DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20194437

Pressure off-loading Mandakini dressing versus conventional wet gauze dressing in the treatment of neuropathic plantar ulcers: a randomized controlled trial

Sreenivasan Sanjeev, Thirugnanasambandam Nelson, Sathasivam Sureshkumar, Sadasivan Jagdish, Chinnakali Palanivel

Abstract


Background: Plantar ulcers are one of the significant causes of morbidity in diabetic and non- diabetic neuropathic foot and remain a major initiating event for amputation. This randomized controlled trial was carried out to establish the benefits of the 'Mandakini' dressing in comparison with conventional wet gauze dressings, in patients with neuropathic plantar ulcers.

Methods: The treatment group received ‘Mandakini’ dressing which was changed every week. Control group received conventional wet gauze dressings. Size of the ulcer, grade of the ulcer and wound surface area was assessed at the end of every week up to 6 weeks in both groups. The percentage of wound covered with granulation tissue, the percentage of wound covered with non-viable tissue and the time taken for healing of the ulcer were compared between the two groups.

Results: A total of 60 patients were randomized into treatment and control group with 30 patients in each. The ‘Mandakini’ dressing group had a significant reduction in the wound size at 6 weeks compared to the control group (1.29 vs. 2.31 cm2; p ≤0.0001). Time taken for healing of the ulcer was significantly less in ‘Mandakini’ dressing group (4.83 vs. 5.4 weeks; p=0.013).

Conclusions: Mandakini dressing significantly reduces the wound size and time taken for the healing of plantar ulcer compared to conventional wet gauze dressing. Patient acceptability, patient satisfaction, quality of life and cost of the total treatment were better in Mandakini dressing group.


Keywords


Mandakini dressing, Off-loading pressure techniques, Neuropathic foot, Plantar ulcers

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ramsey SD, Newton K, Blough D, McCulloch DK, Sandhu N, Reiber GE, et al. Incidence, outcomes, and cost of foot ulcers in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1999;22:382-7.

American Diabetes Association. Consensus development conference on diabetic foot wound care. Diabetes Care. 1999;22:1354–60.

Pinzur MS, Dart HC. Pedorthic management of the diabetic foot. Foot Ankle Clin. 2001;6:205–14.

Armstrong DG, Liswood PL, Todd WF. Potential risks of accommodative padding in the treatment of neuropathic ulcerations. Ostomy Wound Management. 1995;41:44–9.

Boulton AJ, Armstrong DG, Albert SF, Frykberg RG, Hellman R, Hellman MS, et al. Comprehensive foot examination and risk assessment. Diabetes Care. 2008;31:1679-85.

Scott G. The diabetic foot examination: A positive step in the prevention of diabetic foot ulcers and amputation. Osteopathic Family Physician. 2013;5:73–8.

Kari SV. The economical way to off-load diabetic foot ulcers [Mandakini off-loading device]. Indian J Surg. 2010;72:133–4.

Agrawal VP, Sreeramulu PN. Most Easy on the Pocket Offloading Device Costing<1$ for Rural Diabetic Foot Ulcers. Surgery Curr Res. 2012;2:124.

Sussman C, Barbara BJ. Wound Care: a collaborative practice manual for health professionals. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 3rd ed. Wolters Kluwer; 2006: 21–47.

Armstrong DG, Lavery LA, Nixon BP, Boulton AJ. It’s not what you put on, but what you take off: techniques for debriding and off-loading the diabetic foot wound. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(2):92-9.

Decarlo AA, Whitelock J, Ellis AL. Wound and Cutaneous Injury Healing with a Nucleic Acid Encoding a Proteoglycan Polypeptide. Available at: https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2008143863A1/en. Accessed on 10 May 2018.

FrykbergRG. Diabetic foot ulcers: pathogenesis and management. Am Fam Physician. 2002;66:1655-62.

Steed DL, Donohoe D, Webster MW, Lindsley L. Effect of extensive debridement and treatment on healing of diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetic Ulcer Study Group. J Am Coll Surg. 1996;183:61-4.

Edwards J, Stapley S. Debridement of diabetic foot ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;1:23-34.

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. NHS Evidence. Diabetic foot problems: evidence update. Available at: http:// www. evidence.nhs.uk. Accessed on 10 March 2013.

Bakker K, Apelqvist J, Schaper NC; International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot Editorial Board. Practical guidelines on the management and prevention of the diabetic foot 2011. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2012;28(1):225-31.