/m2. All patients showed good wound healing when dressings were removed at the 10-day interval. The scars showed maturation at around 10 to 12 months. None of the patients had a major complication such as infection, hematoma, seroma, or nipple-areola complex necrosis. There were no early postoperative complications apart from moderate bruising in 3 patients. Late complications included slowly resolving hypoesthesia in two patients. This was a transient complication that resolved completely. No patient required revision surgery.

Conclusions: The technique allows precise control of the final shape and contour of the corrected chest wall with proper positioning of the nipple-areola complex without a residual deformity. It has been shown to yield consistent and reproducible results in this subset of patients in an easy, quick and safe manner. The technique is also easily learned and taught. The resultant scarring is positioned along the lines of least skin tension and is quite inconspicuous and well hidden in patients with excess chest wall hair.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Mohamed Hamdy Elghotmy, Department of Intensive Care and Pain Management, Mistry of Health, Menoufia, Egypt

Anaesthesia, Intensive care & and Pain Management Department, Mistry of Health, Menoufia, Egypt

References

Filgo AJ, Foley JF, Puvanesarajah S, Borde AR, Midkiff BR, Reed CE, et al. Mammary gland evaluation in juvenile toxicity studies: temporal developmental patterns in the male and female harlan sprague-dawley rat. Toxicolo Pathol. 2016;44(7):1034-58.

Swerdloff RS, Ng CM. Gynecomastia: etiology, diagnosis, and treatment. InEndotext. MDText. com, Inc. 2019.

Filgo AJ, Faqi AS. Effects of chemicals on mammary gland development. In Developmental and Reproductive Toxicology, Humana Press, New York, NY; 2017: 205-234.

Rahmani S, Turton P, Shaaban A, Dall B. Overview of gynecomastia in the modern era and the Leeds Gynaecomastia Investigation algorithm. Breast J. 2011;17(3):246-55.

Cuhaci N, Polat SB, Evranos B, Ersoy R, Cakir B. Gynecomastia: clinical evaluation and management. Indian J Endocrinol Metabol. 2014;18(2):150.

Barros AC, Sampaio MD. Gynecomastia: physiopathology, evaluation and treatment. Sao Paulo Med J. 2012;130(3):187-97.

Sansone A, Romanelli F, Sansone M, Lenzi A, Di Luigi L. Gynecomastia and hormones. Endocrine. 2017;55(1):37-44.

Soliman AT, De Sanctis V, Yassin M. Management of adolescent gynecomastia: an update. Acta bio-medica: Atenei Parmensis. 2017;88(2):204.

Leung KCA, Leung AC. Gynecomastia in infants, children, and adolescents. Recent patents on endocrine, metabolic and immune drug discovery. Ingenta. 2016,10(2):127-37.

Narula HS, Carlson HE. Gynecomastia. Endocrinol Metab Clin N Am. 2007;36:497-519.

Fruhstorfer BH, Malata CM. A systematic approach to the surgical management of gynecomastia. Br J Plast Surg. 2007;56:237-46.

Handschin AE, Bietry D, Husler R, Banic A, Constantinescu M. Surgical Management of Gynecomastia a 10-year Analysis. World J Surg. 2008;32:38-44.

Rohrich RJ, Ha RY, Kenkel JM. Classification and management of gynecomastia: Defining the role of ultrasound assisted liposuction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111:909-23.

Fentiman IS, Fourquet A, Hortobagyi GN. Male breast cancer. Lancet. 2006;367:595-604.

Goldwyn RM, Cohen MN. The Unfavorable Result in Plastic Surgery: Avoidance and Treatment. 3rd ed. Baltimore, Md: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2001: 663-673.

Simon BE, Hoffman S, Kahn S. Classification and surgical correction of gynecomastia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1973;124:556.

Tashkandi M, Al-Qattan M, Hassanain JM, Hawary MB. The Surgical Management of High-Grade Gynecomastia. Ann Plastic Surg. 2004;53(1):17-20.

Downloads

Published

2019-11-26

How to Cite

Elghotmy, M. H. (2019). Surgical intervention using ellipse technique in treatment of gynecomastia. International Surgery Journal, 6(12), 4253–4260. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20195383

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles