DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20192955

Anatomical variations of the inguinal morphometric features in patients with inguinal hernia and its association with the type of inguinal hernia: a prospective clinical study

Balaiya Anitha, Sathasivam Sureshkumar, Karuppusamy Aravindhan, Manwar Ali

Abstract


Background: Variations of inguinal canal and inguinal nerves are not uncommon. Knowledge about those variations is important to avoid inadvertent injury to the vital structures and to prevent recurrence.

Methods: This prospective clinical study included all patients undergoing open inguinal hernia repair. Laparoscopic hernia repair, emergency surgery for complication and recurrent inguinal hernia were excluded. Parameters studied include interspinous distance, length and obliquity of inguinal ligament, attachment of conjoint tendon, condition of transversalis fascia and position and variations of ilioinguinal nerve.

Results: The study included 192 patients. The mean interspinous distance (ISD) was 22±3.45 cm (CI: 30-32). ISD was not significant different among the two types of hernia. The mean length of internal oblique on inguinal ligament from anterior superior iliac spine was significantly longer in patients with indirect inguinal hernia (4±0.791 vs. 4.27±1.34; p=0.000). Significant patients in the direct hernia had weak transversalis fascia ((95% vs. 43%). 80% of the patients with direct hernia had defect in the transversalis fascia compared to only 8.8% in the indirect hernia. The difference is statistically significant. The nerve variation was present in only 1.3% in direct hernia group compared to 3.5% in the indirect hernia group.

Conclusions: It was observed that the type of hernia did not significantly influenced by the length of inguinal ligament, the mean distance of midinguinal point, obliquity of the inguinal ligament. The nerve variation was present in only 1.3% in direct hernia group compared to 3.5% in the indirect hernia group.


Keywords


Morphometry, Inguinal hernia, Midinguinal point, Ilioinguinal nerve, Hernia risk factors

Full Text:

PDF

References


Burcharth J. The epidemiology and risk factors for recurrence after inguinal hernia surgery. Dan Med J. 2014;61:B4846.

Ramanan B, Maloley BJ, Fitzgibbons RJ. Inguinal hernia follow or repair? Adv Surg. 2014;48:1-11.

Borley NR. Anterior Abdominal Wall. In: Standring S, Eds. Grays Anatomy: The anatomical basis of clinical practice. 40th ed. London: Elsevier- Churchill Livingstone; 2008: 1055-1067.

Kingsnorth AN. General Introduction and History of Hernia Surgery. In: Kingsnorth AN, LeBlanc KA, eds. Management of Abdominal Hernias. London: Springer; 2013: 1–23.

Abramson JH, Gofin J, Hopp C, Makler A, Epstein LM. The epidemiology of inguinal hernia. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1978;32(1):59–67.

Farhan TM. Anthropometric Study of Pubic Tubercle and Its Clinical Implications. Iraqi J Med Sci. 2011;9:308-11.

Sanjay P, Reid TD, Bowrey DJ, Woodward A. Defining the position of deep inguinal ring in patients with indirect inguinal hernias. Surg Radiol Anat. 2006;28(2):121–4.

Koliyadan SV, Narayan G, Balasekran P. Surface marking of the deep inguinal ring. Clin Anat. 2004;17(7):554–7

Tanyel FC, Öcal T, Karaağaoğlu E, Büyükpamukçu N. Individual and associated effects of length of inguinal canal and caliber of the sac on clinical outcome in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2000;35:1165-9.

Szczesny W, Cerkaska K, Tretyn A, Dabrowiecki S. Etiology of inguinal hernia: ultrastructure of rectus sheath revisited. Hernia. 2006;10(3):266–71.

Flich J, Alfonso JL, Delgado F, Prado MJ, Cortina P. Inguinal hernia and certain risk factors. Eur J Epidemiol. 1992;8:277–82.

Wolloscheck T, Gaumann A, Terzic A, Heintz A, Junginger T, Konerding MA. Inguinal hernia measurement of the biomechanics of the lower abdominal wall and the inguinal canal. Hernia. 2004;8:233-41.

Ndiaye A, Diop M, Ndoye JM, Konaté I, Ndiaye AI, Mané L, et al. Anatomical basis of neuropathies and damage to the ilioinguinal nerve during repairs of groin hernias. (About 100 dissections). Surg Radiol Anat. 2007;29(8):675–81.

Page B, Paterson C, Young D, O’Dwyer PJ. Pain from primary inguinal hernia and the effect of repair on pain. Br J Surg. 2002;89:1315-8.

Bachul P, Tomaszewski KA, Kmiotek EK, Kratochwil M, Solecki R, Walocha JA. Anatomic variability of groin innervation. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2013;72(3):267-70.