DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20192974

Mixer grinder finger tip injuries and treatment outcome in a rural based tertiary center: a retrospective study

Deepak Hongaiah, Abhilash ., Dharmendra Kumar, Vijay Kumar S.

Abstract


Background: Early morning mixer grinder fingertip injuries is encountered predominantly in females. Most of these injuries happened due to improper use of the grinder like keeping hands into the mixer when still the blades on run immediately after switching off the machine and sometimes during washing the jar. It can lead to injury of either single or multiple finger and either at single or multiple levels. Early wound debridement and reconstruction is essential for good functional outcome, prevention of the deformity and to achieve good cosmesis. The objective of the study was to classify the mixer grinder fingertip injuries and to asses treatment outcome of different type of mixer grinder fingertip injuries.

Methods: This is a retrospective study involving 12 patients over a period of 2 years. Data was collected from the previous records and was analysed using SPSS 22 version software. Categorical data was represented in the form of Frequencies and proportions.

Results: In the present study most common age group involved is between 26 and 30 years (66.7%) with female predominance and most common hand involved was right hand. D3 involved most frequently and at multiple levels. Most of them were treated under wrist block followed by digital block with very good short term and long term outcome.

Conclusions: The treatment of the fingertip injuries should be aimed at preserving the length of the digit by giving adequate wound debridement and primary suturing/flap reconstruction when possible to provide soft-tissue coverage with protective sensation at a minimum.


Keywords


Fingertip injury, Mixer grinder injury, Treatment outcome

Full Text:

PDF

References


Zook EG, Brown RE. The Perionychium. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company; Hand Clinics; 2002: 553-623.

Patankar HS. Use of Modified Tension Band Sutures for Finger Nail Disruptions. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2007;32:668-74.

Bindra RR. Management of nail-bed fracture-lacerations using a tension-band suture. J Hand Surg Am. 1996;21:1111-3.

Bristol SG, Verchere CG. The transverse figure of eight suture for securing the nail. J Hand Surg Am. 2007;32:124-5.

Brown RE, Zook EG, Russell RC. Fingertip reconstruction with flaps and nail bed grafts. J Hand Surg Am. 1999;24:345-51.

Mohammed HYE, Ahmed OM. Hand machinery injuries presentation and management (omdurman teaching hospital). J Med Res Surg. 2013;4:7-9.

Trybus M, Lorkowski J, Brongel L, et al. Causes and consequences of hand injuries. Am J Surg. 2006;192:52-7.

Rosberg HE, Dahlin LB. Epidemiology of hand injuries in the middle-sized city in Southern Sweden: a retrospective comparison of 1989 and 1997. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2004;38:347-55.

Trybus M, Guzik P. Occupational hand injuries. Med Pr. 2004;55:341-4.

Ahmed E, Chaka T. Prospective study of patients with hand injuries: Tikur Anbessa University Teaching Hospital, Addis Abba. Ethiop Med J. 2006;44:175-81.

Beaton AA, William L, Moseley LG. Handedness and hand injuries. J Hand Surg Br. 1994;19:158- 61.

Saxena P, Cutler L, Feldberg L. Assessment of the severity of hand injuries using “Hand Injury Severity Score” and its correlation with functional outcome. Injury. 2004;35:511-6.

Gaddis, ML, Gaddis, GM. Introduction to biostatistics: Part 4, Statistical inference techniques in hypothesis testing. Ann Emerg Med. 1990;19:820-5.

Patra P. Sample size in clinical research, the number we need. Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2012;1:5-9.

Sunder Rao P SS, Richard J. An Introduction to Biostatistics, A manual for students in health sciences. 4th Ed. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India; 2006: 86-160.

Elenbaas, RM, Elenbaas, JK, Cuddy, PG. Evaluating the medical literature, part II: Statistical analysis.Ann Emerg Med. 1983;12:610-20.

Stevenson TR. Fingertip and nail bed injuries. Orthop Clin North Am. 1992;23:149-59.

Holm A, Zachariae L. Fingertip lesions. An evaluation of conser- vative treatment versus free skin grafting. Acta Orthop Scand. 1974;45(3):382- 92.

Louis D, Palmer A, Burney R. Open treatment of digital tip injuries. JAMA. 1980;244:697-8.

Douglas BS. Conservative management of Guillotine amputations of the finger in children. Aust Paediatr J. 1972;8:8-9.

Russell RC, Casas LA. Management of fingertip injuries. ClinPlast Surg. 1989;16(3):405-25.

Henry M, Stutz C. Homodigital antegrade-flow neurovascular pedicle flaps for sensate reconstruction of fingertip amputation injuries. J Hand Surg Am. 2006;31(7):1220-5.

Lister G. The hand: diagnosis and indications. 3rd edition. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1993: 121-125.

Atasoy E, Loakimidis E, Kasdan ML, Kutz JE, Kleinert HE. Reconstruction of the amputated finger tip with a triangular volar flap. A new surgical proce- dure. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970;52:9216.

Lee NH, Pae WS, Roh SG, Oh KJ, Bae CS, Yang KM. Innervated cross-finger pulp flap for reconstruction of the fingertip. Arch Plast Surg. 2012;39(6):637-42.

Yildirim S, Avci G, Akan M, Aköz T. Complications of the reverse homodigital island flap in fingertip reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2002;48(6):58692.