Mesh fixation versus non fixation in open herrnioplasty


  • Hossam Abd Ellatif Abo Elkasem Department of General Surgery, Sohag Faculty of Medicine, Sohag, Egypt
  • Ahmed Abdelkahaar Aldardeer Department of General Surgery, Sohag Faculty of Medicine, Sohag, Egypt



Fixation, Hernia recurrence, Inguinal hernia, Mesh migration


Background: The goal of this study was to compare herrnioplasty with or without mesh fixation for inguinal hernias, paraumbilical hernia and epigastric hernia.

Methods: This study included 288patients (170 males and 118 females) of different age groups with hernia  who were admitted to general surgery department of sohag university hospital during the period from April 2018 to march 2019. Analysis of the clinical presentation, type of hernia and patients risk factors was done. All patients with above mentioned hernias without history of previous operations, was eligible for the study.

Results: A total of 288 patients, 123 patients (42.7%) had oblique inguinal hernia, 75 patients (26%) had epigastric hernia, 77 (26.7%) had Para umbilical hernia and 13 (4.5%) had direct inguinal hernia. We had two groups, group (I) with mesh fixation included 141 patients (49%), while group (II) included patients (51%) without fixation of the mesh. Methods of fixation of the mesh in group (I) included suturing in 94 patients (32.6%), while using staples in 47 patients (16.3%). From 288 patients, 26 patients (9%) were hypertensives, 13 patients (4.5%) were diabetic and 13 patients (4.5%) were smokers. Follow up period extended for eight months post operatively, patients without fixation to their mesh had less pain and infection.

Conclusions: Herrnioplasty can be carried out either with fixation of the mesh or not, it will not affect recurrence of the hernia and has less cost and operative time. 


Preetham RG. A study of Uncomplicated Inguinal Hernia Repair as A day care Surgery. Diss. RGUHS. 2009.‏

Sauerland S, Jaschinski T, Edmund AMN. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2010;‏ 10.

Khan K. Systematic reviews to support evidence-based medicine. Crc Press; 2011.‏

Rosen MJ. Multicenter, prospective, longitudinal study of the recurrence, surgical site infection, and quality of life after contaminated ventral hernia repair using biosynthetic absorbable mesh: the COBRA study. Ann Surg. 2017:265(1);205.‏

Mooradian DL. Allografts and xenografts in soft tissue repair: Current use and future trends. Extracellular Matrix-derived Implants in Clinical Medicine. Woodhead Publishing; 2016;41-62.‏

Miserez, M. Update with level 1 studies of the European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia. 2014;18.2:151-63.‏

Reinpold W. Risk factors of chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review. Innovative Surgical Sci. 2017;2(2):61-8.‏

Baiomy TA, Ehab MO. Is mesh fixation considered a routine step in transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair? The Zagazig-Benha experience. Egyptian J Surg. 2017:36(2):168.‏

Kraus K, Jonathan, Franzen. The Kraus project: Essays by Karl Kraus. Macmillan; 2014.‏

Ferzli R, Lina JK. A no-reference objective image sharpness metric based on the notion of just noticeable blur (JNB). IEEE Transactions Image Processing. 2009;18(4):717-28.‏

Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. The Collected Works of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Volume 4 (Part II): The Friend. Princeton University Press; 2015.‏

Hollinsky C, Sandberg S. Measurement of the tensile strength of the ventral abdominal wall in comparison with scar tissue. Clinical Biomechanics. 2007;22(1):88-92.‏






Original Research Articles