Vacuum assisted closure versus total contact casting in the healing of plantar foot ulcers: a comparative prospective study

Authors

  • Srikanth Reddy Challapalli Department of General Surgery, Sri Venkateswara Medical College, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • Theja Peddavenkatagari Department of General Surgery, Sri Venkateswara Medical College, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • Chanda Sukanya Department of General Surgery, Sri Venkateswara Medical College, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • Venkataprakash Gandikota Department of General Surgery, Sri Venkateswara Medical College, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • Praveena Srimanthula Venkata Department of General Surgery, Sri Venkateswara Medical College, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • Bharathi Potluri Department of General Surgery, Sri Venkateswara Medical College, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20193647

Keywords:

Plantar foot ulcers, Healing, Vacuum assisted closure, Total contact casting

Abstract

Background: The objective of the study was to compare the effectiveness of vacuum assisted closure (VAC) and total contact casting (TCC) in the healing of plantar foot ulcers. Chronic leg ulcers are a significant cause of morbidity in developing countries like India, leading to excessive health care expenses and loss of effective work hours, inspite of availability of various novel modalities of management. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of vacuum assisted closure and total contact casting in the healing in plantar foot ulcers, in order to standardise a procedure with maximum benefits.

Methods: This comparative prospective study was conducted on 150 individuals admitted to SVRRGG Hospital, Tirupati, with the diagnosis of plantar foot ulcers from august 2017 to march 2019. They were divided into 2 groups, Group A (75 patients treated with VAC) and Group B (75 patients treated with TCC). In this study, the outcomes assessed were reduction of wound size and length of hospital stay.

Results: In this study, mean reduction of wound surface area with VAC and TCC was 21.09 and 12.83 respectively, mean percentage of reduction of wound size with VAC is 90.43 and in TCC was 52.36. Mean hospital stay with VAC and TCC was 24.90 days and 51.29 days respectively.

Conclusions: VAC is more effective than TCC in the treatment of foot ulcers, with less duration of hospital stay and earlier returns to work.

Author Biographies

Srikanth Reddy Challapalli, Department of General Surgery, Sri Venkateswara Medical College, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India

Associate Professor 

Department of General Surgery

Theja Peddavenkatagari, Department of General Surgery, Sri Venkateswara Medical College, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India

ASSISTANT PROFESSOR,

DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SURGERY,

S.V. MEDICAL COLLEGE,

TIRUPATI

Chanda Sukanya, Department of General Surgery, Sri Venkateswara Medical College, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India

JUNIOR RESIDENT

DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SURGERY

Venkataprakash Gandikota, Department of General Surgery, Sri Venkateswara Medical College, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India

PROFESSOR,

DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SURGERY

Praveena Srimanthula Venkata, Department of General Surgery, Sri Venkateswara Medical College, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India

JUNIOR RESIDENT,

DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SURGERY

Bharathi Potluri, Department of General Surgery, Sri Venkateswara Medical College, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India

JUNIOR RESIDENT,

DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SURGERY

References

Low P. Pathogenesis of Diabetic Neuropathy,' Joslin's Diabetes mellitus'. 14th edition. USA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005: 839–851.

Akbari C, Logerfo. Vascular disease of the lower extremities in diabetes mellitus: Etiology and management, 'Joslin's Diabetes mellitus'. 14th edition. USA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005: 1124–1131.

Armstrong DG, Lavery LA, Harkless LB. Validation of diabetic wound classification system. The contribution of depth, infection and ischemia to risk of amputation. Diabetes Care. 1998;21(5):855-9.

Shahrad Bejestani H, Motabar AR. Assessment of diabetic foot ulcer‘s predisposing factors and its outcomes in patients with diabetic foot syndrome hospitalized in HazratRasol-e-Akram hospital in Tehran during 1996-2001. J Iran Med Sci Uni. 2004;39:77–84.

Fleischmann W, Strecker W, Bombelli M, Kinzl L. Vacuum sealing as treatment of soft tissue damage in open fractures. Unfallchirurg. 1993;96(9):488-92.

Morykwas MJ, Argenta LC, Shelton-Brown EI, McGuirt W. Vacuum-assisted closure: a new method for wound control and treatment: animal studies and basic foundation. Ann Plast Surg. 1997;38(6):553-62.

Thomas S. An Introduction to the use of vacuum assisted closure. 2001.

Sinacore DR, Mueller MJ, Diamond JE, Blair III VP, Drury D, Rose SJ. Diabetic plantar ulcers treated by total contact casting: A clinical report. Physical Therapy. 1987;67(10):1543-9.

Boulton AJ. Pressure and the diabetic foot: clinical science and offloading techniques. Am J Surg. 2004;187(5):17-24.

Armstrong DG, Lavery LA, Bushman TR. Peak foot pressures influence the healing time of diabetic foot ulcers treated with total contact casts. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1998;35(1):1-5.

Caravaggi C, Faglia E, De Giglio R, Mantero M, Quarantiello A, Sommariva E, et al. Effectiveness and safety of a nonremovable fiberglass off-bearing cast versus a therapeutic shoe in the treatment of neuropathic foot ulcers: a randomized study. Diabetes Care. 2000;23:1746-51.

Nather A, Chionh SB, Han AY, Chan PP, Nambiar A. Effectiveness of vacuum - assisted closure (VAC) therapy in the healing of chronic diabetic foot ulcers. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2010;39(5):353-8.

Birke JA, Pavich MA, Patout Jr CA, Horswell R. Comparison of forefoot ulcer healing using alternative off-loading methods in patients with diabetes mellitus. Advances Skin Wound Care. 2002;15(5):210-5.

Lone AM, Zaroo MI, Laway BA, Pala NA, Bashir SA, Rasool A, Vacuum Assisted closure versus conventional dressings in the management of Diabetic foot ulcers: a prospective case controlled study. Diabetic Foot Ankle. 2014;5.

Armstrong DG, Nguyen HC, Lavery LA, Van Schie CHM, Boulton AJM, Harkless LB. Off-loading the diabetic foot wound: A randomised clinical trial. Diabetes Care. 2001;24(6):1019-22.

Philbeck TE, Whittington KT, Millsap MH, Briones RB, Wight DG, Schroeder WJ. The clinical and cost effectiveness of externally applied negative pressure wound therapy in the treatment of wounds in home healthcare Medicare patients. Ostomy Wound Manage. 1999;45(11):41-50.

Downloads

Published

2019-08-28

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles