A clinical study of evaluation of different modalities of treatment and etiologies of stricture urethra


  • Raviraj R. Raykar Department of Urology, Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubballi, Karnataka, India
  • Ravikumar R. Jadhav Department of Urology, Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubballi, Karnataka, India




Etiology, Evaluation, Stricture urethra, Treatment


Background: Urethral strictures are a common urological problem presenting in day to day urological practice. There has been change in the etiology of urethral strictures with traumatic one’s accounting for majority of them in recent times. Newer treatment modalities like VIU and various kinds of urethroplasty have revolutionized its management and significantly contributed towards improvement of quality of life among these patients. The objective for this study were to study the various aetiologies and different modalities of treatment for urethral strictures.

Methods: A 23 cases of urethral strictures aged 5-75 years admitted in the surgical wards of KIMS, Hubballi were included in the present study. Mean age of presentation was 34.5 years. Detailed history and physical examination were recorded. Relevant investigations like ASU and MCU were performed and recorded. These patients were treated by various surgical procedures considered appropriate as per the patient individual needs.

Results: Mean age was 34.5 years in the present study. Most of the patients presented with obstructive voiding symptoms, straining (65.1%) and poor stream (56.4%). Majority of strictures were of traumatic etiology (60.8%) followed by inflammatory (34.7%) and iatrogenic strictures (4.3%) in the present study. Bulbar urethra was the most commonly involved site (65.1%) followed by posterior urethra (30.4%), penile urethra (17.4%) and meatal stricture (4.3%). Most of the patients presenting with retention of urine were managed by SPC. Both VIU and urethroplasty had good success rates of 72.7% and 80% respectively.

Conclusions: Most of the strictures were of traumatic etiology. VIU and urethroplasty were found to be effective means of treating urethral strictures.


Attwater HL. The history of urethral strictures. Brit J Urol. 1943;15:39.

Staff WG. Urethral involvement in balanitis xerotica obliterns. Brit J Urol. 1970;42:234-9.

Perez R, Llinares MA. Complications of the lower urinary tract secondary to urethral stenosis [Article in Spanish]. Actus Urol Esp. 1996;20(9):786-93.

Sandozi S, Ghazali S. Sachse optical urethrotomy, 6 years of experience. J Urol. 1988;140:968-9.

Heyns CF, Marais DC. Prospective evaluation of the AUA symptom index and peak urinary flow rate for the follow up of men with known urethral stricture disease. J Urol. 2002;168:2051-4.

Santucci RA. Anastomotic urethroplasty for bulbar urethral strictures: analysis of 168 patients. J Urol. 2002;167:1715-9.

Bhandari M, Kumar S, Raju MM. Clinical profile of the inflammatory urethral strictures. Ind J Surg. 1985;47:56-8.

Fenton A, Morey A, Aviles R, Garcia C. Anterior urethral strictures: etiology and characteristics. Urol. 2005;65:1055-8.

Park S, Mcaninch JW. Straddle injuries to the bulbar urethra: management and outcome in 78 patients. J Urol. 2004;171:722-5.

Koraitim M. Experience with 170 cases of posterior urethral strictures during 7 years. J Urol. 1985;133:408-10.

Antony J. Visual internal urethrotomy. Ind J Surg. 1985;47:67-9.

Pansadoro V, Emiliozzi P. Internal urethrotomy in the management of anterior urethral strictures: long term follow up. J Urol. 1996;156:73-5.

Bhandari M, Kumar S. Anastomotic urethroplasty. Indian J Surg. 1985;47:94-5.






Original Research Articles