A comparative study of skin staples and conventional sutures for abdominal skin wound closures
Keywords:Skin staples, Skin suturing, Conventional sutures
Background: The objectives of the study were to study the operative time, the effect on wound healing, cosmetic results, patients acceptance and total cost with the use of sutures and staples.
Methods: The study was conducted on 100 patients who were undergoing elective surgery from January 2016 to July 2017 in our institute. The patients were randomly selected to receive either suture or staple.
Results: The study group included 50 patients who underwent wound closure by staplers and 50 patients underwent suturing. The commonest region of the surgical wounds was Mc Burneys site. The time taken for wound closure using staplers showed statistically significance difference over closure with suture, it took the stapler 4 times less duration to perform wound closure. The average cost of using stapler was higher than suturing. The appearance of the scar among the staple group was good in 90% of those who returned for follow-up at 1 month, 10% had average scar. The patients acceptance was better in staple group with less pain during removal as compared to suture group. P-value calculated using students unpaired T-test. P<0.0001 which was highly significant.
Conclusions: Staples did not cause excess wound pain and allows saving in time with better cosmetic results.
Doctor HG. Surgeons and sutures. 2nd edition, Ethicon, USA, 1999.
Chavan Deepak R, Metan BB, Kadlewad S, Bharath S. Study of skin staples and conventional sutures for abdominal clean wound skin closure: a randomized control trial. J Evolution Med Dent. 2014;3(20):5626-36.
Bailey H, Love M. Bailey And Love. Short Practical Of Surgery (Norman S Williams,Christopher Ed). Great Britian: CRC Press; 26th ed, 2013: 42.
Kochar MP, Singh SP. Incised surgical wound closure with sutures and staples. Int Surg J. 2015;2(3):369-72.
Batra J, Kumar R. Comparison of skin staples and standard sutures for closing incision after head and neck cancer surgery. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2016;15(2):243–50.
Bryant Wm. Wound Healing. Clinical Symposia. 1977;29:2-26.
dos Santos LR1, Freitas CA, Hojaij FC, Araújo Filho VJ, Cernea CR, Brandão LG, et al. Prospective study using skin staplers in head and neck surgery. Am J Surg. 1995;170(5):451-2.
Ranaboldo CJ, Rowe-Jones DC. Closure of laporatomy wounds: skin staples versus sutures. Br J Surg. 1992;79:1172-3.
Kanagaye JT, Vance CW, Chan L, Schonfeld N. Comparison of skin stapling devices and standard sutures for pediatric scalp lacerations: a randomized study of cost and time benefits. J Pediatr. 1997;130:813.
Eldrup J, Wied U, Anderson B. Randomised trial comparing Proximate stapler with conventional skin closure. Acta Chirurg Scand. 1981;147:501-2.
Meiring L, Cilliers K, Barry R, Nel CJC. A comparison of a disposable skin stapler and nylon sutures for wound closure. S Afr Med J. 1982;62:371-2.
Harvey CF, Logan J. A prospective trial of skin staples and sutures in skin closure. Ir J Med Sci. 1986;155:194-6.
Orlinsky M, Goldberg RM, Chan L, Puertos A, Slager HL. Cost analysis of stapler versus suturing for skin closure. Am J Emerg Med. 1995;13:77-81.
Tuuli Methodius G, Rampersad Roxane M, Carbone Jeanine F, David S, Macones George A, Odibo Anthony O. Staples Compared With Subcuticular Suture for Skin Closure After Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(3):682-90.
Smith TO, Sexton D, Mann C, Donell S. Meta analysis of stabler verse sutures. BMJ. 2010;340:c1199.