DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20195393

The modifications in surgical technique and its impact on short term morbidity in modified radical mastectomy: a tertiary care hospital experience

Arnab Bandyopadhyay, Rajnish Talwar, Amol Patel, Pradeep Jaiswal

Abstract


Background: Necrosis of flap margins, postoperative pain and shoulder dysfunction are amongst the main concerns of the breast surgeon performing modified radical mastectomy (MRM). This pilot study is aimed to evaluate the effects of these procedural modifications and whether should it be included as a standard practice.

Methods: A total of 150 MRM patients are evaluated in this single arm cohort study in a tertiary care centre over a time period of 2 years (2014-2016). The following modifications are adopted in the usual procedure of the MRM: double skin incision and elective excision of the skin margins, injecting long acting local anesthetic agent (bupivacaine) preoperatively around the nerve pedicles in axilla and postoperative positioning of arm in hyper abduction and early resumption of Shoulder exercises

Results: Flap margin necrosis has reduced considerably (2.6%) in comparison to historical data (15%). Pain relief was significantly less on first post-operative day (mean VAS score 2.93) which encouraged early shoulder mobilisation. Flap necrosis was more in T4 tumours (75% vs 25%) which was significant with a p value of .004. Similarly flap necrosis at 48hrs was more with the patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with a p value of 0.047. Higher nodal burden was significantly correlated with flap necrosis with a p value of .002.

Conclusions: This pilot study provides preliminary evidence of the positive effects of the proposed modifications on minimising morbidity following MRM further convincing evidence by way of multi-centric randomized control trials, will be required to validate the conclusions of this study.


Keywords


Flap margin necrosis, Morbidity, Modified radical mastectomy, Pain, Restriction of shoulder movement

Full Text:

PDF

References


Globocan 2018. Available at: http://cancerindia.org.in/globocan-2018-india-factsheet. Accessed on 1 September 2018.

WHO. Breast cancer: prevention and control. Available at: http://www.who.int/cancer/detection/breastcancer/en/. Accessed on 1 September 2018.

Agarwal G, Ramakant P. Breast cancer care in India: the current scenario and the challenges for the future. Breast Care. 2008;3(1):21.

Katz SJ, Lantz PM, Janz NK, Fagerlin A, Schwartz K, Liu L, et al. Patient involvement in surgery treatment decisions for breast cancer. J Clini Oncol. 2005;23(24):5526-33.

Teh YC, Shaari NE, Taib NA, Ng CH, See MH, Tan GH, et al. Determinants of choice of surgery in Asian patients with early breast cancer in a middle income country. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15:3163-7.

NCCN guidelines: 2016-2017. Available at: https://www.nccn.org/about/news/ebulletin/ebulletindetail.aspx?ebulletinid=799. Accessed on 1 September 2016.

Lemaine V, Hoskin TL, Farley DR, Grant CS, Boughey JC, Torstenson TA, et al. Introducing the SKIN score: a validated scoring system to assess severity of mastectomy skin flap necrosis. Annals Surg Oncol. 2015;22(9):2925-32.

Lotze MT, Duncan MA, Gerber LH, Woltering EA, Rosenberg SA. Early versus delayed shoulder motion following axillary dissection: a randomized prospective study. Annals Surg. 1981;193(3):288.

Pollard K, Callum KG, Altman DG. Shoulder movement following mastectomy. Clin Oncol. 1976;2:343-9.

Wingate L, Croghan I, Natarajan N, Michalek AM, Jordan C. Rehabilitation of the mastectomy patient: a randomized, blind, prospective study. Archives Physical Med Rehab. 1989;70(1):21-4.

Na YM, Lee JS, Park JS, Kang SW, Lee HD, Koo JY. Early rehabilitation program in postmastectomy patients: a prospective clinical trial. Yonsei Med J. 1999;40(1):1-8.

Hladiuk M, Huchcroft S, Temple W, Schnurr BE. Arm function after axillary dissection for breast cancer: a pilot study to provide parameter estimates. J Surg Oncol. 1992;50(1):47-52.

Fayman M, Beeton A, Potgieter E, Becker PJ. Comparative analysis of bupivacaine and ropivacaine for infiltration analgesia for bilateral breast surgery. Aesthetic Plastic Surg. 2003;27(2):100-3.

Lu L, Fine NA. The efficacy of continuous local anesthetic infiltration in breast surgery: reduction mammaplasty and reconstruction. Plastic Reconstructive Surg. 2005;115(7):1927-34.

Coveney E, Weltz CR, Greengrass R, Iglehart JD, Leight GS, Steele SM, Lyerly HK. Use of paravertebral block anesthesia in the surgical management of breast cancer: experience in 156 cases. Annals Surg. 1998;227(4):496.

Bhuvaneswari V, Wig J, Mathew PJ, Singh G. Post-operative pain and analgesic requirements after paravertebral block for mastectomy: A randomized controlled trial of different concentrations of bupivacaine and fentanyl. Ind J Anaesthesia. 2012;56(1):34.

Zimmermann-Nielsen E, Dahl MB, Graversen HP. Effects of tobacco smoking on the incidence of flap necrosis after mastectomy. Ugeskrift For Laeger. 1997;159(33):4974-6.

Jeevan R, Cromwell D, Browne J, Van Der Meulen J, Pereira J, Caddy C. National mastectomy and breast reconstruction audit. NHS Inf Cent. 2011.

Paige KT, Bried JT, Jones G. A comparison of morbidity from bilateral, unipedicled and unilateral, unipedicled TRAM flap breast reconstructions. Plastic Reconstructive Surg. 1998;101(7):1819-27.

Padubidri AN, Yetman R, Browne E, Lucas A, Papay F, Larive B, Zins J. Complications of postmastectomy breast reconstructions in smokers, ex-smokers, and nonsmokers. Plastic Reconstructive Surg. 2001;107(2):342-9.

Davies K, Allan L, Roblin P, Ross D, Farhadi J. Factors affecting post-operative complications following skin sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction. Breast. 2011;20(1):21-5.

Fine RE, Vose JG. Traditional electrosurgery and a low thermal injury dissection device yield different outcomes following bilateral skin-sparing mastectomy: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2011;5(1):212.