DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20194433

Supraclavicular artery island flap in the reconstruction of oral cavity cancer defects

Hemant S. Lekawale, Rachana V. Gaidole

Abstract


Background: Microvascular free flaps are the standard of care in the reconstruction of head and neck resection defects, however they need a significant surgical expertise and increase the operative time. Supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) is a versatile fasciocutaneous flap that offers the advantage of both, a regional flap (easy to harvest) and a free flap (thin and pliable) in the head and neck reconstruction.

Methods: In this study we analysed the utility of this flap for the oral cavity cancer defect reconstruction done in 12 consecutive cases.

Results: There were 8 males and 4 females with a mean age of 54.75 years. The oral cavity subsites were as follows: buccal 3 (25%); tongue 3 (25%); lower alveolus 2 (16.66%); floor of mouth 1 (8.33%); gingivobuccal sulcus 2 (16.66%); retromolar trigone 01(8.33%).The excisional defect size ranged from 4×2 cm to 6×3 cm with a mean size of 5×3 cm. The mean harvest time was 45 minutes (range 35 min - 65 min). We had complete flap loss in 2 (16.66%) patients and partial flap loss in 1 (8.33%) patient. Donor site wound gape was noted in 2 (16.66%) patients. The hospital stay ranged from 7 days to 10 days in non-complicated cases. The mean follow up period was of 8.58 months.

Conclusions: SCAIF is versatile, easy to harvest, safe and reliable in selective cases of oral cavity cancers and a potential alternative regional flap in head and neck reconstruction.


Keywords


Supraclavicular artery island flap, Reconstruction, Oral cavity cancer

Full Text:

PDF

References


Mütter TD. Case of deformity from burns relieved by operation. Am J Med Sci. 1842;4:66.

Kirschbaum S. Mentosternal contracture: preferred treatment by acromial (in charretera) flap. Plast Reconstr Surg Transplant Bull. 1958;21(2):131-8.

Mathes SJ, Vasconez LO. The cervicohumeral flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1978;61(1):7-12.

Lamberty BG. The supra-clavicular axial patterned flap. Br J Plast Surg. 1979;32(3):207-12.

Pallua N, Machens HG, Rennekampff O, Becker M, Berger A. The fasciocutaneous Supraclavicular Artery Island flap for releasing postburn mentosternal contractures. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;99(7):1878-86.

Chiu ES, Liu PH, Friedlander PL. Supraclavicular Artery Island flap for head and neck oncologic reconstruction: indications, complications, and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(1):115-23.

Alves HR, Ishida LC, Ishida LH, Besteiro JM, Gemperli R, Faria JC, et al. A clinical experience of the supraclavicular flap used to reconstruct head and neck defects in late-stage cancer patients. J Plast Reconst Aesthet Surg. 2012;65(10):1350-6.

Kokot N, Mazhar K, Reder LS, Peng GL, Sinha UK. The Supraclavicular Artery Island Flap in Head and Neck Reconstruction: Applications and Limitations. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;139(11):1247-55.

Sandu K, Monnier P, Pasche P. Supraclavicular flap in head and neck reconstruction:experience in 50 consecutive patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;269(4):1261-7.

Chen WL, Zhang DM, Yang ZH, Huang ZQ, Wang JG, Zhang B, et al. Extended supraclavicular fasciocutaneous island flap based on the transverse cervical artery for head and neck reconstruction after cancer ablation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;68(10):2422-30.

Chen CM, Lin GT, Fu YC, Shieh TY, Huang IY, Shen YS, et al. Complications of free radial forearm flap transfers for head and neck reconstruction. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005;99(6):671-6.

Shah JP, Haribhakti V, Loree TR, Sutaria P. Complications of the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap in head and neck reconstruction. Am J Surg. 1990;160(4):352-4.

Qureshi SS, Chaturvedi P, Pai PS, Chaukar DA, Deshpande MS, Pathak KA, et al. A prospective study of pharyngocutaneous fistulas following total laryngectomy. J Cancer Res Ther. 2005;1(1):51-6.